Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pjpqr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-04T01:56:11.840Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

USE OF INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY TOOLS IN DISTRIBUTED PRODUCT DESIGN STUDENT TEAMS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 July 2021

Nikola Horvat ,
Niccolò Becattini  and
Stanko Škec
Nikola Horvat*
Affiliation:
University of Zagreb
Niccolò Becattini
Affiliation:
Politecnico di Milano
Stanko Škec
Affiliation:
University of Zagreb
*
Horvat, Nikola, University of Zagreb, FSB, Department of Design, Croatia, nikola.horvat@fsb.hr

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This paper analyses the use of information and communication technologies (ICTs) in a distributed product design project-based learning (PBL). The paper presents the ICT use of five international student teams during three product design phases: identification of opportunities, conceptual design, embodiment design. General results show that student teams used around 30 different ICTs for both taskwork and teamwork. Students reported that they used previously known ICTs or ICTs properly introduced to them during the initial course workshop. Results also show that team members often work individually on their tasks and use various procedures to share their results. Also, teams conduct some activities synchronously, suggesting the need for teams to have a collaborative workspace. Cloud-based collaborative ICTs (e.g. whiteboard, computer-aided design, document editor, task management) showed huge potential for individual and team tasks. Hence, educators and teams should carefully consider which ICTs to implement and learn, as it might greatly impact the execution of the product design PBL course.

Keywords

Design educationProject-based learningCollaborative designDistributed teamsTechnology
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 1: ICED21 , August 2021 , pp. 3329 - 3338
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

Becattini, N., Cascini, G. and Rotini, F. (2015), “OTSM-TRIZ Network of Problems for evaluating the design skills of engineering students”, Procedia Engineering, available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.12.356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becattini, N., Škec, S., Pavković, N. and Cascini, G. (2020), “E-Learning Infrastructure Prototype for Geographically Distributed Project-Based Learning”, Proceedings of the Design Society: DESIGN Conference, available at:https://doi.org/10.1017/dsd.2020.282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brisco, R., Whitfield, R.I. and Grierson, H. (2016), “Recommendations for the use of social network sites and mobile devices in a collaborative engineering design project”, Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education: Design Education: Collaboration and Cross-Disciplinarity, E and PDE 2016.Google Scholar
Brisco, R., Whitfield, R.I. and Grierson, H. (2020), “A novel systematic method to evaluate computer-supported collaborative design technologies”, Research in Engineering Design, available at:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-019-00323-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brisco, R., Whitfield, R.I., Grierson, H. and Bohemia, E. (2019), “Overcoming the challenges of global collaboration through design education”, DS 95: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education (E&PDE 2019), University of Strathclyde, Glasgow. 12th -13th September 2019, The Design Society, available at:https://doi.org/10.35199/epde2019.73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cash, P., Škec, S. and Štorga, M. (2019), “The dynamics of design: exploring heterogeneity in meso-scale team processes”, Design Studies, available at:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2019.08.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dym, C.L., Agogino, A.M., Eris, O., Frey, D.D. and Leifer, L.J. (2005), “Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning”, Journal of Engineering Education, available at:https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00832.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hmelo-Silver, C.E. (2004), “Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn?”, Educational Psychology Review, available at: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDPR.0000034022.16470.f3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kawakami, T., Barczak, G. and Durmuşoğlu, S.S. (2015), “Information Technology Tools in New Product Development: The Impact of Complementary Resources*,†”, Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 32 No. 4, pp. 622–635.10.1111/jpim.12244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leung, W., Wang, Y. and Kim, S.W. (2019), “Global product development: Project-based multidisciplinary joint course”, Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education: Towards a New Innovation Landscape, E and PDE 2019, available at: https://doi.org/10.35199/epde2019.55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pahl, G., Beitz, W., Feldhusen, J. and Grote, K.H. (2007), Engineering Design; A Systematic Approach, Third Edit., Springer-Verlag London Limited, London.Google Scholar
Robson, C. and McCartan, K. (2016), Real World Research, Wiley.Google Scholar
Stone, W.L., Pierce, R.S. and Kaul, S. (2018), “Promoting innovation in a junior-level, multidisciplinary, electro-mechanical design course”, ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, available at:https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--30907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verstegen, D.M.L., de Jong, N., van Berlo, J., Camp, A., Könings, K.D., van Merriënboer, J.J.G. and Donkers, J. (2016), “How e-Learning Can Support PBL Groups: A Literature Review”, available at:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08275-2_2.Google Scholar
Vukašinović, N. and Pavković, N. (2017), “Use of virtual mobility to facilitate modern project-based NPD education”, International Journal of Engineering Education.Google Scholar
Xiao, A., Zhang, A.S. and Tam, J. (2018), “Product development process and student learning in an engineering technology capstone project: Electrical Go-Kart”, ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, available at:https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--30894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar