Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T07:09:09.906Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Ethnographic Turn in Political Science: Reflections on the State of the Art

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 January 2017

Evelyn Z. Brodkin
Evelyn Z. Brodkin*
Affiliation:
The University of Chicago
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Symposium: Ethnography and Participant Observation: Political Science Research in this “Late Methodological Moment”
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 50 , Issue 1 , January 2017 , pp. 131 - 134
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Brodkin, Evelyn Z. 2013a. “Street-Level Organizations and Welfare State Politics.” In Work and the Welfare State, ed. Brodkin, E. Z. and Marston, G., 17–34. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Brodkin, Evelyn Z. 2013b. “Commodification, Inclusion, or What? Workfare in Everyday Organizational Life.” In Work and the Welfare State, ed. Brodkin, E. Z. and Marston, G., 143–166. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. 1956. A Preface to Democratic Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Herd, Dean and Lightman, Ernie. 2005. “Rituals of Degradation: Administration as Policy in the Ontario Works Programme.” Social Policy & Administration 39 (1): 65–79.Google Scholar
Korteweg, Anna C. 2006. “The Construction of Gendered Citizenship at the Welfare Office: An Ethnographic Comparison of Welfare-to-Work Workshops in the United States and the Netherlands.” Social Politics 13 (3): 313–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larsen, Flemming and Wright, Sharon. 2014. “Interpreting the Marketisation of Employment Services in Great Britain and Denmark.” Journal of European Social Policy 24 (5): 455–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lasswell, Harold D. 1936. Politics: Who Gets What, When, How. New York: Whittlesey House.Google Scholar
Lens, Vicki 2013. “Redress and Accountability in Work Activation Policies in the United States.” In Work and the Welfare State, ed. Brodkin, E. Z. and Marston, G., 249–267. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Levine, Judith 2013. Ain’t No Trust: How Bosses, Boyfriends, and Bureaucrats Fail Low-Income Mothers and Why It Matters. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Lipsky, Michael 1980. Street-level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Lipsky, Michael and Levi, Margaret. 1972. “Community Organization as a Political Resource.” In People and Politics in Urban Society. ed. Hahn, H., 175–199. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
Infantino, Federica 2016. Outsourcing Border Control: Politics and Practice of Contracted Visa Policy in Morocco. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Piven, Frances Fox and Cloward, Richard A.. 1971. Regulating the Poor: The Functions of Public Welfare. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Piven, Frances Fox and Cloward, Richard A.. 1979. Poor People’s Movements: Why They Succeed and How They Fail. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Schatz, Edward, ed. 2009. Political Ethnography: What Immersion Brings to the Study of Power. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Scott, James C. 1985. Weapons of the Weak: Everyday forms of Peasant Resistance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Soss, Joe, Fording, Richard C., and Schram, Sanford F.. 2011. Disciplining the Poor: Neoliberal Paternalism and the Persistent Power of Race. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watkins-Hayes, C. 2011. “Race, Respect, and Red Tape: Inside the Black Box of Racially Representative Bureaucracies.” Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory 21: 233–51.Google Scholar