Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-fwgfc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-14T16:11:10.170Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Enrichment, enumeration and characterisation of nitrate-reducing bacteria present in sediments of the River Tay Estuary

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2011

G. M. Dunn
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Dundee
J. N. Wardell
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Dundee
R. A. Herbert
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Dundee
C. M. Brown
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Dundee
Get access

Synopsis

Sediments from the River Tay contained higher concentrations of ammonia than nitrate throughout an 18 month sampling cycle. Sediments from Kingoodie Bay and from the North Sea off the Tay Estuary produced nitrite and ammonia when incubated in the presence of nitrate.

The nitrate-reducing bacteria present in Kingoodie Bay sediments were Aeromonasj Vibrio organisms with smaller numbers of enterobacteria and pseudomonads and even smaller numbers of acinetobacters. Continuous culture enrichments of sediments showed that in media containing no added NaCl, acinetobacters predominated anaerobically in the presence of nitrate and acetate while enterobacteria predominated in the presence of nitrate and glycerol. With 0.2M NaCl added to media enterobacteria were predominant, irrespective of carbon source, while with 0.4M NaCl addition pseudomonads predominated in acetate and enterobacteria in glycerol media.

These results indicate that, at the salinities observed in the Tay Estuary at Kingoodie Bay, fermentative bacteria are most likely to be active in nitrate reduction.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baker, K., 1968. Low cost continuous culture apparatus. Lab. Pract., 17, 817824.Google Scholar
Brown, C.M., Ellwood, D. C. and Hunter, J. R., 1977. Growth of bacteria at surfaces: influence of nutrient limitation F.E.M.S. Microbiol. Lett., 1, 163166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, C. M., Ellwood, D. C. and Hunter, J. R., 1978. Enrichments in a chemostat In Lovelock, D. W. and Davies, R. (eds) Techniques for the study of mixed populations, 213222. London: Academic.Google Scholar
Brown, C. M., Mcdonald-Brown, D. S. and Stanley, S. O., 1972. Inorganic nitrogen metabolism in marine bacteria: nitrogen assimilation in some marine bacteria. J. Mar. Biol. Ass. U.K., 52, 793804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, J. A., 1978. The rapid accumulation of large quantities of ammonia during nitrite reduction by Escherichia coli. F.E.M.S. Microbiol. Lett., 4, 327329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowan, S. T. and Steel, K. J., 1974. Manual for the Identification of medical bacteria. Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Dunn, G. M., Herbert, R. A. and Brown, C. M., 1978. Physiology of denitrifying bacteria from tidal mudflats in the River Tay. In McLusky, D. S. and Berry, A. J. (eds) Physiology and Behaviour of Marine Organisms, 135140. Oxford: Pergamon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harder, W., Kuenen, J. G. and Matin, A., 1977. Microbial selection in continuous culture. J. Appl. Bad., 43, 124.Google ScholarPubMed
Herbert, R. A., 1975. A preliminary investigation of the effects of salinity on the bacterial flora of the Tay Estuary. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinb., 75B, 137144.Google ScholarPubMed
Herbert, R. A., Dunn, G. M. and Brown, C. M., 1980. The physiology of nitrate dissimilatory bacteria from the Tay Estuary. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinb., 78B, s79–s87.Google Scholar
Jannasch, H. W., 1967. Enrichments of aquatic bacteria in continuous culture. Arch. Mikrobiol., 59, 165173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar