Ackerly, Brooke A., Friedman, Elisabeth Jay, Menon, Krishna, and Zalewski, Marysia. 2020. “Research Ethics and Epistemic Oppression.” International Feminist Journal of Politics 22 (3): 309–11. DOI: 10.1080/14616742.2020.1771006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

American Political Science Association. 2015. “About,” Qualitative Transparency Deliberations. www.qualtd.net/page/about#:~:text=The%20Qualitative%20Transparency%20Deliberations%20%28QTD%29%20platform%20provides%20fora,range%20of%20qualitative%20empirical%20approaches%20in%20Political%20Science.Google Scholar

American Political Science Association. 2020. “About the Editors; Vision Statement by Editors.” American Political Science Review. July. www.apsanet.org/Publications/Journals/American-Political-Science-Review/About-the-Editors.Google Scholar

Ansoms, An, Bisoka, Aymar Nyenyezi, and Thomson, Susan (eds.). Forthcoming. Fieldwork in Africa: The Ethics of Researcher Vulnerability. London: James Currey Publishers.Google Scholar

Autesserre, Severine. 2021. The Frontlines of Peace: An Insider’s Guide to Changing the World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bouka, Yolande. 2015. “Researching Violence in Africa as a Black Woman: Notes from Rwanda.” Working Paper Series. http://conflictfieldresearch.colgate.edu/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/Bouka_WorkingPaper-May2015.pdf.Google Scholar

Clark-Kazak, Christina. 2007. “Understanding Vulnerability: From Categories to Experiences of Congolese Young People in Uganda.” Children & Society 21 (4): 284–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cronin-Furman, Kate, and Lake, Milli. 2018. “Ethics Abroad: Fieldwork in Fragile and Violent Contexts.” PS: Political Science & Politics 51 (3): 607–14.Google Scholar

Firchow, Pamina, and Gellman, Mneesha. 2021. “Collaborative Methodologies: Why, How, and for Whom?” PS: Political Science & Politics. doi: 10.1017/S1049096521000330.Google Scholar

Fujii, Lee Ann. 2012. “Research Ethics 101: Dilemmas and Responsibilities.” PS: Political Science & Politics 45 (4): 717–23.Google Scholar

Gellman, Mneesha. 2021. “Collaborative Methodology with Indigenous Communities: A Framework for Addressing Power Inequalities.” PS: Political Science & Politics. doi: 10.1017/S1049096521000299.Google Scholar

Häkli, Jouni. 2020. “What Can a Flat Ontology Teach the Legislator?” Dialogues in Human Geography. https://doi.org/10.1177/2043820620940055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harding, Sandra. 1987. “The Method Question.” Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy 2 (3) Part 1: 19–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jacobs, Alan M., Büthe, Tim, Ana Arjona, Leonard R. Arriola, Eva Bellin, Andrew Bennett, Lisa Bjorkman, et al. 2021. “The Qualitative Transparency Deliberations: Insights and Implications.” Perspectives on Politics. doi: 10.1017/S1537592720001164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kapiszewski, Diana, MacLean, Lauren Morris, and Read, Benjamin L. (eds.). 2015. Field Research in Political Science: Practices and Principles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krystalli, Roxani C. 2021. “Narrating Victimhood: Dilemmas and (In)Dignities.” International Feminist Journal of Politics. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616742.2020.1861961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lake, Milli, Majic, Samantha, and Maxwell, Rahsaan. 2019. “Research on Vulnerable and Marginalized Populations.” February 13. American Political Science Association Organized Section for Qualitative and Multi-Method Research, Qualitative Transparency Deliberations, Working Group Final Reports, Report IV.3. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3333511.Google Scholar

Lemarchand, Rene. 2021. Remembering Genocides in Central Africa. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leonardo, Zeus. 2018. “Dis-Orienting Western Knowledge: Coloniality, Curriculum and Crisis.” Cambridge Journal of Anthropology 36 (2): 7–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

MacLean, Lauren M., Posner, Elliot, Thomson, Susan, and Wood, Elisabeth Jean. 2019. “Research Ethics and Human Subjects: A Reflexive Openness Approach.” February 12. American Political Science Association Organized Section for Qualitative and Multi-Method Research, Qualitative Transparency Deliberations, Working Group Final Reports, Report I.2. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3332887.Google Scholar

Mama, Amina. 2000. “Why We Must Write: Personal Reflections on Linking the Alchemy of Science with the Relevance of Activism.” Agenda: Empowering Women for Gender Equity 46:13–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mbembe, Achille. 2000. On the Postcolony. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Parkinson, Sarah E. 2018. “The Dignity of Complexity: Being Human in Political Science.” Qualitative and Multi-Method Research (Special Issue Remembering Lee Ann Fujii) 16 (1): 39–41.Google Scholar

Quatrini, Allison. 2020. “If My Participants Say, “You’re Wrong,” Does It Mean I Really Am?” Qualitative and Multi-Method Research, August 21.Google Scholar

Schatz, Edward (ed.). 2009. Political Ethnography: What Immersion Contributes to the Study of Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schwartz-Shea, Peregrine. 2014. “Judging Quality: Evaluative Criteria and Epistemic Communities.” In Interpretation and Method: Empirical Research Methods and the Interpretative Turn, second edition, ed. Yanow, Dvora and Schwartz-Shea, Peregrine, 120–146. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar

Schwartz-Shea, Peregrine, and Yanow, Dvora. 2012. Interpretative Research Design: Concepts and Processes. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Smith, Linda Tuhiwai. 2012. Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples, second edition. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar

Soedirgo, Jessica, and Glass, Aarie. 2020. “Towards Active Reflexivity: Positionality and Practice in the Production of Knowledge.” PS: Political Science & Politics 53 (3): 527–31.Google Scholar

Thomson, Susan. 2009. “‘That Is Not What We Authorised You to Do…’: Access and Government Interference in Highly Politicised Research Environments.” In Surviving Field Research: Working in Violent and Difficult Situations, ed. Sriram, Chandra Lekha, King, John C., Mertus, Julie A., Martín-Ortega, Olga, and Herman, Johanna, 108–24. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Thomson, Susan. 2013a. Whispering Truth to Power: Everyday Resistance to Reconciliation in Post-Genocide Rwanda. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar

Thomson, Susan. 2013b. “Academic Integrity and Ethical Responsibilities in Post-Genocide Rwanda: Working with Research Ethics Boards to Prepare for Fieldwork with ‘Human Subjects.’” In Emotional and Ethical Challenges for Field Research in Africa: The Story Behind the Findings, ed. Thomson, Susan, Ansoms, An, and Murison, Jude, 139–54. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thomson, Susan. 2013c. “Agency as Silence and Muted Voice: The Problem-Solving Networks of Unaccompanied Somali Refugee Girls in Eastleigh, Nairobi.” Conflict, Security and Development 13 (5): 589–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thomson, Susan. 2019. “Engaged Silences as Political Agency in Post-Genocide Rwanda: Jeanne’s Story.” In Rethinking Silence, Voice and Agency in Contested Gendered Terrains, ed. Parashar, Swati and Parpart, Jane, 110–23. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Thomson, Susan. Forthcoming. “Scholar–Activist? On Relational Accountability and an Ethic of Dissemination.” In Fieldwork in Africa: The Ethics of Researcher Vulnerability, ed. Ansoms, An, Bisoka, Aymar Nyenyezi, and Susan, Thomson. London: James Currey Publishers.Google Scholar

Vlassenroot, Koen. 2020. “Can Collaborative Research Projects Reverse External Narratives of Violence and Conflict.” Africa at LSE blog, May 8. https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/africaatlse/2020/05/08/collaborative-research-methods-projects-reverse-external-narratives-violence-conflict-drc.Google Scholar