Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T19:37:39.307Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Jus in Bello and Jus ad Bellum

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2017

Frédéric Mégret
Frédéric Mégret*
Affiliation:
Canada Research Chair in the Law of Human Rights and Social Diversity, McGill University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
The Relationship Between Jus ad Bellum and Jus in Bello: Past, Present, Future
Information
Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting , Volume 100 , 2006 , pp. 121 - 123
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Needless to say, the jus ad bellum, however abolitionist of war it may be, abounds in that direction even more in considering that the only issue at stake is the regulation of interstate violence. Indeed, the idea of a “jus ad bellum of nonstate actors” is very alien to international legal thought (although I hope in the future to contribute to resurrecting the idea of resistance to tyranny as a motif of international law).