No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
INCREASING STUDENT CONFIDENCE THROUGH EXPERIENTIAL DESIGN EXERCISES IN ENGINEERING SCIENCE COURSES
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 June 2023
Abstract
Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
This study investigates the impact on student confidence of completing in-lecture engineering design activities focused on the application of specific engineering science topics within a materials engineering course. Many times, engineering science courses are taught with the expectation that the course content can be easily translated by students at a later time to apply in engineering design activities. By measuring student self-reported confidence across several related topics before and after completion of the in-lecture design exercises the impact of the exercises on student confidence has been quantified. On average, students have a lower than desired confidence in applying the specific materials engineering topics to a design problem after completing only the course content on the subject. Following completion of the related seventy-five minute design exercise, student confidence increased by a statistically significant degree. These results suggest that close integration of topical content learning with design application activity may be a useful method to improve engineering student confidence and, by extension, retention.
- Type
- Article
- Information
- Creative Commons
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.- Copyright
- The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press
References
Alias, M. and Hafir, N.A.H.M., 2009. The relationship between academic self-confidence and cognitive performance among engineering students. In Proceedings of the Research in Engineering Education Symposium (pp. 1–6).Google Scholar
Besterfield-Sacre, M., Amaya, N.Y., Shuman, L.J., Atman, C.J. and Porter, R.L., 1998, November. Understanding student confidence as it relates to first year achievement. In FIE'98. 28th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference. Moving from 'Teacher-Centered' to 'Learner-Centered' Education. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No. 98CH36214) (Vol. 1, pp. 258–263). IEEE. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/FIE.1998.736844CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brennan, R.W., Hugo, R.J. and Gu, P., 2013. Reinforcing skills and building student confidence through a multicultural project-based learning experience. Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, 19(1), pp.75–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.7158/D12-015.2013.19.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cech, E., Rubineau, B., Silbey, S. and Seron, C., 2011. Professional role confidence and gendered persistence in engineering. American sociological review, 76(5), pp.641–666. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0003122411420815CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chachra, D. and Kilgore, D., 2009. Exploring Gender and Self-Confidence in Engineering Students: A Multi-Method Approach. Research Brief. Center for the Advancement of Engineering Education (NJ1).Google Scholar
Colbeck, C.L., Cabrera, A.F. and Terenzini, P.T., 2001. Learning professional confidence: Linking teaching practices, students' self-perceptions, and gender. The Review of Higher Education, 24(2), pp.173–191. http://dx.doi.org/10.18260/1-2--5594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dym, C.L., Agogino, A.M., Eris, O., Frey, D.D. and Leifer, L.J., 2005. Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning. Journal of engineering education, 94(1), pp.103–120. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00832.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, G.W., Scordilis, G.E. and Cooke, C.M., 2003, November. New pedagogical approaches in engineering mechanics yield increased student understanding, confidence, and commitment. In 33rd Annual Frontiers in Education, 2003. FIE 2003. (Vol. 1, pp. T4A–15). IEEE. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2003.1263361Google Scholar
Geisinger, B.N. and Raman, D.R., 2013. Why they leave: Understanding student attrition from engineering majors. International Journal of Engineering Education, 29(4), pp.914–925.Google Scholar
Kolb, D.A. and Plovnick, M.S., 1974. The experiential learning theory of career development.Google Scholar
Litzler, E., Samuelson, C.C. and Lorah, J.A., 2014. Breaking it down: Engineering student STEM confidence at the intersection of race/ethnicity and gender. Research in Higher Education, 55(8), pp.810–832. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11162-014-9333-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKenna, A. and Hirsch, P., 2005, June. Evaluating student confidence in engineering design, teamwork and communication. In 2005 Annual Conference (pp. 10–592).Google Scholar
Moakler, M.W. Jr and Kim, M.M., 2014. College major choice in STEM: Revisiting confidence and demographic factors. The Career Development Quarterly, 62(2), pp.128–142. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-0045.2014.00075.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parsons, S., Croft, T. and Harrison, M., 2009. Does students’ confidence in their ability in mathematics matter?. Teaching Mathematics and its Applications: An International Journal of the IMA, 28(2), pp.53–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/teamat/hrp010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yadav, A., Alexander, V. and Mehta, S., 2019. Case-based Instruction in Undergraduate Engineering: Does student confidence predict learning. International Journal of Engineering Education, 35(1), pp.25–34.Google Scholar
You have
Access
Open access