Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T18:11:19.328Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

DESIGNING SERIOUS GAMES TO UNDERSTAND THE CHALLENGES OF THE ANTHROPOCENE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 June 2023

Mathilde Boissier ,
Vincent Jost ,
Mathieu Mangeot  and
Léa Viénot
Mathilde Boissier
Affiliation:
INRIA / Laboratoire Jean Kuntzmann, equipe STEEP;
Vincent Jost
Affiliation:
INRIA / Laboratoire Jean Kuntzmann, equipe STEEP; Laboratoire G-Scop
Mathieu Mangeot*
Affiliation:
INRIA / Laboratoire Jean Kuntzmann, equipe STEEP;
Léa Viénot
Affiliation:
INRIA / Laboratoire Jean Kuntzmann, equipe STEEP;
*
Mangeot, Mathieu, INRIA, France, mathieu.mangeot@inria.fr

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The challenges of the Anthropocene require a deep transformation of the world's economic organization. In order to manage such a change, it is necessary to have a systemic vision of the resources, processes at stake and their interdependencies. One possible approach to modeling part of this complexity is biophysical flow accounting. One of the challenges is to involve populations in participatory processes. It is therefore important to understand the systemic effects. However, biophysical accounting tools remain too complicated.

This is why we have designed serious games to present the issues in a simple way, to articulate them with concrete experiences already lived by citizens and to take a step back, by mobilizing their participation, their emotions and the discussions.

The first game was designed to show the geographical transfer of pressure through the description of the steps leading to the purchase of a chicken, starting with the vegetable culture allowing to feed it.

The second game was designed to show the competition of use between resources. Designed as a board game, it also involves reflection on the cooperative and competitive aspects of many societal situations.

Keywords

SustainabilityMulti- / Cross- / Trans-disciplinary processesEducation
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 3: ICED23 , July 2023 , pp. 1397 - 1406
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

Becu, N. (2020), Les courants d'influence et la pratique de la simulation participative : contours, design et contributions aux changements societaux et organisationnels dans les territoires, Habilitation a diriger des recherches, La Rochelle Universite.Google Scholar
Biggs, R., De Vos, A., Preiser, R., Clements, H., Maciejewski, K. and Schluter, M. (2021), The Routledge handbook of research methods for social-ecological systems, Taylor & Francis.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Courtonne, J.Y. (2016), Environmental assessment of territories through supply chain analysis: biophysical accounting for deliberative decision-aiding, Ph.D. thesis, UGA.Google Scholar
Courtonne, J.Y., Longaretti, P., Alapetite, J. and Dupre, D. (2016), “Environmental pressures embodied in the french cereals supply chain”, Journal of Industrial Ecology, Vol. 20, pp. 423–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crookall, D. (2010), “Serious Games, Debriefing, and Simulation/Gaming as a Discipline”, Simulation & Gaming, Vol. 41 No. 6, pp. 898–920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crutzen, P.J. and Stoermer, E.F. (2021), The 'Anthropocene' (2000), Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp. 19–21.Google Scholar
Dare, W., Hassenforder, E. and Dray, A. (2020), Observation manual for collective serious games, CIRAD.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duke, R.D. (2014), Gaming: The Future's Language, wbv Media GmbH & Company KG.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hassenforder, E. and Ferrand, N. (2021), “Evaluer une demarche participative”, Sciences Eaux Territoires, Vol. 35 No. 1, pp. 90–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lardinois, E. (2000), Le jeu : outil de communication commerciale : conception de produits et formation des clients, Ph.D. thesis, Paris 13.Google Scholar
Mauviel, O. (2020), Analyse des flux de matieres pour la modelisation agricole - Vers la scenarisation d'alternatives, Master's thesis, Universite Claude Bernard Lyon 1.Google Scholar
Meadows, D. and Meadows, D. (1993), “Fish Banks news, Fish Banks limited and Laboratory for Interactive Learning”, Durham, NH, USA.Google Scholar
Meadows, D., Sweeney, L. and Mehers, G. (2016), “The climate change playbook: 22 systems thinking games for more effective communication about climate change”, Chelsea Green Publishing.Google Scholar
Raworth, K. (2013), Defining a Safe and Just Space for Humanity, Island Press/Center for Resource Economics, Washington, DC, pp. 28–38, http://doi.org/10.5822/978-1-61091-458-1_3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rotenberg, M. (2015), “Les Jeux de Societe : essai sur la production d'un outil d'analyse autour des mecaniques de jeu”, Universite Paris 13.Google Scholar
Teuber, K. (1995), “Les colons de Catane”, Jeux Descartes. https://www.regledujeu.fr/catane/Google Scholar
Vienot, L. and Boissier, M. (2022a), “The chicken game”, INRIA. https://steep.inria.fr/chicken-game.zipGoogle Scholar
Vienot, L. and Boissier, M. (2022b), “Cooperate or compete”, INRIA. https://steep.inria.fr/cooperate-or-compete.zipGoogle Scholar
de la Ville, V.I., Brougere, G. and Boireau, N. (2010), “How can food become fun? exploring and testing possibilities...”, Young Consumers, Vol. 11 No. 2, pp. 117–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar