No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Difficult to Count, Important to Measure: Assessing Democratic Backsliding
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 January 2024
Extract
Assessing the state of democracy and freedom is an important but difficult task. The stakes are high, not only for researchers interested in uncovering the drivers of democratic consolidation or decline but also for policy makers, civil society organizations, journalists, activists, and citizens who work daily to promote and protect human rights at home and abroad. In light of the significance of the task, it is not surprising that the issue of how to measure democracy most accurately continues to be hotly debated.
- Type
- Comment and Controversy
- Information
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of American Political Science Association
References
REFERENCES
Boese, Vanessa A. 2019. “How (Not) to Measure Democracy.” International Area Studies Review 22 (2): 95–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collier, David, and Levitsky, Steven. 1997. “Democracy with Adjectives: Conceptual Innovation in Comparative Research.” World Politics 49 (3): 430–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coppedge, Michael, Gerring, John, Altman, David, Bernhard, Michael, Fish, Steven, Hicken, Allen, Kroeig, Matthew, Lindberg, Staffan I., McMann, Kelly, Paxton, Pamela, Semetko, Holli A., Skaaning, Svend-Erik, Staton, Jeffrey, and Teorell, Jan. 2011. “Conceptualizing and Measuring Democracy: A New Approach.” Perspectives on Politics 9 (2): 247–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. 1971. Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven, CT, and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Diamond, Larry. 1999. Developing Democracy: Toward Consolidation. Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freedom in the World Methodology
. 2018. Washington, DC: Freedom House. https://freedomhouse.org/sites/default/files/2020-02/Methodology_FIW_2018_for_website.pdf.Google Scholar
Gastil, Raymond D. 1978. Freedom in the World: Political Rights and Civil Liberties. Boston: Freedom House.Google Scholar
Gerring, John, Knutsen, Carl Henrik, Maguire, Matthew, Skaaning, Svend-Erik, Teorell, Jan, and Coppedge, Michael. 2021. “Democracy and Human Development: Issues of Conceptualization and Measurement.” Democratization 28 (2): 308–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gorokhovskaia, Yana. 2023. “Replication Data for ‘Difficult to Count, Important to Measure: Assessing Democratic Backsliding.’” PS: Political Science & Politics Harvard Dataverse. DOI:10.7910/DVN/Y6OWN2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karl, Terry L., and Schmitter, Philippe C.. 1991. “What Democracy Is…and Is Not.” Journal of Democracy 2 (3): 75–88.Google Scholar
Levitsky, Steven, and Way, Lucan. 2010. Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes after the Cold War. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitsky, Steven, and Way, Lucan. 2015. “The Myth of Democratic Recession.” Journal of Democracy 26 (1): 45–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linz, Juan J., and Stepan, Alfred. 1996. Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe. Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Little, Andrew T., and Meng, Anne. 2023. “Measuring Democratic Backsliding.” PS: Political Science & Politics. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4327307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munck, Gerardo L., and Verkuilen, Jay. 2002. “Conceptualizing and Measuring Democracy: Evaluating Alternative Indices.” Comparative Political Studies 35 (1): 5–34.Google Scholar
Platter, Mark F. 2002. “Globalization and Self-Government.” Journal of Democracy 13 (3): 54–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Repucci, Sarah, and Slipowitz, Amy. 2022. Freedom in the World 2022: The Global Expansion of Authoritarian Rule. Washington, DC: Freedom House.Google Scholar