Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-2h6rp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-11T10:11:03.220Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Political Science Teaching Across Europe

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 October 2016

Jacqui Briggs*
Affiliation:
Lincoln University

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Symposium: The Discipline of Political Science in Europe: How Different Is It from Political Science in North America?
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anson, Ian G. 2015. “Assessment Feedback using Screencapture Technology in Political Science.” Journal of Political Science Education 11 (4): 375–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashe, Fidelma. 2012. “Harnessing Political Theory to Facilitate Students’ Engagement with Graduate ‘Employability’: A Critical Pyramid Approach.” Politics 32 (2): 129–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bingham Powell, G. Jr., Dalton, Russel J., and Strøm, Kaare. 2012. Comparative Politics Today: A World View, tenth edition, chapter 19: 664709. New York: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Blair, Alasdair. 2013. “Democratising the Learning Process: The Use of Twitter in the Teaching of Politics and International Relations.” Politics 33 (2): 135–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blair, Alasdair, Curtis, Steven, Goodwin, Mark, and Shields, Sam. 2013. “What Feedback Do Students Want?” Politics 33 (1) February: 6679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blair, Alasdair, Curtis, Steven, and McGinty, Sam [Shields]. 2012 “Is Peer Feedback an Effective Approach for Creating Dialogue in Politics?” European Political Science 12 (1): 102–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Briggs, Jacqui E. and Harrison, Lisa. 2015. ‘The Status of Women in UK Political Science.’ European Political Science 14 (2): 105115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brintnall, Michael and Mealey, Kim A.. 2014. “Advancing Teaching and Learning in Political Science: The role of the American Political Science Association.” European Political Science 13 (2): 159–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunazzo, Marco and Settembri, Pierpaolo. 2015. “Teaching the European Union: a Simulation of Council’s Negotiations.” European Political Science 14 (1) March: 114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buckley, Fiona and Reidy, Theresa. 2014 “Practicing Politics: Student Engagement and Enthusiasm.” European Political Science 13 (4): 340–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caramani, Daniel. ed. 2011. Comparative Politics, second edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Childs, Sarah and Krook, Mona Lena. 2006. “Should Feminists Give Up on Critical Mass? A Contingent Yes.” Politics and Gender 2 (4): 522–30.Google Scholar
Curtis, Steven. 2012. “Politics Placements and Employability: A New Approach.” European Political Science 11 (2): 153–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Department for Business Innovation and Skills. 2015. Fulfilling Our Potential: Teaching Excellence, Social Mobility and Student Choice. November, Cm 9141. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, Mike and Goldsmith, Chris. 2010. “Teaching Political Science in Europe.” European Political Science (9): S61S71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gormley-Heenan, Cathy and McCartan, Kenny. 2009. “Making It Matter: Teaching and Learning in Political Science using an Audience Response System.” European Political Science 8 (3): 379–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guasti, Petra, Muno, Wolfgang, and Niemann, Arne. 2015. “Introduction – EU Simulations as a Multi-Dimensional Resource: From Teaching and Learning Tool to Research Instrument.” European Political Science, symposium . 14 (3): 205–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hague, Rod and Harrop, Martin. 2010. Comparative Government and Politics: An Introduction, eighth edition. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Harris, Clodagh and Quinn, Brid. 2015. “Teaching, Assessment and Professional Development: Praxis in Ireland’s Political Science Community.” Irish Political Studies 30 (2): 255–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ishiyama, John. 2012. Comparative Politics: Principles of Democracy and Democratization. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Klingemann, Hans-Dieter, ed. 2007. The State of Political Science in Western Europe. Opladen, Germany: Barbara Budrich Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lane, J-E. and Ersson, S.. 1999. Politics and Society in Western Europe, fourth edition. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lightfoot, Simon and Piotukh, Volha. 2015. “The Research-Teaching Nexus in Politics and International Relations in the UK: A Survey of Practices and Attitudes.” Politics 35 (1): 99110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neary, Mike and Winn, Joss. 2009 “The Student as Producer: Reinventing the Student Experience in Higher Education.” In Bell, Les, Stevenson, Howard, and Neary, Mike. eds. The Future of Higher Education: Policy, Pedagogy and the Student Experience, 192210. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Obendorf, Simon and Randerson, Claire. 2013. “Evaluating the Model United Nations: Diplomatic Simulation as Assessed Undergraduate Coursework.” European Political Science 12 (3): 350–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, Edward C. 2015. “Undergraduate Research: An Apprenticeship Approach to Teaching Political Science Methods.” European Political Science 14 (3): 340–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pleschová, Gabriela. 2014 “Promoting Political Science Education in Europe: How Can ECPR Support Their Members in Their Work as Political Science Teachers?” European Political Science 13 (2): 138–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quality Assurance Agency. 2015. Subject Benchmark Statement: Politics and International Relations. Gloucester, UK: Quality Assurance Agency.Google Scholar
Ralph, Jason, Head, Naomi, and Lightfoot, Simon. 2010. “Pol-casting: The Use of Podcasting in the Teaching and Learning of Politics and International Relations.” European Political Science 9 (1): 1324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raymond, Chad and Usherwood, Simon. 2013. “Assessment in Simulations.” Journal of Political Science Education 9 (2): 157–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinalda, R. and Kulesza, E.. 2006. The Bologna Process: Harmonizing Europe’s Higher Education, second edition. Opladen, Germany: Barbara Budrich Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saul, H. 2014. “Universities Receive 20,000 Complaints from Students ‘Demanding More’ for £9,000 fee.” The Independent, Tuesday, June 3. http://www.independent.co.uk/student/universities-receive-20000-complaints-from-students-demanding-more-for-9000-fee-9476384.html accessed December 21, 2015.Google Scholar
Smith, Rogers M. 1993. “Beyond Tocqueville, Myrdal and Hartz: The Multiple Traditions in America.” American Political Science Review 87 (3): 549–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spencer, Steve. 2012. “Teaching Race and Ethnicity: Towards an Engaged, Anti-Racist Pedagogy.” In Gormley-Heenan, C. and Lightfoot, Simon, eds. Teaching Politics and International Relations, chapter 13, 179197. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Mark Zachary. 2009. “Podcast Lectures as a Primary Teaching Technology: Results of a One-Year Trial.” Journal of Political Science Education 5 (2): 135–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thornton, Steven. 2012. “Issues and Controversies Associated with the Use of New technologies.” In Gormley-Heenan, C. and Lightfoot, S., eds. Teaching Politics and International Relations, 91104. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
USA Today . 2015. “Million Student March protests student debt, tuition rates.” USA Today, November 12. http://college.usatoday.com/2015/11/12/million-student-march-debt-tuition/ accessed December 21, 2015.Google Scholar
Valeriano, Brandon. 2013. “Teaching Introduction to International Politics with Film.” Journal of Political Science Education 9 (1): 5272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zepke, Nick and Leach, Linda. 2010. “Improving Student Engagement: Ten Proposals for Action.” Active Learning in Higher Education 11 (3): 167–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar