Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T05:59:03.239Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the host galaxy properties of stellar binary black hole mergers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2019

Youjun Lu Open the ORCID record for Youjun Lu [Opens in a new window] ,
Liang Cao  and
Yuetong Zhao
Youjun Lu
Affiliation:
National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 20A Datun Road, Beijing 100012, China; luyj@nao.cas.cn School of Astronomy and Space Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 19A Yuquan Road, Beijing 100049, China
Liang Cao
Affiliation:
National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 20A Datun Road, Beijing 100012, China; School of Astronomy and Space Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 19A Yuquan Road, Beijing 100049, China
Yuetong Zhao
Affiliation:
National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 20A Datun Road, Beijing 100012, China; School of Astronomy and Space Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 19A Yuquan Road, Beijing 100049, China
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We report our investigations on the host galaxy properties of stellar binary black holes (SBBHs) by implementing simple recipes for SBBH formation and merger into cosmological galaxy formation model. If the time delay between SBBH formation and merger ranges from Gyr to the Hubble time, SBBH mergers at redshift z < 0.3 occur preferentially in big galaxies with stellar mass M* > 2 × 1010M⊙ and metallicities Z peaking around ~0.6Z⊙. However, the host galaxy stellar mass distribution of heavy SBBH mergers (with total black hole mass >50M⊙) is bimodal with one peak at ~109M⊙ and the other peak at ~2 × 1010M⊙. The contribution fraction from metal-poor host galaxies (Z < 0.2Z⊙) to heavy mergers is much larger than that to less heavy mergers. If SBBHs were formed in the early universe, their mergers detected at z < 0.3 occur preferentially in even more massive galaxies with M* > 3 × 1010M⊙ and in galaxies with metallicities mostly >0.2Z⊙ and peaking at Z ~ 0.6Z⊙.

Keywords

stars: black holesgravitational wavesblack hole physics
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 13 , Symposium S338: Gravitational Wave Astrophysics: Early Results from Gravitational Wave Searches and Electromagnetic Counterparts , October 2017 , pp. 14 - 21
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2019 

References

Abbott, B. P., Abbott, R., Abbott, T. D., et al. 2016, Physical Review Letters, 116, 061102Google Scholar
Abbott, B. P., Abbott, R., Abbott, T. D., et al. 2016, Physical Review Letters, 116, 241103Google Scholar
Abbott, B. P., Abbott, R., Abbott, T. D., et al. 2016, Living Reviews in Relativity, 19, 1Google Scholar
Abbott, B. P., Abbott, R., Abbott, T. D., et al. 2016, APJL, 826, L13Google Scholar
Abbott, B. P., Abbott, R., Abbott, T. D., et al. 2016, Physical Review Letters, 116, 131102Google Scholar
Abbott, B. P., Abbott, R., Abbott, T. D., et al. 2017, Physical Review Letters, 118, 221101Google Scholar
The LIGO Scientific Collaboration, the Virgo Collaboration, Abbott, B. P., et al. 2017, arXiv:1711.05578Google Scholar
Abbott, R., et al. 2017, arXiv:1709.09660Google Scholar
Belczynski, K., Repetto, S., Holz, D. E., et al. 2016a, APJ, 819, 108Google Scholar
Belczynski, K., Holz, D. E., Bulik, T., & O’Shaughnessy, R., 2016b, Nature, 534, 512Google Scholar
Cao, L., Lu, Y., & Zhao, Y. 2017, arXiv:1711.09190Google Scholar
Chabrier, G., 2003, PASP, 115, 763Google Scholar
Dominik, M., Belczynski, K., Fryer, C., et al. 2013, APJ, 779, 72Google Scholar
Dvorkin, I., Vangioni, E., Silk, J., Uzan, J.-P., & Olive, K. A., 2016, MNRAS, 461, 3877Google Scholar
Elbert, O. D., Bullock, J. S., & Kaplinghat, M. 2017, arXiv:1703.02551Google Scholar
Farr, W. M., Sravan, N., Cantrell, A., et al. 2011, APJ, 741, 103Google Scholar
Guo, Q., White, S., Boylan-Kolchin, M., et al. 2011, MNRAS, 413, 101Google Scholar
Lamberts, A., Garrison-Kimmel, S., Clausen, D. R., & Hopkins, P. F., 2016, MNRAS, 463, L31Google Scholar
Madau, P. & Dickinson, M., 2014, ARAA, 52, 415MGoogle Scholar
Mandel, I. & de Mink, S. E., 2016, MNRAS, 458, 2634Google Scholar
Mapelli, M., Giacobbo, N., Ripamonti, E., & Spera, M. 2017, arXiv:1708.05722Google Scholar
O’Shaughnessy, R., Bellovary, J. M., Brooks, A., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 464, 2831Google Scholar
Özel, F., Psaltis, D., Narayan, R., & McClintock, J. E., 2010, APJ, 725, 1918Google Scholar
Schneider, R., Graziani, L., Marassi, S., et al. 2017, arXiv:1705.06781Google Scholar
Spera, M., Mapelli, M., & Bressan, A., 2015, MNRAS, 451, 4086Google Scholar