Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T17:00:14.409Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Maser Theory: Old Problems and New Insights

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 July 2018

M. D. Gray
M. D. Gray*
Affiliation:
Jodrell Bank Centre for Astrophysics, School of Physics and Astronomy, Alan Turing Building, University of Manchester, M13 9PL, Manchester, UK email: Malcolm.Gray@manchester.ac.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Maser theory continues to be driven by advances in observational techniques. Here, I consider the responses to VLBI with space-Earth baselines and cross-correlation spectroscopy (a re-consideration of coherence properties), routine observation in full-Stokes polarization (a re-casting of the polarization transfer equations), and long-term variability monitoring (3-D modelling of irregular domains).

Keywords

masersmolecular processesradiative transferISM: moleculesradio lines: general
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 13 , Symposium S336: Astrophysical Masers: Unlocking the Mysteries of the Universe , September 2017 , pp. 7 - 12
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2018 

References

Alcock, C. & Ross, R. R. 1985 ApJ, 290, 433Google Scholar
Elitzur, M. 1992, Astronomical Masers (Dordrecht: Kluwer)Google Scholar
Elitzur, M. & Asensio Ramos, A. 2006 MNRAS, 365, 779Google Scholar
Goedhart, S., Gaylard, M. J. & van der Walt, D. J. 2004 MNRAS, 355, 553Google Scholar
Gray, M. D. 2012, Maser Sources in Astrophysics (New York: CUP)Google Scholar
Green, J. A., Gray, M. D., Robishaw, T., Caswell, J. A. & McClure-Griffiths, N. M. 2014 MNRAS, 440, 2988Google Scholar
Kobayashi, H., Shimoikura, T., Omodaka, T., & Diamond, P. J. 2000, in: Hirabayashi, H., Edwards, P. G. & Murphy, D. W. (eds.), Astrophysical Phenomena Revealed by Space VLBI (Institute of Space and Astronautical Science), p. 109–112Google Scholar
King, J. I. F. & Florance, E. T. 1964 ApJ, 139, 397Google Scholar
Landi Degl'Innocenti, E. 1988, in: Kalkofen, W. (ed.), Numerical Radiative Transfer (Cambridge, CUP), p. 265Google Scholar
Menegozzi, L. N. & Lamb, W. E. Jr. 1978 Phys. Rev. A, 17, 701Google Scholar
Slysh, V. I. 2003, in: Zensus, J. A., Cohen, M. H. & Ros, E. (eds.), Radio Astronomy at the Fringe (ASP Conference Series, Vol. 300), p. 239Google Scholar
Strelnitskii, V. S. 1982 Soviet Astron. Lett., 8, 86Google Scholar
Takefuji, K., Imai, H. & Sekido, M. 2016 PASJ, 68, 86Google Scholar
Zienkiewicz, O. & Taylor, R. 2000, The Finite Element Method: The basis (Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann)Google Scholar