Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T14:17:33.009Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Unexpected kinematics of multiple populations in globular clusters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2020

Emanuele Dalessandro*
Affiliation:
INAF - Astrophysics and Space Science Observatory Bologna, Via Gobetti 93/3 40129 Bologna - Italy
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Present-day structural and kinematical properties of multiple populations (MPs) can provide useful information about the physical mechanisms driving the formation and early evolution of globular clusters (GCs). As part of a large project aimed at characterizing the kinematics of MPs, here we present a detailed multi-epoch analysis of the low-mass GC NGC6362. We find that MPs in this system show significant differences in their line-of-sight velocity dispersion profiles. This result is totally unexpected given the dynamical age and fraction of mass lost by NGC6362. We also find that the binary fraction is remarkably larger in the first (FP) than in the second population (SP). We show that such a difference can efficiently inflate the velocity dispersion of FP at intermediate/large cluster-centric distances with respect to SP. Indeed, our results nicely match the predictions of state-of-the art N-body simulations of the co-evolution of MPs in GCs including the effect of binaries.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
© International Astronomical Union 2020

References

Bastian, N. & Lardo, C. 2018, ARA&A, 56, 83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellini, A., Vesperini, E., Piotto, G., et al. 2015, ApJL, 810, L13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cordero, M. J., Hénault-Brunet, V., Pilachowski, C. A., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 465, 3515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalessandro, E.et al. 2014, ApJL, 791, 4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalessandro, E., Mucciarelli, A., Bellazzini, M., et al. 2018, ApJ, 864, 33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalessandro, E., Cadelano, M., Vesperini, E., et al. 2019, ApJl, 884, L24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Decressin, T., Meynet, G., Charbonnel, C., Prantzos, N., & Ekström, S. 2007, A&A, 464, 1029Google Scholar
Denissenkov, P. A. & Hartwick, F. D. A. 2014, MNRAS, 437, 21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D’Ercole, A., Vesperini, E., D’Antona, F., McMillan, S. L. W., & Recchi, S. 2008, MNRAS, 391, 825CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferraro, F. R., Mucciarelli, A., Lanzoni, B., et al. 2018, ApJ, 860, 50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gieles, M., Charbonnel, C., Krause, M. G. H., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 478, 2461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hong, J., Patel, S., Vesperini, E., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 483, 2592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucatello, S., Sollima, A., Gratton, R., et al. 2015, A&A, 584, A52Google Scholar
Miholics, M., Webb, J. J., & Sills, A. 2015, MNRAS, 454, 2166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richer, H. B., Heyl, J., Anderson, J., et al. 2013, ApJL, 771, L15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vesperini, E., McMillan, S. L. W., D’Antona, F., & D’Ercole, A. 2013, MNRAS, 429, 1913CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vesperini, E., Hong, J., Webb, J. J., D’Antona, F., & D’Ercole, A. 2018, MNRAS, 476, 2731CrossRefGoogle Scholar