No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
General discussion led by George Nebolsine and Edgar Turlington
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 February 2017
Abstract
- Type
- Fourth Session
- Information
- Proceedings of the American Society of International Law at its annual meeting (1921-1969) , Volume 28 , 1934 , pp. 155 - 172
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Society of International Law 1934
References
1 Case of Serbian Loans, Judgment No. 14.
2 Case of the Brazilian Loans, Judgment No. 15.
3 See Feilcbenfeld, E., “Rights and Remedies of Holders of Foreign Bonds” in Quimby, Bonds and Bondholders (1934), §§636, 664Google Scholar.
4 Cited in W. H. Wynne, Peru: A Study of Foreign Debt Defaults and Readjustments (unpublished). See E. M. Borchard, Proceedings of this Society, 26th Meeting (1932), p. 135, for examples of priority.
5 W. H. Wynne, Bulgaria : A Study of Foreign Debt Defaults and Readjustments unpublished).
6 The potentialities of the “Gold Clause” problem are very far reaching and are particularly susceptible of judicial settlement. See Kuhn, A. K., “The Gold Clause in International Loans,” American Journal of International Law, Vol. 28 (1934), p. 312 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Nebolsine, , “The Gold Clause in Private Contracts,” 42 Yale Law Journal (1933), p. 1051 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
7 Correspondence respecting Position of British Holders of French Rentes issued in the united Kingdom in 1915-1918, France No. 1 (1931), Cmd. 3779. See H. B. Samuel, The French Default (1930).
8 5 Ch. D. 605 (1877), 36 L. T. R. (1877). See also, Ezra ». Lamont, 149 Misc. (N. Y.) 912 (1933), aff’d Appellate Division April 20, 1934.
9 Wynne, op. cit, note 4.
10 Ibid.