Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-n9wrp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T09:30:57.826Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Thursday, December 12th, 1867

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 May 2010

Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Proceedings
Information
Proceedings of the Society of Antiquaries of London , Volume 4 , June 1870 , pp. 36 - 43
Copyright
Copyright © The Society of Antiquaries of London 1870

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 39 note * Dur. Rat. Dis. Off. lib. vii. c, 35, De Officio Mortuorum.—“Deinde ponitur (corpus) in speluncâ, in quâ in quibusdam. locis ponitur aqua benedicta et pruina cum thure. Aqua benedicta, ne dæmones qui multum earn timent, ad corpus aceedant.”—See also Archæologia, xxxviii. 336, for Mr. Akerman's notes on the discovery of vessels calculated for holding liquids in Anglo-Saxon graves.

page 41 note * In the first account given by De Rossi (Bull. Arch. 1867, No. 3) no mention occurs of this bust. My explanation was given in the octave after the Festival of St. Peter, and in the presence of the persons I have already named. In his second account we read “it is possibly Charlemagne or one of his next successors.” I take no account of Louis the Pious, nor Lolhaire, but consider it to be indubitably Charles the Bald.