Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-vt8vv Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-09-01T18:38:07.287Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reclaiming Constructivism: Identity and the Practice of the Study of International Relations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 January 2017

Jarrod Hayes
Jarrod Hayes*
Affiliation:
Georgia Institute of Technology
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Symposium: The Politics of Constructivist International Relations in the US Academy
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 50 , Issue 1 , January 2017 , pp. 89 - 92
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abrams, Dominic, Wetherell, Margaret, Cochrane, Sandra, Hogg, Michael A., and Turner, John C.. 1990. “Knowing What to Think By Knowing Who You Are: Self-Categorization and the Nature of Norm Formation, Conformity and Group Polarization.” British Journal of Social Psychology 29 (2): 97–119.Google Scholar
Barder, Alexander D. and Levine, Daniel J.. 2012. “‘The World Is Too Much with Us’: Reification and the Depoliticising of Via Media Constructivist IR.” Millennium—Journal of International Studies 40 (3): 585–604.Google Scholar
Byrne, John Aidan. 2015. “Young People Turn Away From Banking Careers to Avoid Stigma.” New York Post, June 7. http://nypost.com/2015/06/07/young-people-turn-away-from-banking-careers-to-avoid-stigma/.Google Scholar
Hofferberth, Matthias and Weber, Christian. 2015. “Lost in Translation: A Critique of Constructivist Norm Research.” Journal of International Relations and Development 18 (1): 75–103.Google Scholar
Hogg, Michael A. 2000. “Subjective Uncertainty Reduction through Self-categorization: A Motivational Theory of Social Identity Processes.” European Review of Social Psychology 11 (1): 223–55.Google Scholar
Isaac, Jeffrey C. 2015. “For a More Public Political Science.” Perspectives on Politics 13 (02): 269–83.Google Scholar
Levine, Daniel J. and Barder, Alexander D.. 2014. “The Closing of the American Mind: ‘American School’ International Relations and the State of Grand Theory.” European Journal of International Relations 20 (4): 863–88.Google Scholar
Maliniak, Daniel, Peterson, Susan, Powers, Ryan, and Tierney, Michael J.. 2014. “TRIP 2014 Faculty Survey Report.” Teaching, Research and International Policy. https://trip.wm.edu/reports/2014/rp_2014/index.php.Google Scholar
Maliniak, Daniel, Peterson, Susan, and Tierney, Michael J.. 2011. TRIP Around the World: Teaching, Research, and Policy Views of International Relations Faculty in 20 Countries. Williamsburg, VA: College of William and Mary. https://www.wm.edu/offices/itpir/_documents/trip/trip_around_the_world_2011.pdf.Google Scholar
McCourt, David M. 2016. “Practice Theory and Relationalism as the New Constructivism.” International Studies Quarterly 60: 475–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitzen, Jennifer. 2006. “Ontological Security in World Politics: State Identity and the Security Dilemma.” European Journal of International Relations 12 (3): 341–70.Google Scholar
Oldmeadow, Julian A., Platow, Michael J., Foddy, Margaret, and Anderson, Donna. 2003. “Self-Categorization, Status, and Social Influence.” Social Psychology Quarterly 66 (2): 138–52.Google Scholar
Onuf, Nicholas Greenwood. 1989. World of Our Making: Rules and Rule in Social Theory and International Relations. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Parry, Marc. 2015. “A Harvard Economist. A Coup Plot. A Career Forever Changed.” Chronicle of Higher Education, October 16. http://chronicle.com/article/An-Economist-Turns-Sleuth/233802/.Google Scholar
Peterson, Susan, Tierney, Michael J., and Maliniak, Daniel. 2005. Teaching and Research Practices, Views on the Discipline, and Policy Attitudes of International Relations Faculty at U.S. Colleges and Universities. Williamsburg, VA: College of William and Mary. https://www.wm.edu/offices/itpir/_documents/trip/trip_summary2005.pdf.Google Scholar
Price, Richard and Reus-Smit, Christian. 1998. “Dangerous Liaisons?: Critical International Theory and Constructivism.” European Journal of International Relations 4 (3): 259–94.Google Scholar
Ruggie, John Gerard. 1998. “What Makes the World Hang Together? Neo-Utilitarianism and the Social Constructivist Challenge.” International Organization 52 (4): 855–85.Google Scholar
Steele, Brent J. 2008. Ontological Security in International Relations: Self-Identity and the IR State. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Tajfel, Henri and Turner, John. 1979. “An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict.” In The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations, edited by Austin, William G. and Worchel, Stephen, 33–47. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
Wendt, Alexander E. 1987. “The Agent–Structure Problem in International Relations Theory.” International Organization 41 (3): 335–70.Google Scholar