Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T15:29:21.906Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Eating behaviours, genetic influence and dietary intake of Irish twins

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 November 2016

R. Barron ,
K. Bermingham ,
L. Brennan ,
E. Gibney ,
M. Ryan  and
A. O’ Sullivan
R. Barron
Affiliation:
Institute of Food and Health, University College Dublin, Dublin, Republic of Ireland
K. Bermingham
Affiliation:
Institute of Food and Health, University College Dublin, Dublin, Republic of Ireland
L. Brennan
Affiliation:
Institute of Food and Health, University College Dublin, Dublin, Republic of Ireland
E. Gibney
Affiliation:
Institute of Food and Health, University College Dublin, Dublin, Republic of Ireland
M. Ryan
Affiliation:
Institute of Food and Health, University College Dublin, Dublin, Republic of Ireland
A. O’ Sullivan
Affiliation:
Institute of Food and Health, University College Dublin, Dublin, Republic of Ireland
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Type
Abstract
Information
Proceedings of the Nutrition Society , Volume 75 , Issue OCE3: Summer Meeting, 11–14 July 2016, New technology in nutrition research and practice , 2016 , E174
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2016 

A growing body of evidence suggests that eating behaviours are to some extent influenced by genes(Reference Sung, Lee and Song1). Twin studies are a useful resource that can evaluate the heritability (proportion of the variation due to genetic factors) of a trait. The Dutch Eating Behaviour Questionnaire (DEBQ) is frequently used to measure three domains of eating behaviour; emotional eating (overeating in the presence of negative emotions), external eating (overeating in response to external stimuli) and dietary restraint (the tendency to consciously restrict food)(Reference Van Strien, Frijters and Bergers2). The intuitive eating concept (assessed through the Intuitive Eating Scale (IES)) is based on eating in response to physiological cues(Reference Hawks, Merrill and Madanat3). This study aims to determine the presence of genetic effects on components of eating behaviour.

Data was obtained from monozygotic (MZ) twins (n = 88) and dizygotic (DZ) twins (n = 38). Dietary data were collected using 24hr recalls on 5 separate non consecutive days and assessed using WISP version 3.0 (Tinuviel Software). Eating behaviour was assessed through DEBQ and IES. High, medium and low scorers of eating behaviours were classified based on tertiles. Partial correlations controlling for age and gender were compared between MZ and DZ twins. Ethics was obtained from the UCD Human Research Ethics Committee.

Significant MZ correlations were observed for all eating behaviour components except DEBQ Restrained (Table 1). MZ correlations were significantly higher than DZ correlations for DEBQ Emotional, indicating the presence of genetic effects (Table 1). A significant difference in energy intake (kcal) was also observed between high and low DEBQ Restrained scorers, with low scorers reporting higher energy intakes (Figure 1). These findings suggest that eating behaviours may be influenced by genetic makeup. However more work is required to determine the impact of genetics and/or environment using more advanced modelling techniques(Reference Sung, Lee and Song1).

Fig. 1.

Table 1.

Partial correlations controlling for age and gender

* Significant at p < 0·05

References

1.Sung, J, Lee, K, Song, YM et al. (2010) Obesity (Silver Spring) 18, 1000–510.1038/oby.2009.389Google Scholar
2.Van Strien, T, Frijters, JE, Bergers, G, et al. (1986) Int J Eat Disord 5, 295–31510.1002/1098-108X(198602)5:2<295::AID-EAT2260050209>3.0.CO;2-T3.0.CO;2-T>Google Scholar
3.Hawks, S, Merrill, RM, Madanat, HN. (2004) J Health Educ 35:90–9.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1.

Figure 1

Table 1.