Article contents
The Future of Election Forecasting: More Data, Better Technology
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 14 April 2014
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
![Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'](https://static.cambridge.org/content/id/urn%3Acambridge.org%3Aid%3Aarticle%3AS1049096514000122/resource/name/firstPage-S1049096514000122a.jpg)
- Type
- Symposium: US Presidential Election Forecasting
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Political Science Association 2014
References
REFERENCES
Bartlett, Tom. 2012. “The Poll Quants Won the Election.” The Chronicle of Higher Education. http://chronicle.com/blogs/percolator/the-poll-quants-won-the-election/31722.Google Scholar
Blumenthal, Mark. 2012. “2012 Poll Accuracy: After Obama, Models and Survey Science Won the Day.” The Huffington Post. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/11/07/2012-poll-accuracy-obama-models-survey_n_2087117.html.Google Scholar
Campbell, James E. 2001. “The Referendum that Didn’t Happen: The Forecasts of the 2000 Presidential Election.” PS: Political Science & Politics 34 (1): 33–38.Google Scholar
Campbell, James E. 2008. “Editor’s Introduction: Forecasting the 2008 National Elections.” PS: Political Science & Politics 41 (4): 679–82.Google Scholar
Campbell, James E. 2012. “Forecasting the 2012 American National Elections.” PS: Political Science and Politics 45 (4): 610–13.Google Scholar
Cassidy, John. 2012. “Cassidy’s Count: A Victory for the Pollsters and the Forecasters.” The New Yorker. http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/johncassidy/2012/11/cassidys-count-how-obama-won-how-romney-lost.html.Google Scholar
Duch, Raymond M., and Stevenson, Randolph T.. 2008. The Economic Vote: How Political and Economic Institutions Condition Election Results. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Greenfield, Rebecca. 2012. “The Best and Worst Pundit Predictors of 2012.” The Atlantic Wire. http://www.theatlanticwire.com/politics/2012/11/best-and-worst-pundit-predictors-2012/58846.Google Scholar
Issenberg, Sasha. 2010. “Nudge the Vote.” The New York Times Magazine. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/31/magazine/31politics-t.html.Google Scholar
Issenberg, Sasha. 2012. “How President Obamas Campaign Used Big Data to Rally Individual Voters.” MIT Technology Review http://www.technologyreview.com/featuredstory/509026/how-obamas-team-used-big-data-to-rally-voters.Google Scholar
Issenberg, Sasha. 2013. The Victory Lab: The Secret Science of Winning Campaigns. Broadway Books.Google Scholar
Kaplan, Noah, Park, David K. and Gelman, Andrew. 2012. “Understanding Persuasion and Activation in Presidential Campaigns: The Random Walk and Mean Reversion Models.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 42 (4): 843–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klarner, Carl E. 2009. “Forecasting Congressional Elections.” Extension of Remarks; Newsletter of the APSA Legislative Studies Section.Google Scholar
Lauderdale, Benjamin E., and Linzer, Drew A.. 2013. “Under-performing, Over-performing, or Just Performing? The Limitations of Fundamentals-based Presidential Election Forecasting.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Lewis-Beck, Michael S., and Stegmaier, Mary. 2000. “Economic Determinants of Electoral Outcomes.” Annual Review of Political Science 3: 183–219.Google Scholar
Lewis-Beck, Michael S., and Rice, Tom W.. 1984. “Forecasting U.S. House Elections.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 9 (3): 475–86.Google Scholar
Linzer, Drew A. 2013. “Dynamic Bayesian Forecasting of Presidential Elections in the States.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 108 (501): 124–34.Google Scholar
Marketplace. 2012. “Post-election, a Polling Conundrum: Interview with Frank Newport.”http://www.marketplace.org/topics/elections/attitude-check/post-election-polling-conundrum.Google Scholar
Montgomery, Jacob M., Hollenbach, Florian M., and Ward, Michael D.. 2012. “Ensemble Predictions of the 2012 US Presidential Election.” PS: Political Science and Politics 45 (4): 651–54.Google Scholar
Nannestad, Peter, and Paldam, Martin. 1994. “The VP-function: A survey of the Literature on Vote and Popularity Functions after 25 Years.” Public Choice 79 (3–4): 213–45.Google Scholar
Nyhan, Brendan. 2012. “Pundits versus Probabilities; The Misguided Backlash against Nate Silver.” Columbia Journalism Review. http://www.cjr.org/united_states_project/pundits_versus_probabilities.php.Google Scholar
Peltzman, Sam. 1987. “Economic Conditions and Gubernatorial Elections.” The American Economic Review 77 (2): 293–297.Google Scholar
Scherer, Michael. 2012. “Inside the Secret World of the Data Crunchers Who Helped Obama Win.” Time: Swampland. http://swampland.time.com/2012/11/07/inside-the-secret-world-of-quants-and-data-crunchers-who-helped-obama-win.Google Scholar
Silver, Nate. 2012. “Methodology.” FiveThirtyEight. http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/methodology.Google Scholar
Economist, The. 2012. “Politics and Statistics; March of the Nerds.”http://www.economist.com/blogs/democracyinamerica/2012/11/politics-and-statistics.Google Scholar
Ward, Jon. 2013. “Republican National Committee Hires Senior Facebook Engineer As Chief Technology Officer.” The Huffington Post. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/06/04/republican-national-commi_n_3386575.html.Google Scholar
Wilner, Elizabeth. 2013a. “The Cook Political Report ‘Big Data At-A-Glance’.” The Cook Political Report. http://cookpolitical.com/story/5804.Google Scholar
Wilner, Elizabeth. 2013b. “The Survey Monkey on Our Back: Where Our Addiction to Polls May Take Us.” The Cook Political Report. http://cookpolitical.com/story/5777.Google Scholar
- 3
- Cited by