Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T22:10:12.876Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The cultures of archaeoastronomy and the history of science†

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2011

Stephen C. McCluskey
Stephen C. McCluskey*
Affiliation:
Department of History, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA email: stephen.mccluskey@mail.wvu.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This essay draws on the skeptical opinions that some historians of science have of archaeoastronomy, on historians' changing interpretations of proper historical method, and on their varied understandings of the nature of science to discuss how these methodological issues apply to archaeoastronomy. The essay argues that archaeoastronomical research should bear as much attention to the external context of early astronomies as it does to their internal content, suggesting specifically that insights into the origins of science can be gained by paying greater attention to the practitioners of early astronomies—to the skywatchers.

Keywords

historiographymethodologyhistory of scienceskywatchersethnohistory
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 7 , Symposium S278: “Oxford IX” International Symposium on Archaeoastronomy , January 2011 , pp. 19 - 29
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2011

References

Aldana, G. 2006, Lunar alliances: shedding light on conflicting Classic Maya theories of hegemony. In Bostwick, T. W. & Bates, B. (eds), Viewing the Sky Through Past and Present Cultures, Anthropological Papers 15, Pueblo Grande Museum, Phoenix, pp. 237–258.Google Scholar
Aldana, G. 2007, The Apotheosis of Janaab' Pakal: Science, History, and Religion at Classic Maya Palenque, University Press of Colorado, Boulder.Google Scholar
Aveni, A. F. 1980, Skywatchers of Ancient Mexico, University of Texas Press, Austin.Google Scholar
Aveni, A. F. 1981a, Archaeoastronomy. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory 4, 1–77.Google Scholar
Aveni, A. F. 1981b, Archaeoastronomy in the Maya region: a review of the past decade. Archaeo-astronomy no. 3 (supplement to Journal for the History of Astronomy 12), S1–S16.Google Scholar
Aveni, A. F. 2001, Skywatchers, University of Texas Press, Austin.Google Scholar
Aveni, A. F. 2003, Archaeoastronomy in the ancient Americas. Journal of Archaeological Research 11, 149–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berggren, J. L. 1996, Islamic acquisition of the foreign sciences: a cultural perspective. In Ragep, F. J., Ragep, S. P. & Livesey, S. (eds), Tradition, Transmission, Transformation: Proceedings of Two Conferences on Pre-modern Science held at the University of Oklahoma, E. J. Brill, Leiden, pp. 263–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clagett, M. 1955, Greek Science in Antiquity, Abelard-Schuman, New York.Google Scholar
Cohen, H. F. 1994, The Scientific Revolution: a Historiographical Inquiry, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Dampier-Wetham, W. C. 1911, Science. In Encyclopædia Britannica (11th edn), Encyclopedia Brittanica, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
Gingerich, O. 1989, Reflections on the role of archaeoastronomy in the history of astronomy. In Aveni, A. F. (ed.), World Archaeoastronomy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 38–44.Google Scholar
King, D. A. 1993, Folk astronomy in the service of religion: the case of Islam. In Ruggles, C. L. N. & Saunders, N. J. (eds), Astronomies and Cultures, University Press of Colorado, Niwot, pp. 124–138.Google Scholar
King, D. A. 1996, On the role of the muezzin and muwaqqit in medieval Islamic society. In Ragep, F. J., Ragep, S. P. & Livesey, S. (eds), Tradition, Transmission, Transformation: Proceedings of Two Conferences on Pre-modern Science held at the University of Oklahoma, E. J. Brill, Leiden, pp. 285–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kragh, H. 1987, An Introduction to the Historiography of Science, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landa, Diego de 1941 [1566], Landa's Relación de las Cosas de Yucatan, a Translation, transl. & ed. Tozzer, A. M., Papers of the Peabody Museum of American Archaeology and Ethnology 18, Peabody Museum, Cambridge MA.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. & Sivin, N. 2002, The Way and the Word: Science and Medicine in Early China and Greece, Yale University Press, New Haven.Google Scholar
McCluskey, S. C. 1993, Astronomies and rituals at the dawn of the Middle Ages. In Ruggles, C. L. N. & Saunders, N. J. (eds), Astronomies and Cultures, University Press of Colorado, Niwot, pp. 100–123.Google Scholar
McCluskey, S. C. 2000, The inconstant moon: lunar astronomies in different cultures. Archaeoastronomy: the Journal of Astronomy in Culture 15, 14–31.Google Scholar
McCluskey, S. C. 2005, Different astronomies, different cultures, and the question of cultural relativism. In Fountain, J. W. & Sinclair, R. M. (eds), Current Studies in Archaeoastronomy: Conversations Across Time and Space, Carolina Academic Press, Durham, NC, pp. 69–79.Google Scholar
McKenney, T. L. & Hall, J. 1936 [1836–44], History of the Indian Tribes of North America, with Biographical Sketches and Anecdotes of the Principal Chiefs (3 vols), John Grant, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Marshack, A. 1985, A lunar-solar year calendar stick from North America. American Antiquity 50, 27–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshack, A. 1989, North American Indian calendar sticks: the evidence for a widely distributed tradition. In Aveni, A. F. (ed.), World Archaeoastronomy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 308–324.Google Scholar
Moerman, D. 2003, Native American Ethnobotany: A database of plants used as drugs, foods, dyes, fibers, and more, by native peoples of North America. http://herb.umd.umich.edu/.Google Scholar
Murray, W. B. 1989, A re-examination of the Winnebago calendar stick. In Aveni, A. F. (ed.), World Archaeoastronomy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 325–330.Google Scholar
Pedersen, O. 1982, The present position of archaeo-astronomy. In Heggie, D. C. (ed.), Archaeo-astronomy in the Old World, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 265–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pingree, D. 1992, Hellenophilia versus the history of science. Isis 83, 554–563.Google Scholar
Ruggles, C. L. N. 1982, A reassessment of the high precision megalithic lunar sightlines, 1: backsights, indicators, and the archaeological status of the sightlines. Archaeoastronomy no. 4 (supplement to Journal for the History of Astronomy 13), S21–S40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruggles, C. L. N. 1983, A reassessment of the high precision megalithic lunar sightlines, 2: foresights and the problem of selection. Archaeoastronomy no. 5 (supplement to Journal for the History of Astronomy 14), S1–S36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruggles, C. L. N. 1999, Astronomy in Prehistoric Britain and Ireland, Yale University Press, New Haven.Google Scholar
Sabra, A. I. 1996, The appropriation and subsequent naturalization of Greek science in Medieval Islam: a preliminary statement. In Ragep, F. J., Ragep, S. P. & Livesey, S. (eds), Tradition, Transmission, Transformation: Proceedings of Two Conferences on Pre-modern Science held at the University of Oklahoma, E. J. Brill, Leiden, pp. 3–27.Google Scholar
Sarton, G. 1927, An Introduction to the History of Science, Carnegie Institute of Washington Publication 376 (3 vols. in 5), Carnegie Institute, Washington DC.Google Scholar
Sarton, G. 1936, The Study of the History of Science, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Tedlock, B. 1992, Time and the Highland Maya (revised edn.), University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.Google Scholar