Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-x5cpj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-26T20:23:17.988Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

FILE FORMAT SELECTION FOR EFFICIENT DIGITAL PROCESS CHAINS IN ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 June 2023

Slim Krueckemeier*
Affiliation:
Product Life Cycle Management, Technical University of Darmstadt, 64287 Darmstadt, Germany
Reiner Anderl
Affiliation:
Product Life Cycle Management, Technical University of Darmstadt, 64287 Darmstadt, Germany
Benjamin Schleich
Affiliation:
Product Life Cycle Management, Technical University of Darmstadt, 64287 Darmstadt, Germany
*
Krueckemeier, Slim, Technical University of Darmstadt, Germany, krueckemeier@plcm.tu-darmstadt.de

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Selecting a suitable file format for data exchange in additive manufacturing is fundamental when designing these digital process chains. Within the scope of this investigation, alternatives to the de-facto industry standard STL are to be found to overcome the disadvantages of the STL-based digital process chain.

Therefore, suitable file formats are identified by conducting literature and market research and evaluated regarding their suitability to support a continuous digital process chain. In addition, typical use cases in additive manufacturing are defined, and their requirements for a file format for data exchange are derived. Finally, for each use case defined, recommended and suitable file formats are proposed.

Type
Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

Bonnard, R. (2018), “An Advanced STEP-NC Platform for Additive Manufacturing”, in Meboldt, M. and Klahn, C. (Eds.), Industrializing Additive Manufacturing - Proceedings of Additive Manufacturing in Products and Applications - AMPA2017, Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp. 127136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonnard, R., Hascoët, J.-Y., Mognol, P. and Stroud, I. (2018), “STEP-NC digital thread for additive manufacturing: data model, implementation and validation”, International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, Vol. 31 No. 11, pp. 11411160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gartzia González, R. and Barreiro García, J. (2019), “Modelling of Information for Additive Manufacture (AP242) and Comparative with Other Existing Models”, American Scientific Research Journal for Engineering, Technology, and Sciences (ASRJETS), Vol. 54 No. 1, pp. 6881.Google Scholar
Gebhardt, A. (2016), Additive Fertigungsverfahren: Additive Manufacturing und 3D-Drucken für Prototyping - Tooling - Produktion, 5., neu bearbeitete und erweiterte Auflage, Hanser, München.Google Scholar
Gebhardt, A., Kessler, J. and Thurn, L. (2019), 3D printing: Understanding additive manufacturing, 2nd Edition, Carl Hanser Verlag GmbH & Co. KG, Munich, Cincinnati.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghadai, S., Jignasu, A. and Krishnamurthy, A. (2021), “Direct 3D printing of multi-level voxel models”, Additive Manufacturing, Vol. 40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, I., Rosen, D. and Stucker, B. (2015), Additive Manufacturing Technologies, Springer New York, New York, NY.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gonzalez, J., Forsyth, M., Weismann, M. and Wright, S. (2018a), “3MF Beam Lattice Extension. Specification & Reference Guide”, available at: https://github.com/3MFConsortium/spec_beamlattice/blob/master/3MF%20Beam%20Lattice%20Extension.md (accessed 2 May 2021).Google Scholar
Gonzalez, J., Weismann, M. and Wright, S. (2018b), “3D Manufacturing Format. Core Specification & Reference Guide”, available at: https://github.com/3MFConsortium/spec_core/blob/master/3MF%20Core%20Specification.md (accessed 23 April 2021).Google Scholar
Gonzalez, J., Weismann, M. and Wright, S. (2018c), “3D Manufacturing Format. Materials and Properties Extension”, available at: https://github.com/3MFConsortium/spec_materials/blob/master/3MF%20Materials%20Extension.md (accessed 2 May 2021).Google Scholar
Gonzalez, J. and Wright, S. (2018), “3MF Production Extension. Specification & Reference Guide”, availableat: https://github.com/3MFConsortium/spec_production/blob/master/3MF%20Production%20Extension.md (accessed 2 May 2021).Google Scholar
Hull, C.W. (1984), Apparatus for production of three-dimensional objects by Stereolithography: Patentschrift No. US4575330A.Google Scholar
International Organization for Standardization (2020), Specification for Additive Manufacturing File Format (AMF) Version 1.2, 25.030; 35.240.50 No. 52915, 2020th ed.Google Scholar
Kim, D.B., Witherell, P., Lipman, R. and Feng, S.C. (2015), “Streamlining the additive manufacturing digital spectrum: A systems approach”, Additive Manufacturing, Vol. 5, pp. 2030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, D.B., Witherell, P., Lu, Y. and Feng, S. (2017), “Toward a Digital Thread and Data Package for Metals-Additive Manufacturing”, Smart and sustainable manufacturing systems, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 7599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krückemeier, S., Staudter, G. and Anderl, R. (2021), “Determining the Optimal Orientation of AM-Parts Based on Native 3D CAD Data”, in Trzcielinski, S., Mrugalska, B., Karwowski, W., Rossi, E. and Di Nicolantonio, M. (Eds.), Advances in Manufacturing, Production Management and Process Control, Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, Vol. 274, Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp. 39.Google Scholar
Kumar, S. (2020), Additive Manufacturing Processes, Springer International Publishing, Cham.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leutenecker-Twelsiek, B., Klahn, C. and Meboldt, M. (2016), “Considering Part Orientation in Design for Additive Manufacturing”, Procedia CIRP, Vol. 50, pp. 408413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipman, R.R. and McFarlane, J.S. (2015), “Exploring Model-Based Engineering Concepts for Additive Manufacturing”, Proceedings of the 26th Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium.Google Scholar
Lu, Y., Choi, S. and Witherell, P. (2016), “Towards an Integrated Data Schema Design for Additive Manufacturing: Conceptual Modeling”, in Proceedings of the ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference - 2015, August 2-5, 2015, Boston, Massachusetts, USA, The American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, N.Y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mies, D., Marsden, W. and Warde, S. (2016), “Overview of Additive Manufacturing Informatics: “A Digital Thread””, Integrating Materials and Manufacturing Innovation, Vol. 5 No. 1, pp. 114142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milaat, F., Witherell, P., Hardwick, M., Yeung, H., Ferrero, V., Monnier, L. and Brown, M. (2022a), “STEP-NC Compliant Data Representations for Powder Bed Fusion in Additive Manufacturing”, in Proceedings of ASME 2022 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference (IDETC-CIE 2022): August 14-17, 2022, St. Louis, Missouri, 8/14/2022 - 8/17/2022, St. Louis, Missouri, USA, The American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, N.Y.Google Scholar
Milaat, F.A., Witherell, P., Hardwick, M., Yeung, H., Ferrero, V., Monnier, L. and Brown, M. (2022b), “STEP-NC Process Planning for Powder Bed Fusion Additive Manufacturing”, Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering, Vol. 22 No. 6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pasterk, M. (2018), Entwicklung einer CAx-Prozesskette für additive Fertigung von Bauteilen aus Metall, Wien.Google Scholar
Qin, Y., Qi, Q., Scott, P.J. and Jiang, X. (2019), “Status, comparison, and future of the representations of additive manufacturing data”, Computer-Aided Design, Vol. 111, pp. 4464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodriguez, E. and Alvares, A. (2019), “A STEP-NC implementation approach for additive manufacturing”, Procedia Manufacturing, Vol. 38, pp. 916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savio, G., Meneghello, R., Rosso, S. and Concheri, G. (2019), “3D Model Representation and Data Exchange for Additive Manufacturing”, in Cavas-Martínez, F., Eynard, B., Fernández Cañavate, F.J., Fernández-Pacheco, D.G., Morer, P. and Nigrelli, V. (Eds.), Advances on Mechanics, Design Engineering and Manufacturing II, Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering, Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp. 412421.Google Scholar
Venkiteswaran, A., Hejazi, S.M., Biswas, D., Shah, J.J. and Davidson, J.K. (2016), “Semantic Interoperability of GD&T Data Through ISO 10303 Step AP242”, in American Society of Mechanical Engineers Digital Collection.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verein Deutscher Ingenieure e.V. (2014-11-00), Additive Fertigungsverfahren: Grundlagen, Begriffe, Verfahrensbeschreibungen, Vol. 25.020 No. 3405, 2014-12, Beuth Verlag GmbH, Berlin.Google Scholar
Wang, C.-S. and Chang, T.-R. (2008), “Re-triangulation in STL meshes for rapid prototyping and manufacture”, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 37 No. 7-8, pp. 770781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, T. and Cheung, E.H.M. (2006), “Enhanced STL”, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 29 No. 11-12, pp. 11431150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xiao, J., Anwer, N., Durupt, A., Le Duigou, J. and Eynard, B. (2018), “Information exchange standards for design, tolerancing and Additive Manufacturing: a research review”, International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM), Vol. 12 No. 2, pp. 495504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xiao, J., Eynard, B., Anwer, N., Durupt, A., Le Duigou, J. and Danjou, C. (2021), “STEP/STEP-NC-compliant manufacturing information of 3D printing for FDM technology”, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 112 No. 5-6, pp. 17131728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar