No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Wood properties of Sitka spruce
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 December 2011
Synopsis
The wood properties of Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis) which influence its use in the production of sawn timber, veneer, particleboard, fibreboard, pulp and paper are discussed. Although the low strength properties of Sitka spruce restrict its use as constructional timber, it is highly suitable for the manufacture of particleboard and fibreboard and is an excellent pulping species.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, Section B: Biological Sciences , Volume 93 , Issue 1-2: Sitka Spruce , 1987 , pp. 205 - 212
- Copyright
- Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1987
References
Brazier, J.D., 1965. An assessment of the incidence and significance of spiral grain in young conifer trees. Forest Products Journal 15, 308–312.Google Scholar
Brazier, J.D., 1977. The effect of forest practices on the quality of the harvested crop. Forestry 50, 49–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brazier, J.D., Hands, R., & Seal, D.T., 1985. Structural wood yields from Sitka spruce: the effect of planting distance. Forestry and British Timber 14, 34–37.Google Scholar
Broughton, J.A.H., 1962. Properties of 30–37 year old Sitka spruce timber. Forest Products Research Bulletin 48.Google Scholar
Building Research Establishment 1977. A Handbook of Softwoods. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Cahalan, C.M., 1985. The geneticist's contribution. In Growing Timber for the Market, pp. 67–73. Institute of Chartered Foresters Spring Discussion Meeting, Edinburgh, March 1985. Edinburgh: Institute of Chartered Foresters.Google Scholar
Cannell, M.G.R., Sheppard, L.F., Ford, E.D., & Wilson, R.H.F., 1983. Clonal differences in dry matter distribution, wood specific gravity and foliage ‘efficiency’ in Picea sitchensis and Pinus contorta. Silvae Genetica 32, 195–202.Google Scholar
Dinwoodie, J.M., 1963. Variation in tracheid length in Picea sitchensis Carr. Forest Products Research Special Report 16. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Forest Products Research Laboratory. 1967. Home Grown Timbers. Sitka and Norway Spruce. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Lavers, G.M., 1969. The strength properties of timbers. Forest Products Research Bulletin 50.Google Scholar
Low, A.J., (ed.) 1985. Guide to upland restocking practice. Forestry Commission Leaflet 84. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Panshin, A.J., & de Zeeuw, C., 1980. Textbook of Wood Technology. 4th. ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Pettersen, R.C., 1984. The chemical composition of wood. In: Rowell, R.M., (ed.) The Chemistry of Solid Wood. Advances in Chemistry 207, 57–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Purslow, D.F., 1976. Results of field tests on the natural durability of timber (1932–1975). Building Research Establishment Current Paper CP 6/76.Google Scholar
Redding, L.W., 1971. Resistance of timbers to impregnation with creosote. Forest Products Research Bulletin 54.Google Scholar
Savill, P.S., & Sandels, A.J., 1983. The influence of early respacing on the wood density of Sitka spruce. Forestry 54, 17–29.Google Scholar
Stevens, W.C., & Johnston, D.D., 1961. The seasoning properties of home-grown Sitka spruce. Journal of the Institute of Wood Science 7, 28–33.Google Scholar
Sunley, J.G., & Lavers, G.M., 1961. Variations in the strength and specific gravity of Sitka spruce grown in Great Britain. Journal of the Institute of Wood Science 7, 15–27.Google Scholar
Woolridge, T.H., 1979. The future use of British softwood timber. Scottish Forestry 33, 253–257.Google Scholar