Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T05:23:04.156Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Almonds and their impact on gastrointestinal physiology, luminal microbiology and gastrointestinal function: a randomised controlled trial

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2022

A.C. Creedon
Affiliation:
Department of Nutritional Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
E. Dimidi
Affiliation:
Department of Nutritional Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
E.S. Hung
Affiliation:
Department of Nutritional Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
S.M. Scott
Affiliation:
Centre for Neuroscience, Surgery and Trauma, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
C. Probert
Affiliation:
Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
S.E. Berry
Affiliation:
Department of Nutritional Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
K. Whelan
Affiliation:
Department of Nutritional Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Abstract
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2022

The gut microbiota and their metabolites are increasingly recognised for their roles in gut health. Almonds are nuts that are rich in fermentable nutrients and have physiochemical properties that result in poor nutrient bioaccessibility in the upper gastrointestinal tract(Reference Ellis, Kendall and Ren1). Subsequently, intracellular nutrients reach the colon where they are available to the microbiota, and processing and mastication may influence this. A systematic review of randomised controlled trials investigating nut consumption and the gut microbiota revealed an effect of nuts on several bacterial genera, but not Bifidobacteria, while the quality of included trials was poor(Reference Creedon, Hung and Berry2). The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of almonds on faecal Bifidobacteria (primary outcome) and gut microbiology, physiology and symptoms.

Eighty-seven healthy adults with low fibre intake were randomised to receive whole almonds (56 g/d), ground almonds (56 g/d) or a control muffin (2/d) in place of their habitual snacks for 4 weeks. Faecal Bifidobacteria, gut microbiota composition and diversity (16S rRNA sequencing), short-chain fatty acids (SCFA; gas-chromatography), volatile organic compounds (gas-chromatography mass- spectrometry), gut transit time (wireless motility capsule), and stool output and symptoms (7-day diary) were measured at baseline and at end of study. Differences between groups were assessed by analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) or a non-parametric equivalent and corrected for multiple testing (Bonferroni (p) or Benjamini-Hochberg FDR (q)) where appropriate.

There were no differences in relative abundance of faecal bifidobacteria following 4-weeks consumption of whole almonds (8.7%, SD 7.7), ground almonds (7.8%, SD 6.9) or control (13.0%, SD 10.2; q = 0.613). There was no effect of almonds on gut microbiota at the phylum level or on diversity. At the genus level, almonds (whole and ground pooled) increased relative abundance of Lachnospiraceae_NK4A136_group, Phascolarctobacterium and decreased Tyzerella (all p < 0.05), however these were no longer significant following adjustment; and resulted in higher concentrations of butyrate (24.1 μmol/g, SD 15.0) in comparison to control (18.2, SD 9.1; p = 0.046). There was no effect of almonds on gut transit time, stool consistency or gut symptoms. There were no differences between the whole almond (low nutrient bioaccessibility) and ground almond (higher nutrient bioaccessibility) groups for any outcome.

Almond consumption does not exert a prebiotic effect on faecal Bifidobacteria in healthy adults, however, may influence gut microbiota at the genus level, and increase butyrate production.

References

Ellis, PR, Kendall, CWC, Ren, Y et al. (2004) Am J Clin Nutr 80, 604613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Creedon, AC, Hung, ES, Berry, SE et al. (2020) Nutrients 12, 2347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar