No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Selecting Design Process Modelling Approaches for Building Design: A Review
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 26 May 2022
Abstract
Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Design process modelling is well-founded in fields of mechanical engineering, and product design and development but not in Building Design (BD). This paper looks at the selection process when choosing appropriate models for specific BD processes. The paper adapts process model selection criteria from Trauer's work and combines it with anecdotal evidence from the authors to select these models. The selection criteria were ranked, categorised, and applied to BD processes explained. Process models related to each selection criteria were then selected from backward snowballing of literature.
- Type
- Article
- Information
- Creative Commons
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.- Copyright
- The Author(s), 2022.
References
Austin, S., Baldwin, A., Li, B. and Waskett, P. (2000) “Analytical design planning technique (ADePT): a dependency structure matrix tool to schedule the building design process”, Construction Management & Economics, 18(2), 173–182Google Scholar
BCA (2021) Building Plan Submission, available: https://www1.bca.gov.sg/regulatory-info/building-control/building-plan-submission [accessed 15 November ].Google Scholar
BCA (2021) Structural Plans and Permit Approvals, available: https://www1.bca.gov.sg/regulatory-info/building-control/structural-plans-and-permit-approvals [accessed 15 November].Google Scholar
Browning, T. R. (1998) Modeling and analyzing cost, schedule, and performance in complex system product development, unpublished thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Sloan School of ManagementGoogle Scholar
Browning, T. R. and Eppinger, S. D. (2002) “Modeling impacts of process architecture on cost and schedule risk in product development”, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 49(4), 428–442Google Scholar
Cooper, K. G. (1980) “Naval ship production: A claim settled and a framework built”, Interfaces, 10(6), 20–36Google Scholar
Eppinger, S. D., Whitney, D. E., Smith, R. P. and Gebala, D. A. (1994) “A model-based method for organizing tasks in product development”, Research in Engineering Design, 6(1), 1–13Google Scholar
Ernstsen, S. K. (2020) “Designing for disruption: Exploring how digital technologies affect the future of construction”, PhD Thesis, Technical University of DenmarkGoogle Scholar
Hughes, W. (2001) “Evaluating plans of work”, Engineering Construction and Architectural Management, Volume 8, Issue 4, pp.272–283Google Scholar
Kaschek, R., Pavlov, R., Shekhovtsov, V. A. and Zlatkin, S. (2006) “Towards selecting among business process modeling methodologies”, in Business Information Systems–9th International Conference on Business Information Systems (BIS 2006), Gesellschaft für Informatik eV,Google Scholar
Laitinen, J. (1998) Model based construction process management, unpublished PhD thesis, Institutionen för fastigheter och byggande, Royal Institute of Technology, DenmarkGoogle Scholar
Marengo, E., Dallasega, P., Montali, M. and Nutt, W. (2016) “Process Modelling in Construction: a Formal Approach”, in Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering, 1–15Google Scholar
Ouertani, M.-Z. and Gzara, L. (2008) “Tracking product specification dependencies in collaborative design for conflict management”, Computer-Aided Design, 40(7), 828–837Google Scholar
Quanjel, E. (2013) “Collaborative design support - Workshops to stimulate interaction and knowledge exchange between practitioners, PhD thesis, Eindhoven University, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
Robin, V., Rose, B. and Girard, P. (2007) “Modelling collaborative knowledge to support engineering design project manager”, Computers in industry, 58(2), 188–198Google Scholar
Shah, J. J., Jeon, D. K., Urban, S. D., Bliznakov, P. and Rogers, M. (1996) “Database infrastructure for supporting engineering design histories”, Computer-Aided Design, 28(5), 347–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, R. P. and Eppinger, S. D. (1997) “Identifying controlling features of engineering design iteration”, Management Science, 43(3), 276–293Google Scholar
Trauer, J., Wöhr, F., Eckert, C., Kannengiesser, U., Knippenberg, S., Sankowski, O. and Zimmermann, M. (2021) “Criteria for Selecting Design Process Modelling Approaches”, Proceedings of the Design Society, 1, 791–800. 10.1017/pds.2021.79Google Scholar
Tzortzopoulos, P., Sexton, M. and Cooper, R. (2005) “Process models implementation in the construction industry: a literature synthesis”, Engineering, construction and architectural management,Google Scholar
Wong, Y. Y. B., Joyce, S. C. and Blessing, L. (2021) “A review of design research in engineering productivity in the architecture, engineering and construction (AEC) industry”, Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design, the Design Society, 1, 201–210Google Scholar
Wynn, D. C. and Clarkson, P. J. (2018) “Process models in design and development”, Research in Engineering Design, 29(2), 161–202Google Scholar
Zeiler, W. (1993) “Methodical design framework for design improvement”, in 4th International Congress of Industrial Engineering, Marseille, FranceGoogle Scholar
You have
Access
Open access