Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g5fl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-25T14:45:00.078Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On Brown–McCoy radical classes in categories

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2009

S. Veldsman
S. Veldsman
Affiliation:
Department of MathematicsRand Afrikaans UniversityP.O. Box 524Johannesburg 2000South Africa
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

What does a simple ring with unity, a topological T0-space and a graph that has at most one loop but may possess edges, have in common? In this note we show that they all are Brown–McCoy semisimple. Suliński has generalised the well-known Brown–McCoy radical class of associative rings (cf. [1]) to a category which satisfies certain conditions. In [3] he defines a simple object, a modular class of objects and the Brown–McCoy radical class as the upper radical class determined by a modular class in a category which, among others, has a zero object and kernels. To include categories like that of topological spaces and graphs, we use the concepts of a trivial object and a fibre. We then follow Suliński and define a simple object, a modular class of objects and then the Brown–McCoy radical class as the upper radical class determined by a modular class.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Edinburgh Mathematical Society , Volume 26 , Issue 3 , October 1983 , pp. 337 - 341
Copyright
Copyright © Edinburgh Mathematical Society 1983

References

REFERENCES

1.Divinsky, N. J., Rings and Radicals (George Allen and Unwin Ltd., London, 1975).Google Scholar
2.Rashid, M. A. and Wiegandt, R., The hereditariness of the upper radical, Acta Math. Sci. Hung. 24 (1973), 343–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Suliński, A., The Brown-McCoy radical in categories, Fund. Math. 59 (1966), 23–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Tiller, J. A., Component subcategories, Quaestiones Mathematicae 4 (1980), 19–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Veldsman, S., On the characterization of radical and semisimple classes in categories, Comm. in Algebra 10 (1982), 913–938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Wiegandt, R., A condition in general radical theory and its meaning for rings, topological spaces and graphs, Acta Math. Acad. Sci. Hung. 26 (1975), 233–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar