Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T05:23:16.016Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Proposal of a Conceptual Framework for Collaborative Design of Immersive Professional Training: Application to the Textile Industry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 May 2022

I. Bisson ,
M. Mahdjoub ,
M. Zare ,
J.-B. Bluntzer ,
J.-C. Sagot ,
F. Goutaudier  and
F. Ravier
I. Bisson*
Affiliation:
UTBM-University of Bourgogne Franche-Comte, France Stäubli, France
M. Mahdjoub
Affiliation:
UTBM-University of Bourgogne Franche-Comte, France
M. Zare
Affiliation:
UTBM-University of Bourgogne Franche-Comte, France
J.-B. Bluntzer
Affiliation:
UTBM-University of Bourgogne Franche-Comte, France
J.-C. Sagot
Affiliation:
UTBM-University of Bourgogne Franche-Comte, France
F. Goutaudier
Affiliation:
Stäubli, France
F. Ravier
Affiliation:
Stäubli, France
*
i.bisson@staubli.com

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Immersive technologies have an increasing use in professional training. However, the usability of applications has limits due to a lack of consideration of end users in the design of these new supports. This paper reviews the literature and discovers that few approaches offer to include different collaborators' work, or the end user, in the design process. This study proposes a conceptual framework design for immersive professional training (IPT) and its application in the textile industry.

Keywords

collaborative designvirtual reality (VR)user-centred designprofessional training
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 2: DESIGN2022 , May 2022 , pp. 111 - 120
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2022.

References

Akçayır, M. and Akçayır, G. (2017), “Advantages and challenges associated with augmented reality for education: A systematic review of the literature”, Educational Research Review, Vol. 20, pp. 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alben, L. (1996), “Defining the Criteria for Effective Interaction Design”, p. 5.Google Scholar
Arnaldi, B., Guitton, P., Moreau, G. and Fuchs, P. (2018), Réalité virtuelle et réalité augmentée: mythes et réalités.Google Scholar
Bennes, L., Bazzaro, F. and Sagot, J.-C. (2011), “Réflexions sur une méthodologie de conception de techniques d'interaction en réalité virtuelle dédiées à la collaboration inter-métier”.Google Scholar
Bersier, J.P. (1995), “IDEF3, Méthode de description des processus, description, application industrielle, perspectives”.Google Scholar
Boccara, V. (2018), “Training design oriented by works analysis”, Beyond Safety Training, Springer, Cham, pp. 117–126.Google Scholar
Boccara, V. and Delgoulet, C. (2015), “L'analyse des travails pour la conception en formation: Contribution de l'ergonomie à l'orientation de la conception amont d'un environnement virtuel pour la formation”, Activites, Vol. 12 No. 2, available at:10.4000/activites.1098.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boujut, J.-F. and Blanco, E. (2003), “Intermediary objects as a means to foster co-operation in engineering design”, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), Vol. 12 No. 2, pp. 205–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boutigny, E. (2004), “Coopération dans l'entreprise et compétence collective”, Actes Du 15e Congres de l'AGRH, Vol. 3, pp. 1328–1342.Google Scholar
Burkhardt, J.-M., Bardy, B. and Lourdeaux, D. (2003), “Immersion, Réalisme et Présence dans la conception et l’évaluation des Environnements Virtuels (Immersion, Realism and Presence in the design and evaluation of Virtual Environments)”, . . Immersion, p. 10.Google Scholar
Cross, N. (2008), Engineering Design Methods: Strategies for Product Design, 4th ed., J. Wiley, Chichester, England; Hoboken, NJ.Google Scholar
Delgoulet, C., Boccara, V., Carpentier, K. and Lourdeaux, D. (2015), “How designing a virtual environment for professional training from an activity framework?”, Proceedings 19th Triennial Congress of TheInternational Ergonomics Association, Melbourne, Australia, available at: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01253409.Google Scholar
Frejus, Drouin, Thibault, and Schmid. (1997), “Conception de systèmes de réalité virtuelle pour la formation d'agents de maintenance.”, Congrès de La SELF, Lyon, France.Google Scholar
Fuchs, P., Moreau, G., Burkhardt, J.-M. and Coquillart, S. (2006), Le traité de la réalité virtuelle - Volume 2: L'interfaçage, l'immersion et l'interaction en environnement virtuel, 3rd ed., Transvalor - Presses des mines, Paris.Google Scholar
Ganier, F., Hoareau, C. and Devillers, F. (2013), “Évaluation des performances et de la charge de travail induits par l'apprentissage de procédures de maintenance en environnement virtuel”, Le travail humain, Vol. 76 No. 4, p. 335.Google Scholar
Gartner. (2018), “Gartner Top 10 Strategic Technology Trends for 2019”, 15 October, available at: https://www.gartner.com/smarterwithgartner/gartner-top-10-strategic-technology-trends-for-2019/ (accessed 18 April 2019).Google Scholar
Gero, J.S., Mc Neill, T., 1998. An approach to the analysis of design protocols. Design Studies 19, 21–61. 10.1016/S0142-694X(97)00015-X”. (n.d.). .Google Scholar
Lallemand, C., Gronier, G. and Dugué, M. (2018), Méthodes de design UX: 30 méthodes fondamentales pour concevoir des expériences optimales, 2e éd., Eyrolles, Paris.Google Scholar
Loup-Escande, E., Burkhardt, J.-M., Christofol, H., O, CHRISTMANN. and Richir, S. (2011), “La méthode I2I ‘pour l'utilité’: fondements et application à la conception d'une application de réalité virtuelle”, 9e Congrès International de Génie Industriel, Canada, available at: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00782406 (accessed 5 November 2019).Google Scholar
Loup-Escande, É., Burkhardt, J.-M. and Richir, S. (2013a), “Anticiper et évaluer l'utilité dans la conception ergonomique des technologies émergentes: une revue”, Le travail humain, Vol. 76 No. 1, pp. 27–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loup-Escande, E., Dominjon, L., Perret, D., Erhel, S., Jamet, É., Michinov, N., Andriot, C., et al. (2013b), “La démarche de Conception Centrée-Utilisateur en Réalité Virtuelle: l'exemple du projet VirtualiTeach”.Google Scholar
Loup-Escande, E., Jamet, É., Ragot, M., Erhel, S. and Michinov, N. (2015a), “Comment concevoir une plate-forme ergonomique de réalité virtuelle pour l'apprentissage de concepts scientifiques?”, Saint-Jacut-de-la-Mer, France.Google Scholar
Loup-Escande, É., Jamet, É., Ragot, M., Erhel, S., Michinov, N., Peltier, C. and Lopez, T. (2015b), “Concevoir des environnements virtuels éducatifs avec les utilisateurs finaux: Exemple du projet VirtualiTeach”, Terminal, No. 117, available at:10.4000/terminal.1093.Google Scholar
Lourdeaux, D., Fuchs, P., Burkhardt, J.-M. and Bernard, F. (2002), “Relevance of an intelligent tutorial agent for virtual reality training systems”, International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Lifelong Learning, Vol. 12 No. 1/2/3/4, p. 214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettey, C. (2018), 3 Reasons Why VR and AR Are Slow to Take Off, available at: //www.gartner.com/smarterwithgartner/3-reasons-why-vr-and-ar-are-slow-to-take-off/ (accessed 3 October 2019).Google Scholar
Richir, S. and Fuchs, P. (2006), “LA MÉTHODE: «Interaction et Immersion pour l'Innovation»”, Techniques de l'ingénieur Réalité Virtuelle, Vol. base documentaire: TIB299DUO. No. ref. article: te5910, available at: https://www.techniques-ingenieur.fr/base-documentaire/technologies-de-l-information-th9/realite-virtuelle-42299210/la-methode-interaction-et-immersion-pour-l-innovation-te5910/.Google Scholar
Richir, S., Fuchs, P., Lourdeaux, D., Millet, D., Buche, C. and Querrec, R. (2015), “How to design compelling Virtual Reality or Augmented Reality experience?”, Vol. 15 No. 1, p. 13.Google Scholar
Rogalski, Samurçay and. (1998), “Exploitation didactique des situations de simulation”, Le Travail Humain, Vol. 61 No. 4, pp. 333–359.Google Scholar
Shen, W., Hao, Q. and Li, W. (2008), “Computer supported collaborative design: Retrospective and perspective”, Computers in Industry, Vol. 59 No. 9, pp. 855–862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vinck, D. and Jeantet, A. (1995), “Mediating and Commissioning Objects in the Sociotechnical Process of Product Design: a conceptual approach”, in MACLEAN (Donald), SAVIOTTI (Paolo), and VINCK (Dominique) (Eds.), Designs, Networks and Strategies, Directorate General Science, R&D, pp. 111–129.Google Scholar
Zaïbet, O. (2006), “Collaboration dans l'entreprise et intelligence collective”, presented at the XVème Conférence Internationale de Management Stratégique, Annecy, France, p. 28.Google Scholar