Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T11:03:29.419Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Formation and Dynamics of the SMC Cluster NGC 346

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2007

Linda J. Smith*
Affiliation:
Space Telescope Science Institute and European Space Agency, 3700 San Martin Drive, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA Department of Physics and Astronomy, University College London, Gower St., London WC1E 6BT, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The young resolved cluster NGC 346 in the SMC provides us with the opportunity to study the details of cluster formation and the efficiency of feedback mechanisms at low metallicity. I describe the latest results from a large-scale study of this cluster and its H II region N66. HST/ACS images reveal that NGC 346 is composed of a number of sub-clusters which appear to be coeval with ages of 3±1 Myr, strongly suggesting formation by the hierarchical fragmentation of a giant molecular cloud (Nota et al. 2006; Sabbi et al. 2007a). HST Hα images show that the central cluster and the sub-clusters still contain some of their residual gas. We present high resolution spectroscopy of the ionized gas, and find that it shows little evidence for gas motions. This suggests that, at the low SMC metallicity, the cluster O star winds are not powerful enough to sweep away the residual gas. Instead, we find that stellar radiation is the dominant process shaping the interstellar environment of NGC 346.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2008

References

Bate, M. R., Bonnell, I. A., & Bromm, V. 2003, MNRAS 339, 577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bastian, N. & Goodwin, S. P. 2006, MNRAS 369, L6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonnell, I. A. & Bate, M. R. 2002, MNRAS 336, 659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonnell, I. A., Bate, M. R., & Vine, S. 2003, MNRAS 343, 413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouret, J.-C., Lanz, T., Hillier, D. J., Heap, S. R., Hubeny, I., Lennon, D. J., Smith, L. J., & Evans, C. J. 2003, ApJ 595, 1182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Contursi, A. et al. 2000, A&A, 362, 310Google Scholar
Elmegreen, B. G. 2000, AJ 530, 227Google Scholar
Hilditch, R. W., Howarth, I. D., & Harries, T. J. 2005, MNRAS 357, 304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klessen, R. S. & Burkert, A. 2000, ApJS 128, 287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Massey, P., Parker, J. W., & Garmany, C. D. 1989, AJ 98, 1305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nazé, Y., Hartwell, J. M., Stevens, I. R., Corcoran, M. F., Chu, Y.-H., Koenigsberger, G., Moffat, A. F. J., & Niemela, V.S. 2002, ApJ 580, 225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nota, A. et al. 2006, ApJ 640, L29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reid, W. A., Payne, J. L., Filipović, M. D., Danforth, C. W., Jones, P. A., White, G. L., & Staveley-Smith, L. 2006, MNRAS 367, 1379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubio, M., Contursi, A., Lequeux, J., Probst, R., Barbá, R., Boulanger, F., Cesarsky, D., & Maoli, R. 2000, A&A 359, 1139Google Scholar
Sabbi, E. et al. 2007a, AJ 133, 44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabbi, E. et al. 2007b, AJ in pressGoogle Scholar
Simon, J. D. et al. 2007, ApJ 669, 327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ye, T., Turtle, A. J., & Kennicutt, R. C. 1991, MNRAS 249, 722CrossRefGoogle Scholar