Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-t6hkb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-15T22:50:59.081Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Political Knowledge after September 11

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 September 2002

Markus Prior
Affiliation:
Stanford University and Princeton University

Abstract

In this article, I examine how 9/11 and the subsequent efforts to combat terrorism have affected what people know about politics. My analysis suggests three main differences between knowledge before and after 9/11. First, knowledge of 9/11 and the “war on terrorism” shot up to uncommonly high levels, just as common sense and our theories would predict. The second point is less intuitive: Heightened interest spread to issues not directly related to the terrorist attacks and appears to have increased knowledge of politics more broadly. Finally, a comparison between knowledge related to 9/11 and general political knowledge reveals that some of the usual obstacles to learning did not matter in the aftermath of 9/11. A low sense of civic duty, lack of faith in government responsiveness, and a full-time job all kept people from getting informed about politics in general, but not from learning about the terrorist attacks and the war on terrorism.

Type
SYMPOSIUM
Copyright
© 2002 by the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I would like to thank Scott Althaus, Mo Fiorina, Shanto Iyengar, and Paul Sniderman for helpful comments.