Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T11:39:17.670Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Inverse problems of NEO photometry: Imaging the NEO population

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2006

Mikko Kaasalainen1  and
Josef Ďurech
Mikko Kaasalainen1
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics and Statistics, P.O.Box 68, FI-00014 University of Helsinki, Finland email: mikko.kaasalainen@helsinki.fi
Josef Ďurech
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics and Statistics, P.O.Box 68, FI-00014 University of Helsinki, Finland email: mikko.kaasalainen@helsinki.fi Astronomical Institute, Charles University in Prague, V HoleŠovičkách 2, 18000, Prague, Czech Republic email: durech@sirrah.troja.mff.cuni.cz
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The physical properties of NEOs and other asteroids are mostly obtained with photometry. The resulting models describe the shapes, spin states, scattering properties and surface structure of the targets, and are the solutions of inverse problems involving comprehensive mathematical analysis. We review what can and cannot be obtained from photometric (and complementary) data, and how all this is done in practice. The role of photometry will become completely dominating with the advent of large-scale surveys capable of producing calibrated brightness data. Due to their quickly changing geometries with respect to the Earth, NEOs are the population that can be mapped the fastest.

Keywords

data analysisphotometryinfraredscatteringasteroidsurfaces
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 2 , Symposium S236: Near Earth Objects, our Celestial Neighbors: Opportunity and Risk , August 2006 , pp. 151 - 166
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2007

References

Bottke, W.F., Vokrouhlický, D., Rubincam, D.P. & Nesvorný, D. 2006, Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 34, 157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demura, H. & 19 colleagues 2006, Science 312, 1347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ďurech, J. & Kaasalainen, M. 2003, A&A 404, 709Google Scholar
Ďurech, J., Grav, T., Jedicke, R., Kaasalainen, M. & Denneau, L. 2006, Earth, Moon & Planets, in pressGoogle Scholar
Ďurech, J., Scheirich, P., Kaasalainen, M., Grav, T., Jedicke, R., & Denneau, L. 2007, this volumeGoogle Scholar
Helfenstein, P. & Veverka, J. 1989, in: Binzel, R.P. (eds.), Asteroids II (Tucson: University of Arizona Press), 557Google Scholar
Hudson, R. & 26 colleagues 2000, Icarus 148, 37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaasalainen, M., Torppa, J. & Muinonen, K. 2001, Icarus 153, 37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaasalainen, M. 2001, A&A 376, 302Google Scholar
Kaasalainen, M., Mottola, S. & Fulchignoni, M. 2003, in: Bottke, W.F., Cellino, A., Paolicchi, P. & Binzel, R.P. (eds.), Asteroids III (Tucson: University of Arizona Press), p. 139Google Scholar
Kaasalainen, M. & 21 colleagues 2004, Icarus 167, 178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaasalainen, M. 2004, A&A 422, L39Google Scholar
Kaasalainen, M. & Lamberg, L. 2006, Inverse Problems 22, 749CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaasalainen, M. & 20 colleagues 2006, Proceedings of the 1st Hayabusa Symposium, in pressGoogle Scholar
Kaasalainen, S., Kaasalainen, M. & Piironen, J. 2005, A&A 440, 1177Google Scholar
Kaipio, J. & Somersalo, E. 2005, Statistical and computational inverse problems, Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Konopliv, A., Miller, J., Owen, W., Yeomans, D., Giorgini, J., Garnier, R. & Barriot, J. 2002, Icarus 160, 289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lagerkvist, C.-I., Piironen, J. & Erikson, A. 2001, Asteroid Photometric Catalogue, 5th update. Uppsala Univ. Press, Uppsala.Google Scholar
Lamberg, L. & Kaasalainen, M. 2001, J. Comp. Appl. Math 137, 213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, J., 'Hearn, M. & McFadden, L. 2004, Icarus 172, 415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marchis, F., Kaasalainen, M., Hom, E., Berthier, J., Enriquez, J., Hestroffer, D., Le Mignant, D. & de Pater, I. 2006, Icarus 185, 39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mueller, T., Sekiguchi, T., Kaasalainen, M., Abe, M. & Hasegawa, S. 2005, A&A 443, 347Google Scholar
Mueller, T., Sekiguchi, T., Kaasalainen, M., Abe, M. & Hasegawa, S. 2007, this volumeGoogle Scholar
Nathues, A., Mottola, S., Kaasalainen, M. & Neukum, G. 2005, Icarus 175, 452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostro, S.J. & Connelly, D. 1984, Icarus 57, 443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostro, S.J. & 12 colleagues 2005, Meteor. Planet. Sci. 40, 1563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pravec, P., Harris, A., Scheirich, P. et al. . 2005, Icarus 173, 108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pravec, P., Harris, A. & Warner, B. 2007, this volumeGoogle Scholar
Press, W., Flannery, B., Teukolsky, S. & Vetterling, W. 1990, Numerical Recipes, Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Simonelli, D., Veverka, P., Thomas, P. & Helfenstein, P. 1995, Icarus 114, 387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonelli, D., Veverka, P., Thomas, P., Helfenstein, P. & Carcich, B. 1996, Icarus 120, 38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Storrs, A., Vilas, F., Landis, R., Wells, E., Woods, C., Zellner, B. & Gaffey, M. 1999, Icarus 137, 260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, P., Veverka, J., Simonelli, D., Helfenstein, P., Carcich, B., Belton, M., Davies, M. & Chapman, C. 1994, Icarus 107, 23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, P., Belton, M., Carcich, B, Chapman, C., Davies, M., Sullivan, R. & Veverka, J. 1996, Icarus 120, 20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vokrouhlický, D., Čapek, D., Kaasalainen, M. & Ostro, S.J. 2004, A&A 414, L21Google Scholar