Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T14:24:49.755Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Prospective Study of Validity of Neurologic Signs in Predicting Positive Cranial Computed Tomography following Minor Head Trauma

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2012

Yassir S. Abdul Rahman ,
Ahmed Sami S. Al Den  and
Kimball I. Maull
Yassir S. Abdul Rahman*
Affiliation:
The Trauma Center, Hamad General Hospital, Doha, Qatar
Ahmed Sami S. Al Den
Affiliation:
The Trauma Center, Hamad General Hospital, Doha, Qatar
Kimball I. Maull
Affiliation:
The Trauma Center, Hamad General Hospital, Doha, Qatar
*
Hamad General HospitalBox 3050Doha, Qatar E-mail: yasirsar@yahoo.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Introduction:

The ability to discriminate among a large number of patients with mild head injury to detect those most likely to have an intracranial abnormality may offer an advantage in mass-casualty situations and when clinical needs exceed diagnostic capabilities.

Hypothesis:

In patients with mild head injury (Glasgow Coma Scale score = 13−15), the likelihood of intracranial abnormality, as defined by cranial computed tomography (CT), varies according to presenting neurologic signs and symptoms.

Methods:

This prospective study consisted of 152 patients with blunt head trauma and one or more of the following: initial loss of consciousness (LOC), headache, vomiting, convulsions, or amnesia. All underwent cranial CT within one hour of presentation. Positive CT findings were defined as cerebral contusion, extra-axial hematoma, intra-ventricular or subarachnoid hemorrhage, brain edema, and skull fracture. Clinical findings were tabulated and compared with CT findings.

Results:

The most common symptoms were headache (61%) followed by followed by LOC (45%), vomiting (39%), amnesia (29%), and convulsions (4%). Convulsions were the most predictive of a CT positive finding (80%); history of LOC was least predictive (29%). The presence of two or more clinical findings tended to increase the likelihood of intracranial abnormality, but the association was neither consistent nor additive.

Conclusions:

Convulsions occurring in a patient with mild head injury are highly predictive of a positive intracranial finding on CT. Headache, amnesia, and vomiting are each likely to show positive findings in approximately 40–45% of cases. Although the least predictive of the neurologic findings studied, loss of consciousness still correlates with a positive cranial CT in 29% of cases. More than one sign or symptom increases the likelihood of concurrent brain injury.

Keywords

amnesiaconvulsionhead computed tomography scanGlasgow Coma Scaleheadacheloss of consciousnessmild head traumavomiting
Type
Original Research
Information
Prehospital and Disaster Medicine , Volume 25 , Issue 1 , February 2010 , pp. 59 - 62
Copyright
Copyright © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Livingston, DH, Loder, PA, Koziol, J, Hunt, CD: The use of CT scanning to triage patients requiring admission following minimal head injury. J Trauma 1991;31:483–487.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Shackford, SR, Wald, SL, Ross, SE, et al. : The clinical utility of computed tomographic scanning and neurologic examination in the management of patients with minor head injuries. J Trauma 1992;33:385–394.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Haydel, MJ, Preston, CA, Mills, TJ, et al. : Indications for computed tomography in patients with minor head injury. N Engl J Med 2000;343:100–105.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Wells, GA, Vandemheen, K, Clement, C., et al. : The Canadian CT head rule for patients with minor head injury. Lancet 2001;357:1394.Google Scholar
5.Sheehan, MK, Maull, KI, LeTarte, P: Cranial computed tomography and observation are redundant in the management of minor head trauma. Panam J Trauma 1999;8:14.Google Scholar
6.Klassen, TP: Variation in utilization of computed tomography scanning for the investigation of minor head trauma in children: A Canadian experience. Acad Emerg Med 2000;7:439–444.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Gruskin, KD, Schutzman, SA: Head trauma in children younger than 2 years: are there predictors for complications? Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1999;153:15–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Davis, RL, Mullen, N, Makela, M, et al. : Cranial computed tomography scans in children after minimal head injury with loss of consciousness. Ann Emerg Med 1994;24:640–645.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Mitchell, KA, Fallat, ME, Raque, GH, et al. : Evaluation of minor head injury in children. J Pediatr Surg 1994;29:851–854.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence: Head injury: Triage, assessment, investigation and early management of head injury in infants, children and adults (NICE clinical guideline 56), Available at http://www.nice.org.uk. ISBN 1-4629-476-2.Google Scholar