Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T03:41:31.844Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dynamical Evolution of the Mass Function of the Galactic Globular Cluster System

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2007

Jihye Shin ,
Sungsoo S. Kim  and
Koji Takahashi
Jihye Shin
Affiliation:
Dept. of Astronomy and Space Science, Kyung Hee University, Korea email: jhshin@ap1.khu.ac.kr
Sungsoo S. Kim
Affiliation:
Dept. of Astronomy and Space Science, Kyung Hee University, Korea email: jhshin@ap1.khu.ac.kr
Koji Takahashi
Affiliation:
Dept. of Informational Society Studies, Saitama Institude of Technology, Japan
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Using the most advanced anisotropic (2D) Fokker-Planck (FP) models, we calculate the evolution of the mass functions of the Galactic globular cluster system (GCMF). Our models include two-body relaxation, binary heating, tidal shocks, dynamical friction, stellar evolution, and realistic cluster orbits. We perform 2D-FP simulations for a large number of virtual globular clusters and synthesize these results to study the relation between the initial and present GCMFs. We found two probable IGCMFs that eventually evolve into the Milky Way GCMF : truncated power-law, and log-normal model with higher initial low mass limit and peak mass than the earlier studies.

Keywords

Globular ClustersFokker-Planck method
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 3 , Symposium S246: Dynamical Evolution of Dense Stellar Systems , September 2007 , pp. 433 - 434
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2008

References

Baumgardt, H. 1998, A&A, 330, 480Google Scholar
Baumgardt, H. & Makino, J. 2003, MNRAS, 340, 227Google Scholar
Fall, S. & Zhang, Q. 2001, ApJ, 561, 751CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gnedin, O. Y., Hernquist, L., & Ostriker, J. P. 1999, ApJ, 514, 109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gnedin, O. Y., Lee, H. M., & Ostriker, J. P. 1999, ApJ, 522, 935CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murali, C. & Weinberg, M. D. 1997a, MNRAS, 288, 749Google Scholar
Murali, C. & Weinberg, M. D. 1997b, MNRAS, 288, 767CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murali, C. & Weinberg, M. D. 1997c, MNRAS, 291, 717CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okazaki, T. & Tosa, M. 1995, MNRAS, 274, 48Google Scholar
Ostriker, J. P. & Gnedin, O. Y. 1997, ApJ, 474, 223Google Scholar
Parmentier, G. & Gilmore, G. 2007, MNRAS, 377, 352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takahashi, K. & Lee, H. M. 2000 MNRAS, 316, 671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vesperini, E. 1997 MNRAS, 287, 915Google Scholar
Vesperini, E. & Heggie, D. C. 1997 MNRAS, 289, 898Google Scholar
Vesperini, E 1998 MNRAS, 299, 1019Google Scholar