Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T06:04:34.904Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

INDIVIDUALIZATION IN ENGINEERING DESIGN EDUCATION: IMPLEMENTATION OF AN ADAPTIVE E-LEARNING ENVIRONMENT (ADE-LE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 June 2023

Frederike Kossack  and
Beate Bender
Frederike Kossack*
Affiliation:
Ruhr-Universität Bochum
Beate Bender
Affiliation:
Ruhr-Universität Bochum
*
Kossack, Frederike, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Germany, kossack@lpe.rub.de

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Well-educated engineers are key for successful engineering design in product development. Due to varying school education and technical backgrounds, the students have different prerequisites for the acquisition of competences. Subject of this paper is to show the methodical implementation of the prototype AdE-Le suited to the curriculum at Ruhr-University-Bochum and the open source learning platform Moodle. Aim is to evaluate the didactic potential to support engineering students with heterogeneous competence levels. The general needs and existing approaches for E-Learning environments as a means to individualize learning content in engineering design are discussed. Major aim is to reduce the linkage between the students' technical background and their exam success. AdE-Le as an exemplary application is developed based on the didactical concept of Constructive Alignment. Due to a harmonization of learning methods and contents in Engineering Design across the members of the Scientific Society for Product Development the results of this investigation can be transferred to other Universities.

Keywords

Design engineeringDesign educationEducation
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 3: ICED23 , July 2023 , pp. 2295 - 2304
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

Albers, A., Denkena, B. and Matthiesen, S. (2012), Faszination Konstruktion: Berufsbild und Tätigkeitsfeld im Wandel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnold, P., Kilian, L., Thillosen, A.M. and Zimmer, G.M. (2018), Handbuch E-Learning: Lehren und Lernen mit digitalen Medien, utb Pädagogik, Vol. 4965, 5. Auflage, W. Bertelsmann Verlag, Bielefeld.Google Scholar
Arnold, R. (2015a), Bildung nach Bologna!, Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-08978-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnold, R. (2015b), Systemische Berufsbildung: Kompetenzentwicklung neu denken - mit einem Methoden-ABC, Systhemia, Band 4, 2., unveränderte Auflage, Schneider Verlag Hohengehren GmbH, Baltmannsweiler.Google Scholar
Arnold, R. and Tutor, C.G. (2006), “Möglichkeiten der Einschätzung von Selbstlernkometenz”, in Euler, D., Lang, M. and Pätzold, G. (Eds.), Selbstgesteuertes Lernen in der beruflichen Bildung, Zeitschrift für Berufs- und Wirtschaftspädagogik (ZBW) Beihefte, Franz Steiner Verlag, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Baumann, C. and Benzing, T. (2013), “Output-Orientierung und Kompetenzformulierung im Bologna-Prozess”, available at: https://www.uni-wuerzburg.de/fileadmin/39030000/ZiLS/Material/Kompetenzorientierung/Kompetenzformulierung_15.10.2013.pdf (accessed 13.11.21).Google Scholar
Berger, S. and Moser, U. (2020), “Adaptives Lernen und Testen”, Journal für lehrerInnenbildung jlb 01-2020 Digitalisierung https://doi.org/10.35468/jlb-01-2020_03.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biggs, J.B. and Tang, C.S.-k. (2011), Teaching for quality learning at university: What the student does, UK Higher Education OUP Humanities and Social Sciences Higher Education OUP Ser, 4th edition, McGraw-Hill/Open University Press, Maidenhead.Google Scholar
Brahm, T., Jenert, T. and Wagner, D. (2014), “Nicht für alle gleich: subjektive Wahrnehmungen des Übergangs Schule - Hochschule”, Zeitschrift für Hochschulentwicklung, Vol. 9 No. 5 https://doi.org/10.3217/zfhe-9-05/04.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conrad, K.-J. (2019), Grundlagen der Konstruktionslehre: Maschinenbau-Anwendungen und Orientierung auf Menschen; mit 104 Tabellen, zahlreichen Kenntnisfragen und Aufgabenstellungen mit Lösungen, Ciando library, 7., aktualisierte und erweiterte Auflage, Hanser; Ciando, München.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckert, C., Seifried, E. and Spinath, B. (2015), “Heterogenität in der Hochschule aus psychologischer Sicht: Die Rolle der studentischen Eingangsvoraussetzungen für adaptives Lehren”, in Rheinländer, K. (Ed.), Ungleichheitssensible Hochschullehre, Vol. 11, Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden, pp. 257–274 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-09477-5_14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maschinenbau, Fakultät (2022), “Praktikum”, available at: https://www.mb.rub.de/studium/praktikum/ (accessed 27 November 2022).Google Scholar
Fidalgo-Blanco, A., Luisa, Sein-Echaluce Maria, Garcia-Penalvo, F.J. and Conde-Gonzalez, M.A. (2014), “Learning content management systems for the definition of adaptive learning environments”, in 2014 International Symposium on Computers in Education (SIIE): 12 - 14 Nov. 2014, Logroño, La Rioja, Spain, IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, pp. 105–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
H5P Contributors (2022), available at: https://h5p.org/.Google Scholar
Handke, J. (2020), Handbuch Hochschullehre Digital: Leitfaden für eine moderne und mediengerechte Lehre, 3., aktualisierte und erweiterte Auflage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoppe, L.V., Gembarski, P.C. and Lachmayer, R. (2021), “Intelligent tutoring system as a tool of formative assessment in design education”, in DS 110: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education (EPDE 2021), 9th and 10th September 2021, The Design Society https://doi.org/10.35199/EPDE.2021.40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jungmann, T., Ossenberg, P. and Wissemann, S. (2016), “Begriffsklärung zur Kompetenzorientierung”, in Frerich, S., Meisen, T., Richert, A., Petermann, M., Jeschke, S., Wilkesmann, U. and Tekkaya, A.E. (Eds.), Engineering Education 4.0, Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp. 863–868 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46916-4_70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kannengiesser, U., Gero, J., Wells, J. and Lammi, M. (2015), “Do high school students benefit from pre-engineering design education?”, paper presented at International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED15), 27.-30.07.2015, Milan.Google Scholar
Kattwinkel, D., Song, Y.-W. and Bender, B. (2018), “Analysis of ecodesign and sustainable design in higher education”, in Proceedings of the DESIGN 2018 15th International Design Conference, May, 21-24, 2018, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Naval Architecture, University of Zagreb, Croatia; The Design Society, Glasgow, UK, pp. 2451–2460 https://doi.org/10.21278/idc.2018.0305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerr, P. (2016), “Adaptive learning”, ELT Journal, Vol. 70 No. 1, pp. 88–93 https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccv055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolekar, S.V., Pai, R.M. and M. M., M.P. (2019), “Rule based adaptive user interface for adaptive E-learning system”, Education and Information Technologies, Vol. 24 No. 1, pp. 613–641 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9788-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolekar, S.V., Pai, R.M. and Pai, M.M., M. (2018), “Adaptive User Interface for Moodle based E-learning System using Learning Styles”, Procedia Computer Science, Vol. 135 No. 17, pp. 606–615 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.08.226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kossack, F. and Bender, B. (2022), “Heterogeneous groups of students as a challenge in engineering design education”, in DS 119: Proceedings of the 33rd Symposium Design for X (DFX2022), 22 and 23 September 2022, The Design Society, p. 10 https://doi.org/10.35199/dfx2022.07.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kossack, F., Kattwinkel, D. and Bender, B. (2022), “Adaptive E-Learning for the Engineering Design Education at Ruhr-University Bochum”, Proceedings of the Design Society, Vol. 2, pp. 2313–2322 https://doi.org/10.1017/pds.2022.234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krathwohl, D.R. (2002), “A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy: An Overview”, Theory into practice, Vol. 41 No. 4, pp. 212–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, H.O. and Hertnagel, J. (2009), Lernzielüberprüfung im eLearning, Oldenbourg, München https://doi.org/10.1524/9783486848984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metraglia, R., Baronio, G. and Villa, V. (2015a), “Issues in learning engineering graphics fundamentals: shall we blame cad?”, paper presented at International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED15), 27.-30.07.2015, Milan.Google Scholar
Metraglia, R., Valerio, Villa, Gabriele, Baronio and Adamini, R. (2015b), “High School Graphics Experience Influencing the Self-Efficacy of First-Year Engineering Students in an Introductory Engineering Graphics Course”, Engineering Design Graphics Journal (EDGJ), No. Vol. 79 No.3.Google Scholar
Contributors, Moodle (2022), “Fragetyp STACK”, available at: https://docs.moodle.org/400/de/Fragetyp_STACK (accessed 29 November 2022).Google Scholar
Niegemann, H.M. and Heidig, S. (2019), “Interaktivität und Adaptivität in multimedialen Lernumgebungen”, in Niegemann, H. and Weinberger, A. (Eds.), Lernen mit Bildungstechnologien, Springer Reference Psychologie, Vol. 73, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 1–25 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-54373-3_33-1.Google Scholar
Pfäffli, B.K. (2015), Lehren an Hochschulen: Eine Hochschuldidaktik für den Aufbau von Wissen und Kompetenzen, UTB Schlüsselkompetenzen Hochschuldidaktik, Vol. 4325, 2., überarb. und erw. Aufl., Haupt, Bern.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prusty, B.G. and Russell, C. (2011), “Engaging students in learning threshold concepts in engineering mechanics: adaptive eLearning tutorials”, ICEE.Google Scholar
Rey, G.D. (2009), E-Learning: Theorien, Gestaltungsempfehlungen und Forschung, Psychologie-Lehrbuch, 1. Auflage, Verlag Hans Huber, Bern.Google Scholar
Rusak, Z. (2017), “Exploitation of micro-learning for generating personalized learning paths”, in Proceedings of the 21th International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED17) Vol. 9: Design Education 21.-25.08.2017, Vancouver, Canada.Google Scholar
Schindler, S. (2014), Wege zur Studienberechtigung – Wege ins Studium?, Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-03841-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoyanov, S. and Kirschener, P. (2004), “Expert Concept Mapping Method for Defining the Characteristics of Adaptive E-Learning: ALFANET Project Case”, ETR&D, Vol. 52 No. 2, pp. 41–56.Google Scholar
Terkowsky, C., Frye, S., Haertel, T., May, D., Wilkemann, U. and Jahnke, I. (2018), “Technik- und Ingenieurdidaktik in der hochschulischen Bildung”, in Pittich, D., Zinn, B. and Tenberg, R. (Eds.), Technikdidaktik: Eine Bestandsaufnahme, Franz Steiner Verlag, pp. 87–97.Google Scholar
Wildt, J. and Wildt, B. (2011), “Lernprozessorientiertes Prüfen im „Constructive Alignment “. Ein Beitrag zur Förderung der Qualität von Hochschulbildung durch eine Weiterentwicklung …”, in Behrendt, B., Voss, H.-P and Wildt, J. (Eds.), Neues Handbuch Hochschullehre, Teil H: Prüfungen und Leistungskontrollen. Weiterentwicklung des Prüfungssystems in der Konsequenz des Bologna-Prozesses, Raabe, Berlin, pp. 1–46.Google Scholar
Wissenschaftliche Gesellschaft für Produktentwicklung WiGeP e.V. (2018), Universitäre Lehre in der Produkentwicklung: Leifaden der Wissenschaftlichen Geselschaft für Produktentwicklung (WiGeP).Google Scholar
Žeželj, D. and Miler, D. (2018), “Manufacturing technology-based approach to teaching engineering drawing”, in Proceedings of the DESIGN 2018 15th International Design Conference, May, 21-24, 2018, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Naval Architecture, University of Zagreb, Croatia; The Design Society, Glasgow, UK, pp. 2553–2562 https://doi.org/10.21278/idc.2018.0530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar