Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-npwhs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T01:29:51.549Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

XVII.—Tests for Randomness in a Series of Numerical Observations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2014

W. O. Kermack  and
A. G. McKendrick
W. O. Kermack
Affiliation:
Laboratory of the Royal College of Physicians, Edinburgh
A. G. McKendrick
Affiliation:
Laboratory of the Royal College of Physicians, Edinburgh
Get access

Extract

It is often a matter of considerable importance to decide whether the fluctuations exhibited by a series of observations are random in character, or whether some factor operating according to a definite law must be assumed to exist. One general method of testing a statistical hypothesis is to work out results which would be expected theoretically, and then to compare these with the observations. A statistic such as the mean or standard deviation to be observed on a particular hypothesis may be calculated and compared with the actual mean or standard deviation as evaluated from the observed figures. Agreement does not necessarily imply that the hypothesis is a true one, or even that it is consistent with the observations, because it might be found that when another statistic was calculated, the agreement was no longer satisfactory. Obviously the greater the number of tests applied and found satisfactory, the greater the confidence which can be placed in the conclusions.

Information

Type
Proceedings
Information
Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 57 , 1938 , pp. 228 - 240
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1938

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

References to Literature

André, D., 1884. Ann. Sci. Éc. norm. sup. Paris, ser. 3, vol. i, p. 121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brownlee, J., 1918. Proc. Roy. Soc. Med. (Section of Epidemiology and State Medicine), vol. xii, p. 78.Google Scholar
Greenwood, M., Bradford Hill, A., Topley, W. W. C., and Wilson, J., 1936. “Experimental Epidemiology,” Med. Res. Cl. Special Reports, no. 209, p. 70et seq.Google Scholar
Macmahon, P. A., 1915. Combinatory Analysis, vol. i, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Netto, E., 1901. Lehrbuch der Combinatorik, pp. 106–116.Google Scholar
Statistisk Årsbok för Sverige, 1931, Table 27, p. 34.Google Scholar
Walker, G. T., 1931. Proc. Roy. Soc., A, vol. cxxxi, pp. 518–532.Google Scholar
“World Weather Records, 1934,” Smith. Misc. Coll., vol. xc, pp. 511–516.Google Scholar