Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T23:02:11.736Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Pleistocene Succession in the Lower parts of the Thames Valley

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 May 2014

W. B. R. King  and
K. P. Oakley
W. B. R. King
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University College, London
K. P. Oakley
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, British Museum, Natural History
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The object of the present communication is to demonstrate the relationships which, in the light of present knowledge, appear to exist between the various Pleistocene and Holocene deposits in the Lower and Middle Thames Valley. For this purpose two cross-sections of the valley have been drawn indicating the relative positions of the deposits which occur at various localities as though they were all present in two localities, one in the Lower, and one in the Middle Thames.

As many of the more important deposits in the Lower Thames are represented to the north and south of the river in the Dartford area, we have drawn the one section as if our ideal locality occurred in that neighbourhood. In this section, therefore, the relative altitudes of the various beds above and below present river level are those which are found in that part of the Thames basin. In tributary valleys, or in other parts of the main valley these altitudes are not of course necessarily maintained. In cases where deposits belonging to a particular stage have not been preserved in the Dartford area, but occur in a neighbouring part of the valley, or in a tributary valley, their position in the composite section has been roughly gauged by a process of extrapolation. Similarly when dealing with the Middle Thames, we have drawn our ideal section as though all the deposits occurred in one section of the valley in the neighbourhood of Iver.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society , Volume 2 , Issue 1-2 , 1936 , pp. 52 - 76
Copyright
Copyright © The Prehistoric Society 1936

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bromehead, C. E. N., 1922, ‘The Geology of the London District’ (Woodward, H. B.), 2nd edit., Mem. Geol. Surv.Google Scholar
Dewey, H. and others, 1924, ‘Geology of the Country around Dartford,’ Mem. Geol. Surv. (Sheet 271).Google Scholar
Dewey, H. and Bromehead, C. E. N., 1915, ‘The Geology of the Country around Windsor and Chertsey,’ Mem. Geol. Surv. (Sheet 269).Google Scholar
Dewey, H. and others, 1921, ‘The Geology of South London,’ Mem. Geol. Surv. (Sheet 270).Google Scholar
Dines, H. G. and Edmunds, F. H., 1925, ‘The Geology of the Country around Romford,’ Mem. Geol. Surv. (Sheet 257).Google Scholar
Dines, H. G. and Edmunds, F. H., 1933, ‘The Geology of the Country around Reigate and Dorking,’ Mem. Geol. Surv. (Sheet 286).Google Scholar
Sherlock, R. L. and Noble, A. H., 1922, ‘The Geology of the Country around Beaconsfield,’ Mem. Geol. Surv. (Sheet 255).Google Scholar
Whitaker, W., 1889, ‘The Geology of London,’ vol. 1, Mem. Geol. Surv.Google Scholar
Jreuil, H., 1929, ‘La Préhistoire,’ Revue des Cours et Conférences (Collège de France), 30, XII.Google Scholar
Jreuil, H., 1931, ‘The Pleistocene Sequence in the Thames Valley,’ S.E. Naturalist and Antiquary, vol. xxxvi, pp. 95–8.Google Scholar
Jreuil, H., 1932, ‘Les industries à éclats du paléolithique ancien, 1.—Le Clactonien,’ Préhistoire, tome 1, pp. 125–190.Google Scholar
Jreuil, H., 1934, ‘De l'importance de la solifluxion dans 1'étude des terrains quarternaires de la France et des pays voisins,’ Revue de Géographie Physique et de Géologie Dynamique, vol. VII, pp. 269–331.Google Scholar
Jreuil, H., and Koslowski, , 1931–1932, ‘Études de stratigraphie paléolithique dans le nord de la France, la Belgique et l'Angleterre,’ L'Anthropologie, tome XLI, pp. 449–488; tome XLII, pp. 27–47, and pp. 291–314.Google Scholar
Brown, J. A., 1896, ‘Notes on the High-level River Drift between Hanwell and Iver,’ Proc. Geol. Assoc, vol. xiv, pp. 153–173.Google Scholar
Burchell, J. P. T., 1931, ‘Early Neanthropic Man and his Relation to the Ice Age,’ Proc. Preh. Soc. E. Anglia, vol. VI, pp. 253–303.Google Scholar
Burchell, J. P. T. 1933, ‘The Northfleet 50-foot Submergence later than the Coombe Rock of post-Early Mousterian times,’ Archaeologia, vol. LXXXIII, pp. 67–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burchell, J. P. T., 1934, ‘The Middle Mousterian Culture and its relation to the Coombe Rock of Post-Early Mousterian Times,’ Antiquaries Journal, vol. XIV, pp. 33–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burchell, J. P. T., 1935, (a), ‘Evidence of a Further Glacial Episode within the Valley of the Lower Thames,’ Geol. Mag., vol. LXXII, pp. 90–1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burchell, J. P. T., 1935, (b), ‘Some Pleistocene Deposits at Kirmington and Crayford,’ Geol. Mag., vol. LXXII, pp. 327–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burchell, J. P. T., 1936, ‘Evidence of a Late Glacial Episode within the Valley of the Lower Thames,’ Geol. Mag., vol. LXXIII, pp. 91–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandler, R. H., 1914, ‘The Pleistocene Deposits of Crayford,’ Proc. Geol. Assoc, vol. XXV, pp. 61–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandler, R. H., 1915. ‘Implements of Les Eyzies-type and a Working-floor in the River Cray Valley,’ Proc. Preh. Soc. E. Anglia, vol. II, pp. 80–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandler, R. H., 1916, ‘The Implements and Cores of Crayford,’ Proc. Preh. Soc. E. Anglia, vol. II, pp. 240–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandler, R. H., 1930, ‘On the Clactonian Industry at Swanscombe,’ Proc. Preh. Soc. E. Anglia, vol. VI, pp. 79–116 Google Scholar
Chandler, R. H., and Leach, A. L., 1912, (a), ‘On the Dartford Heath Gravel and on a Palaeolithic Implement Factory,’ Proc. Geol. Assoc., vol. XXIII, pp. 102–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandler, R. H., and Leach, A. L., 1912, (b), ‘Report on an Excursion to the Lower Tertiary Section and the Pleistocene River Drifts near Erith,’ Proc. Geol. Assoc., vol. XXIII, pp. 183–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, W. H. and Killick, J. R., 1924, ‘On the Discovery of a Flint-working site of Palaeolithic date in the Medway Valley at Rochester, Kent, with Notes on the Drift-Stages of the Medway,’ Proc. Preh. Soc. E. Anglia, vol. IV, pp. 133–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawkins, W. B., 1867, ‘On the Age of the Lower Brick-earths of the Thames Valley,’ Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. XXIII, pp. 91–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawkins, W. B., 1869, ‘On the Distribution of the British Post glacial Mammals,’ Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. XXV, pp. 192–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, W. and others, 1874, ‘Catalogue of the Pleistocene Vertebrata from the Neighbourhood of Ilford, Essex, in the Collection of Sir Antonio Brady.’ London.Google Scholar
Dewey, H., 1931, ‘Palæolithic Thames Deposits,’ Proc. Preh. Soc. E. Anglia, vol. VI, pp. 147–155.Google Scholar
Dewey, H., 1932, ‘The Palæolithic Deposits of the Lower Thames Valley,’ Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. LXXXVIII, pp. 35–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, , Osmund, , 1866, ‘On the Warp … etc.,’ Geol. Mag., vol. III, p. 372.Google Scholar
Hicks, H., 1892, ‘On the Discovery of Mammoth and other Remains in Endsleigh Street, (Euston),’ Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. XLVIII, pp. 453–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinton, M. A. C., 1900, ‘The Pleistocene Deposits of the Ilford and Wanstead District,’ Proc Geol. Assoc., vol. XVI, pp. 271–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinton, M. A. C., 1910, ‘A Preliminary Account of the British Fossil Voles and Lemmings; with some Remarks on the Pleistocene Climate and Geography,’ Proc Geol. Assoc., vol. XXI, pp. 489–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinton, M. A. C., 1924, ‘Rivers and Lakes.’ Sheldon Press, London.Google Scholar
Hinton, M. A. C., 1926, ‘Monograph of the Voles and Lemmings (Microtinæ)’ (Brit. Mus. Cat.), vol. I.Google Scholar
Hinton, M. A. C., and Kennard, A. S., 1901, ‘Contributions to the Pleistocene Geology of the Thames Valley, I: The Grays Thurrock Area, Pt. 1,’ Essex Naturalist, vol. XI, pp. 336–370.Google Scholar
Hinton, M. A. C., and Kennard, A. S., 1905, ‘The Relative Ages of the Stone Implements of the Lower Thames Valley,’ Proc. Geol. Assoc., vol. XIX, pp. 76–100 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinton, M. A. C., and Kennard, A. S., 1907, ‘Contributions to the Pleistocene Geology of the Thames Valley, I: The Grays Thurrock Area, Pt. 2,’ Essex Naturalist, vol. XV, pp. 56–88.Google Scholar
Holmes, T. V., 1892, ‘The New Railway from Grays Thurrock to Romford: sections between Upminster and Romford,’ Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. XLVIII, pp. 365–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, T. V., 1894, ‘Further Notes on some Sections on the New Railway from Romford to Upminster, and on the Relations of the Thames Valley Beds to the Boulder Clay,’ Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. L, pp. 443–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, J. P., 1900, ‘Additions to the Palaeolithic Fauna of the Uphall Brickyard, Ilford, Essex,’ Essex Naturalist, vol. XI, pp. 209–212.Google Scholar
Kennard, A. S., 1916, ‘The Pleistocene Succession in England,’ Proc Preh. Soc. E. Anglia, vol. II, pp. 249–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennard, A. S., and Woodward, B. B., 1902, ‘The Post-Pliocene Non-Marine Mollusca of thėe South of England,’ Proc. Geol. Assoc., vol. XVII, pp. 213–260.Google Scholar
Kennard, A. S., 1922, ‘Post-Pliocene Non-Marine Mollusca of thė East of England,’ Proc. Geol. Assoc., vol. XXXIII, pp. 104–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leach, A. L., 1905, ‘Excursion to Erith and Crayford,’ Proc. Geol. Assoc., vol. XIX, pp. 137–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leeson, J. R. and Laffan, G. B., 1894, ‘On the Geology of the Pleistocene Deposits in the Valley of the Thames at Twickenham, with Contributions to the Fauna and Flora of the Period,’ Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. L, pp. 453–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mantell, G., 1822, ‘The Fossils of the South Downs; or Illustrations of the Geology of Sussex.’ London.Google Scholar
Moir, R., 1931, ‘Further Discoveries of Flint Implements in the Brown Boulder Clay of North-west Norfolk,’ Proc. Preh. Soc. E. Anglia, vol. VI, pp. 306–315 Google Scholar
Owen, R., 1856, ‘Description of a Fossil Cranium of the Musk-Buffalo from the “ Lower-level Drift” at Maidenhead, Berkshire,’ Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. XII, pp. 124–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reid, C., 1887, ‘On the Origin of the Dry Chalk Valleys and of Coombe Rock,’ Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. XLIII, pp. 364–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reid, C., 1916, ‘The Plants of the Late Glacial Stage of the Lea Valley,’ Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. LXXI, pp. 155–63.Google Scholar
Ross, B.R.M., 1931, ‘The Physiographic Evolution of the Kennet-Thames,’ Rep. Brit. Assoc. (London), Section C, p. 368.Google Scholar
Sandford, K. S., 1932, ‘Some Recent Contributions to the Pleistocene Succession in England,’ Geol. Mag., vol. LXIX, pp. 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidtgen, O., and Wagner, W., 1928, ‘Eine Altpaläolithische Jagdstelle bei Wallertheim im Rheinhessen,’ Notisbl. Ver. Erkunde Darmstadt, vol. 5, pt. ll, pp. 1–31.Google Scholar
Smith, R. A., 1911, ‘A Palaeolithic Industry at Northfleet, Kent,’ Archaeologia, vol. LXII, PP. 515–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, R. A., and Dewey, H., 1913, ‘Stratification at Swanscombe,’ Archaeologia, vol. LXIV, pp. 177–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, R. A. and Dewey, H., 1914, ‘The High Terrace of the Thames: etc.,‘ Archaeologia, vol. LXV, pp. 187–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, W. G., 1894, ‘Man the Primeval Savage.’ London.Google Scholar
Solomon, J. D., 1932, ‘The Glacial Succession on the North Norfolk Coast,’ Proc. Geol. Assoc., vol. XLIII, pp. 241–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solomon, J. D., 1935, ‘The Westleton Series of East Anglia, etc.,’ Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. XCI, pp. 216–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spurrell, F. C. J., 1880, ‘On the Discovery of the place where Palaeolithic implements were made at Crayford,’ Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. XXXVI, pp. 544–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spurrell, F. C. J., 1886, ‘Excursion to Erith and Crayford,’ Proc. Geol. Assoc., vol. IX, pp. 213–6.Google Scholar
Treacher, LI. and White, H. J. O., 1909, ‘Excursion to Maidenhead,’ Proc. Geol. Assoc., vol. XXI, pp. 198–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tylor, A., 1869, ‘On Quarternary Gravels,’ Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. XXV, pp. 57–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren, S. H., 1912, ‘On a Late Glacial Stage in the Lea Valley, etc.,’ Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. LXVIII, pp. 213–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren, S. H., 1916, ‘Further Observations on the Late Glacial, or Ponder's End, Stage of the Lea Valley, etc.,’ Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. LXXI, pp. 164–182.Google Scholar
Warren, S. H., 1922, ‘The Mesvinian Industry of Clacton-on-Sea,’ Proc Preh. Soc E. Anglia, vol. III, pp. 1–6.Google Scholar
Warren, S. H., 1923, ‘The Elephas-antiquus Bed of Clacton-on-Sea (Essex) and its Flora and Fauna,’ Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. LXXIX, pp. 606–34.Google Scholar
Warren, S. H., 1924, ‘The Elephant-bed of Clacton-on-Sea,’ Essex Naturalist, vol. XXI, pp. 32–40.Google Scholar
Warren, S. H., 1932, ‘The Palæolithic Industries of the Clacton and Dovercourt Districts,’ Essex Naturalist, vol. XXIV, pp. 1–29.Google Scholar
Clark, J. G. D., Godwin, M. E. and Macfadyen, W. A., 1934, ‘An Early Mesolithic Site at Broxbourne sealed under Boreal Peat,’ Journ. Roy. Anthrop. Inst., vol. LXIV, pp. 101–128.Google Scholar
Wood, S. V., jun., 1866, ‘On the Structure of the Thames Valley and of its Contained Deposits,’ Geol. Mag., vol. III, pp. 57–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodward, B. B., 1890, ‘On the Pleistocene (Non-Marine) Mollusca of the London District,’ Proc. Geol. Assoc., vol. XI, pp. 335–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wooldridge, S. W. and Kirkaldy, J. F., 1936, ‘River Profiles and Denudation Chronology in Southern England,’ Geol. Mag., vol. LXXIII, pp. 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeuner, F., 1936, ‘Diluviale Frostspalten in Schlesien,’ Jber. Geol. Ver. Ober Schlesien, 1935, pp. 97–105.Google Scholar