Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T08:57:04.377Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sunspot group tilt angles from drawings for cycles 19-24

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 November 2018

Emre Işık
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institut für Sonnensystemforschung, Justus-von-Liebig-Weg 3, 37077, Göttingen, Germany email: isik@mps.mpg.de Feza Gürsey Center for Physics and Mathematics, Boğaziçi University, Kuleli 34684 Istanbul, Turkey
Seda Işık
Affiliation:
Kandilli Observatory and Earthquake Research Institute, Boğaziçi University, Kuleli 34684 Istanbul, Turkey
Bahar B. Kabasakal
Affiliation:
Feza Gürsey Center for Physics and Mathematics, Boğaziçi University, Kuleli 34684 Istanbul, Turkey
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The tilt angle of a sunspot group is a critical quantity in the surface transport of magnetic flux and the solar dynamo. To contribute long-term databases of the tilt angle, we developed an IDL routine, which allows the user to interactively select and measure sunspot positions and areas on the solar disc. We measured the tilt angles of sunspot groups for solar cycles 19-24 (1954.6-2017.8), using the sunspot drawing database of Kandilli Observatory. The method is similar to that used in the discontinued Mt. Wilson and Kodaikanal databases, with the exception that sunspot groups were identified manually, which has improved the accuracy of the resulting tilt angles. We obtained cycle averages of the tilt angle and compared them with the values from other datasets, keeping the same group selection criteria. We conclude that the previously reported anti-correlation with the cycle strength needs further investigation.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2018 

References

Baranyi, T., 2015, MNRAS, 447, 1857Google Scholar
Baranyi, T., Győri, L., & Ludmány, A., 2016, Solar Phys., 291, 3081Google Scholar
Baumann, I. & Solanki, S. K., 2005, A&A, 443, 1061Google Scholar
Dasi-Espuig, M., Solanki, S. K., Krivova, N. A., Cameron, R., & Peñuela, T., 2010, A&A, 518, A7Google Scholar
Dasi-Espuig, M., Solanki, S. K., Krivova, N. A., Cameron, R., & Peñuela, T., 2013, A&A, 556, C3Google Scholar
Howard, R. F., 1991, Solar Phys., 136, 251Google Scholar
Işık, E., 2015, ApJ (Letters), 813, L13Google Scholar
Jiang, J., Işık, E., Cameron, R. H., Schmitt, D., & Schüssler, M., 2010, ApJ, 717, 597Google Scholar
Senthamizh Pavai, V., Arlt, R., Dasi-Espuig, M., Krivova, N. A., & Solanki, S. K., 2015, A&A, 584, A73Google Scholar
Tlatov, A., Illarionov, E., Sokoloff, D., & Pipin, V., 2013, MNRAS, 432, 2975Google Scholar