Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T17:13:33.882Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Tailoring a Project Risk Management Tool through Co-Design: Managing Risk in the Fuzzy Front-End of Construction Project Design

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 May 2022

A. C. Hansen ,
P. L. Willumsen  and
J. Oehmen
A. C. Hansen*
Affiliation:
Technical University of Denmark, Denmark Bygningsstyrelsen, Denmark
P. L. Willumsen
Affiliation:
Technical University of Denmark, Denmark
J. Oehmen
Affiliation:
Technical University of Denmark, Denmark
*
ancha@dtu.dk

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The objectives and scope of a construction project is defined in the early design stage, the fuzzy front-end. This stage is crucial for project risk management and success, but traditional risk management tend to focus on operational risk in later design stages. This action research study leverages co-design methodology and the project management actuality perspective to tailor a risk management process for the fuzzy front-end of construction projects in a large client organization. The co-design process help enchance stakeholder value perception of the designed solution.

Keywords

co-designrisk managementdesign processactuality perspectiveaction research
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 2: DESIGN2022 , May 2022 , pp. 191 - 200
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2022.

References

Agarwal, R., Chandrasekaran, S. and Sridhar, M. (2016), “Imagining construction's digital future”, Capital Projects and Infrastructure, McKinsey Productivity Sciences Center, Singapore, p. 13.Google Scholar
Ahlemann, F., El Arbi, F., Kaiser, M.G. and Heck, A. (2013), “A process framework for theoretically grounded prescriptive research in the project management field”, International Journal of Project Management, Elsevier Ltd, Vol. 31 No. 1, pp. 43–56. 10.1016/J.IJPROMAN.2012.03.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arieli, D., Friedman, V.J. and Agbaria, K. (2009), “The paradox of participation in action research”, Action Research, Vol. 7 No. 3, pp. 263–290. 10.1177/1476750309336718.Google Scholar
Arnim, J. Von and Oehmen, J. (2014), “IMPLEMENTATION ENTATION ANALYSIS OF LEAN ENABLERS FOR MANAGING MANAGIN G ENGINEERING PROGRAMS 2 . Siemens PM @ IA Program Case Study”, Proceedings of the 13th International Design Conference DESIGN 2014, pp. 1713–1722.Google Scholar
Atkinson, R. (1999), “Project management: Cost, time and quality, two best guesses and a phenomenon, its time to accept other success criteria”, International Journal of Project Management, Elsevier BV, Vol. 17 No. 6, pp. 337–342. 10.1016/S0263-7863(98)00069-6.Google Scholar
Atkinson, R., Crawford, L. and Ward, S. (2006), “Fundamental uncertainties in projects and the scope of project management”, International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 24 No. 8, pp. 687–698. 10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.09.011.Google Scholar
Axelos. (n.d.). “Powering Best Practice | ITIL®, PRINCE2® and MSP® | Axelos”, available at: https://www.axelos.com/ (accessed 15 November 2021).Google Scholar
Banbury, A., Pedell, S., Parkinson, L. and Byrne, L. (2021), “Using the Double Diamond model to co-design a dementia caregivers telehealth peer support program”, Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, Vol. 27 No. 10, pp. 667–673. 10.1177/1357633X211048980.Google ScholarPubMed
Barros Sampaio, S.C. de, , Marinho, M. and Moura, H. (2014), “Systematic Review on Project Actuality”, International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technology, Vol. 6 No. 5, pp. 51–63. 10.5121/ijcsit.2014.6504.Google Scholar
Baskerville, R.L. (1997), “Distinguishing action research from participative case studies”, Journal of Systems and Information Technology, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 24–43. 10.1108/13287269780000733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blomquist, T., Hällgren, M., Nilsson, A. and Söderholm, A. (2010), “Project-as-Practice: In Search of Project Management Research that Matters”, Project Management Journal, Vol. 41 No. 1, pp. 5–16. 10.1002/pmj.20141.Google Scholar
Cagney, A.G. (2015), “Doing action research in your own organization”, Action Learning: Research and Practice, 4 May. 10.1080/14767333.2015.1049453.Google Scholar
Cantarelli, C.C., Flyvbjerg, B., Molin, E.J.E. and van Wee, B. (2010), “Cost overruns in large-scale transportation infrastructure projects: Explanations and their theoretical embeddedness”, European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, Vol. 10 No. 1, pp. 5–18. 10.18757/ejtir.2010.10.1.2864.Google Scholar
Cantarelli, C.C., Molin, E.J.E., Van Wee, B. and Flyvbjerg, B. (2012), “Characteristics of cost overruns for Dutch transport infrastructure projects and the importance of the decision to build and project phases”, Transport Policy, Elsevier, Vol. 22, pp. 49–56. 10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.04.001.Google Scholar
Carminati, L. (2018), “Generalizability in Qualitative Research: A Tale of Two Traditions”, Qualitative Health Research, Vol. 28 No. 13, pp. 2094–2101. 10.1177/1049732318788379.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Carvalho, M.M. and Rabechini Junior, R. (2015), “Impact of risk management on project performance: The importance of soft skills”, International Journal of Production Research, Taylor and Francis Ltd., Vol. 53 No. 2, pp. 321–340. 10.1080/00207543.2014.919423.Google Scholar
Cassell, C. and Johnson, P. (2006), “Action research: Explaining the diversity”, Human Relations, Vol. 59 No. 6, pp. 783–814. 10.1177/0018726706067080.Google Scholar
Chen, Y.Q., Zhang, S.J., Liu, L.S. and Hu, J. (2015), “Risk perception and propensity in bid/no-bid decision-making of construction projects”, Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, Emerald Group Publishing Ltd., Vol. 22 No. 1, pp. 2–20. 10.1108/ECAM-01-2013-0011/FULL/HTML.Google Scholar
Christensen, S. and Kreiner, K. (1991), Projektledelse i Løst Koblede Systemer. Ledelse Og Læring i En Ufuldkommen Verden, 1., Jurist- og Økonomforbundets Forlag.Google Scholar
Cicmil, S., Williams, T., Thomas, J. and Hodgson, D. (2006), “Rethinking Project Management: Researching the actuality of projects”, International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 24 No. 8, pp. 675–686. 10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.08.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coghlan, D. and Shani, A.B. (2014), “Creating Action Research Quality in Organization Development: Rigorous, Reflective and Relevant”, Systemic Practice and Action Research, Vol. 27 No. 6, pp. 523–536. 10.1007/s11213-013-9311-y.Google Scholar
Dearden, A. and Rizvi, H. (2008), “Participatory design and participatory development: a comparative review”, Proceedings of the Tenth Anniversary Conference on Participatory Design 2008, Vol. Indiana Un, pp. 81–91.Google Scholar
Engwall, M. (2003), “No project is an island: Linking projects to history and context”, Research Policy, Elsevier B.V., Vol. 32 No. 5, pp. 789–808. 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00088-4.Google Scholar
EY. (2017), Transport-, Bygnings-Og Boligministeriet Granskning Af Niels Bohr Bygningen.Google Scholar
Flyvbjerg, B., Skamris holm, M.K. and Buhl, S.L. (2003), “How common and how large are cost overruns in transport infrastructure projects?”, Transport Reviews, Vol. 23 No. 1, pp. 71–88. 10.1080/01441640309904.Google Scholar
Järvinen, P. (2007), “Action research is similar to design science”, Quality and Quantity, Vol. 41 No. 1, pp. 37–54. 10.1007/s11135-005-5427-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koskela, L. and Howell, G. (2002), “The underlying theory of project management is obsolete”, The PMI Research Conference, Seattle.Google Scholar
Kutsch, E., Browning, T.R. and Hall, M. (2014), “Bridging the risk gap: The failure of risk management in information systems projects”, Research Technology Management, Industrial Research Institute Inc., Vol. 57 No. 2, pp. 26–32. 10.5437/08956308X5702133.Google Scholar
Maestrini, V., Luzzini, D., Shani, A.B. and Canterino, F. (2016), “The action research cycle reloaded: Conducting action research across buyer-supplier relationships”, Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, Vol. 22 No. 4, pp. 289–298. 10.1016/j.pursup.2016.06.002.Google Scholar
Meyer, C.B. (2001), “A Case in Case Study Methodology”, Field Methods, Vol. 13 No. 4, pp. 329–352. 10.1177/1525822X0101300402.Google Scholar
Nielsen, J.;, Pedersen, E., Steen, , ; and Haugbølle, K. (2010), Aalborg Universitet Byggeriets Produktivitet Udvikling i Boligbyggeriets Standard. Dokumentationsrapport 2.Google Scholar
Olechowski, A., Oehmen, J., Seering, W. and Ben-Daya, M. (2012), “Characteristics of successful risk management in product design”, Proceedings of International Design Conference, DESIGN, Vol. DS 70, pp. 269–278.Google Scholar
Pikas, E., Oehmen, J., Koskela, L. and Thuesen, C. (2018), “A new framework for construction project definition stage”, Proceedings of International Design Conference, DESIGN, Vol. 3, pp. 1301–1312. 10.21278/idc.2018.0542.Google Scholar
Rigsrevisionen. (2017), Region Midtjyllands Styring Af Risici Og Reserver i 2 Sygehusbyggerier, Copenhagen, available at: https://rigsrevisionen.dk/Media/1/5/sr1116.pdf (accessed 15 November 2021).Google Scholar
Rigsrevisionen. (2020), Byggeriet Af Niels Bohr Bygningen, available at: https://rigsrevisionen.dk/Media/4/9/1503-21.pdf.Google Scholar
Sanders, E.B.-N. and Stappers, P.J. (2008), “Co-creation and the new landscapes of design”, CoDesign, Vol. 4 No. 1, pp. 5–18. 10.1080/15710880701875068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Škec, S., Štorga, M., Rohde, D. and Marjanović, D. (2014), “Tailoring risk management approach for the product development environment”, Proceedings of International Design Conference, DESIGN, Vol. 2014-Janua, pp. 385–396.Google Scholar
Smith, N. and Male, S. (2007), “Risk, value, uncertainty and requirements management in projects”, CME 2007 Conference - Construction Management and Economics: “Past, Present and Future”, pp. 385–394.Google Scholar
Svejvig, P. and Andersen, P. (2015), “Rethinking project management: A structured literature review with a critical look at the brave new world”, International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 33 No. 2, pp. 278–290. 10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.06.004.Google Scholar
Tegeltija, M., Oehmen, J., McMahon, C.A., Maier, A., Kozin, I. and Škec, S. (2018), “Tailoring risk management in design”, Proceedings of International Design Conference, DESIGN, Vol. 2, pp. 667–678. 10.21278/idc.2018.0385.Google Scholar
Thomae, H. (1999), “The Nomothetic-Idiographic Issue: Some Roots and Recent Trends”, International Journal of Group Tensions, Vol. 28 No. 1–2, pp. 187–215. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021891506378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
U.S. General Accounting Office. (2008), Defense Acquisitions. Assessments of Selected Weapon Programs, Vol. GAO-11-233, available at: https://www.gao.gov/assets/gao-11-233sp.pdf.Google Scholar
Vink, P., Imada, A.S. and Zink, K.J. (2008), “Defining stakeholder involvement in participatory design processes”, Applied Ergonomics, Vol. 39 No. 4, pp. 519–526. 10.1016/j.apergo.2008.02.009.Google ScholarPubMed
Ward, S. and Chapman, C. (1991), “Extending the use of risk analysis in project management”, International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 9 No. 2, pp. 117–123. 10.1016/0263-7863(91)90071-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, S. and Chapman, C. (2008), “Stakeholders and uncertainty management in projects”, Construction Management and Economics, Vol. 26 No. 6, pp. 563–577. 10.1080/01446190801998708.Google Scholar
Wied, M. (2020), Wrong, but Not Failed? Resilience and Brittleness in Complex Engineering Projects, Technical University of Denmark, available at: www.ntnu.edu/mtp (accessed 15 November 2021).Google Scholar
Willumsen, P., Oehmen, J., Stingl, V. and Geraldi, J. (2019), “Value creation through project risk management”, International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 37 No. 5, pp. 731–749. 10.1016/j.ijproman.2019.01.007.Google Scholar
Winter, M., Smith, C., Morris, P. and Cicmil, S. (2006), “Directions for future research in project management: The main findings of a UK government-funded research network”, International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 24 No. 8, pp. 638–649. 10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.08.009.Google Scholar
Xia, N., Zou, P.X.W., Griffin, M.A., Wang, X. and Zhong, R. (2018), “Towards integrating construction risk management and stakeholder management: A systematic literature review and future research agendas”, International Journal of Project Management, Elsevier Ltd, Vol. 36 No. 5, pp. 701–715. 10.1016/J.IJPROMAN.2018.03.006.Google Scholar