Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-k7p5g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T00:35:32.690Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The “East” Becomes the “South”? The “Autumn of the People” and the Future of Eastern Europe

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

Adam Przeworski*
Affiliation:
University of Chicago

Extract

The “Autumn of the People” of 1989 was a dismal failure of the predictive power of political science. Any retrospective explanation of the fall of communism must not only account for the historical developments but must also identify those theoretical assumptions that prevented us from anticipating these developments. If we are so wise now, why were we not equally sage before?

As I learned recently, most terminal cancer patients die of pneumonia. Social science is not very good at sorting out underlying causes and precipitating conditions: witness the 50 years of controversies over the fall of Weimar. And the response to the question “why communism collapsed?” is not the same as to “why did it collapse in the autumn of 1989?” It is easier to explain why communism had to fall than why it did.

The theory of “totalitarianism” could not answer either question: it could not diagnose the cancer and hence the vulnerability to pneumonia.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The American Political Science Association 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Note

1. This article is based on remarks presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco, August 31, 1990.