Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-21T16:45:44.609Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Preliminary Study of Polished Stone Artefacts in Prehistoric Southern Italy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 February 2014

Graham B. O'Hare
Affiliation:
Coxland House, Huntworth, Bridgwater, Somerset TA7 0AJ, England

Abstract

This paper is based on work carried out in 1984 to 1986 for an M.Phil, degree at the University of Lancaster. Virtually no work had been done on the subject for over seventy years and, with the exception of one article (Evett 1973), nothing showing the influence of the work of the Implement Petrology Committee of the Council for British Archaeology. Consequently little information was available which could be used as a basis for further research. Three problems were immediately faced: the time available in which to study artefacts in south Italian museums was severely limited; thin-sectioning could not be used; and due to lack of earlier studies data collection would have to be made blind, without reference to any formal model designed to answer previously formulated questions. These problems were all solved, and this paper outlines the development of, and theoretical and practical justifications for, my methodology, the methodology itself, its application to a sample of polished stone artefacts, the data thus obtained and their interpretation, and wider concerns such as the application of this methodology to other areas.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Prehistoric Society 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Ammerman, A. J. 1979. A Study of obsidian exchange networks in Calabria. World Archaeology 2, 95110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coope, G. R. 1979. The influence of geology on the manufacture of Neolithic and Bronze Age stone implements in the British Isles. In Clough, T. H. McK. and Cummins, W. A. (eds), Stone Axe Studies, 98101. London: Council for British Archaeology.Google Scholar
Cox, K. G., Price, N. B. and Harte, B. 1974. An Introduction to the Practical Study of Crystals, Minerals and Rocks (revised 1st edition). London: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Cummins, W. A. 1979. Neolithic stone axes: distribution and trade.in England and Wales. In Clough, T. H. McK. and Cummins, W. A. (eds), Stone Axe Studies, 512. London: Council for British Archaeology.Google Scholar
Cummins, W. A. 1983. Petrology of stone axes and tools. In Kempe, D. R. C. and Harvey, A. P. (eds), The Petrology of Archaeological Artefacts. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delano Smith, C. 1979. Western Mediterranean Europe: a Historical Geography of Italy, Spain and Southern France since the Neolithic. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Delano Smith, C. 1983. L'ambiente (capitolo primo). In Tinè, S. (ed.), Passo di Corvo e la civiltà neolitica del Tavoliere, 1121. Genova: Sagep Editrice.Google Scholar
Evert, D. 1973. A preliminary note on the typology, functional variability, and trade of Italian Neolithic ground stone axes. Origini 7, 3554.Google Scholar
Fenton, M. B. 1984. The nature of the source and the manufacture of Scottish battle-axes and axe-hammers. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 50, 217–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gimbutas, M. 1982. The Goddesses and Gods of Old Europe: 6500–3500 B.C. Myths and Cult Images (revised edition). London: Thames and Hudson.Google Scholar
Hodder, I. and Lane, P. 1982. A contextual examination of Neolithic axe distribution in Britain. In Ericson, J. E. and Earle, T. K. (eds), Contexts for Prehistoric Exchange, 213–35. New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodder, I. and Malone, C. 1984. Intensive survey of prehistoric sites in the Stilo region, Calabria. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 50, 121–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howell, J. M. 1979. The typology of Scottish stone axes. Scottish Archaeological Forum 11, 1524.Google Scholar
Le Roux, C.-T. 1979. Stone axes of Brittany and the Marches. In Clough, T. H. McK. and Cummins, W. A. (eds), Stone Axe Studies, 4956. London: Council for British Archaeology.Google Scholar
M'Guire, J. D. 1892. Materials, apparatus and processes of the aboriginal lapidary. The American Anthropologist 5, April, 165–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malina, J. 1973. Petroarchaeological notes on manufacturing technology of Neolithic polished stone industry. Scripta Facultatis Scientiae Naturalis Ujep Brunensis, Geologia 2–3 (3), 103107.Google Scholar
Malone, C. 1985. Pots, prestige and ritual in Neolithic southern Italy. In Malone, C. and Stoddart, S. (eds), Papers in Italian Archaeology IV: The Cambridge Conference, Part ii ‘Prehistory’, 118–51. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports, International Series 244.Google Scholar
Malone, C. 1986. Neolithic exchange and ritual networks in the central Mediterranean 5000–3000 bc. In The Neolithic of Europe: The World Archaeological Congress 17 Sept. 1986. Southampton and London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Mantovani, P. 1880. Notizia diversa. Bullettino di Paletnologia Italiana 6 (novembre-dicembre, Ni. 11–12), 197–98.Google Scholar
O'Hare, G. B. 1986. A Preliminary Study of Polished Stone Artefacts in Prehistoric Southern Italy. Unpublished M.Phil, thesis, University of Lancaster.Google Scholar
Reille, M., Triat-Laval, H. and Vernet, J. L. 1980. Les témoignages des structures actuelles de végétation méditerranéenne durant le passé contemporain de l'action de l'homme. In ‘La mise en place, l'évolution et la caractérisation de la flore et de la végétation circumméditerranéennes'. Naturalia Monspeliensia (numéro hors série), 7987. Montpellier: Fondation L. Emberger.Google Scholar
Renfew, C. 1975. Trade as action at a distance: questions of integration and communication. In Sabloff, J. A. and Lamberg-Karlovsky, C. C. (eds), Ancient Civilization and Trade, 359. Albuquerque: S.A.R., University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
Ruggero, G. 1878. Oggetti preistorici calabresi del Catanzarese e del Cosentino. Atti delta Reale Accademia dei Lincei. Memorie della Classe di Scienze fisiche, matematiche e naturali, Serie 3, 2. 457–77.Google Scholar
Tinè, S. 1963. La Grotta di S. Angelo III a Cassano Ionio. Atti e Memorie della Società Magna Grecia, 154.Google Scholar
Tinè, S. 1972. Culto neolitico delle acque nella grotta Scaloria. Bollettino del Centro Camuno di Studî Preistorici B9 (numero riservato al Simposio Internazionale su le Religioni della Preistoria), 34 and 141–42.Google Scholar
Tinè, S. and Isetti, F. 1981. Culto neolitico delle acque e recenti scavi nella Grotta Scaloria. Bullettino di Paletnologia Italiana N.S. 24 (vol. 82) 19751980, 3170.Google Scholar
Walker, D. S. 1967. A Geography of Italy (2nd edition). London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Whitehouse, R. D. 1968. Settlement and economy in southern Italy in the Neothermal period. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 34, 332–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitehouse, R. D. 1969. The Neolithic pottery sequence in southern Italy. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 35, 267310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitehouse, R. D. 1978. Italian prehistory, carbon-14 and the tree-ring calibration. In Blake, H. McK., Potter, T. W. and Whitehouse, D. B. (eds), Papers in Italian Archaeology I: The Lancaster Seminar, Part i, 7191. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports, Supplementary Series 41 (i).Google Scholar
Whitehouse, R. D. 1984. Social organization in the Neolithic of south-east Italy. In Waldren, W. H., Chapman, R., Lewthwaite, J. and Kennard, R.-C. (eds), The Deja Conference of Prehistory: Early Settlement in the Western Mediterranean Islands and the Peripheral Areas, 1109–33. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports, International Series 229.Google Scholar
Whitehouse, R. D. 1985. New radiocarbon dates for the Neolithic of eastern Italy. In Blake, H. and Whitehouse, R. (eds), Lancaster in Italy: Archaeological Research Under-taken in Italy by the Department of Classics and Archaeology in 1984, 3539. Lancaster: University of Lancaster.Google Scholar