Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ttngx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-08T07:25:28.035Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Informed Participants or Plainclothes Police? Administrative Agencies in the Child Support Policy-Making Process

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2004

Jo Michelle Beld
Jo Michelle Beld
Affiliation:
St. Olaf College
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Departments
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 37 , Issue 1 , January 2004 , pp. 3 - 5
Copyright
© 2004 by the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baskerville Stephen. 2003 “The Politics of Child Support.” PS: Political Science and Politics 35 (4): 719 720.Google Scholar
Beld Jo M. 2001 “Child Support Guidelines Review Advisory Task Force Final Report.” St. Paul: Minnesota Department of Human Services (April).Google Scholar
Beld Jo M. 2003a “Basic Support Outcomes under SF 1364 and SF 758.” Report prepared for members of the Minnesota State Legislature. (14 April).Google Scholar
Beld Jo M. 2003b “Revisiting ‘The Politics of Fatherhood’: Administrative Agencies, Family Life, and Public Policy.” PS: Political Science and Politics 35 (4): 713 718.Google Scholar
Child Support Performance and Incentive Act of 1998. Pub. L. 105–200, Title II, § 201. Public and Private Laws, 105th Congress. http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/useftp.cgi?IPaddress=162.140.64.21&filename=publ200.105&directory=/diskc/wais/data/105_cong_public_laws. (October 25, 2003).Google Scholar
CSR, Inc. 1996 Evaluation of Child Support Guidelines, Vol. 1: Findings and Conclusions Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, Office of Child Support Enforcement (March). http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cse/rpt/gdl_m.htm. (October 23, 2003).Google Scholar
CSR, Inc. 1996 Evaluation of Child Support Guidelines, Vol. 2: Findings of State Guideline Reviews, State Guideline Studies, and Unstructured Interviews. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, Office of Child Support Enforcement (March). http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cse/rpt/gdl_m.htm. (October 23, 2003).Google Scholar
In re Marriage of Sandra Lee Holmberg v. Ronald Gerald Holmberg, et al. 1999 Supreme Court of Minnesota, C7-97-926, C8-97-1132, C9-98-33, C7-97-1512. Office of Appellate Courts, filed January 28.Google Scholar
Kansas Supreme Court Child Support Guidelines Advisory Committee. 2003 “Report to the Kansas Supreme Court.” (7 February). http://www.kscourts.org/ctruls/csformrpt.pdf. (October 23, 2003).Google Scholar
Morgan Laura W. 2002a Child Support Guidelines: Interpretation and Application. Gaithersburg, NY: Aspen.Google Scholar
Morgan Laura W. 2002b “The Constitutionality of Child Support Guidelines, Part I.” (April). http://www.supportguidelines.com/articles/art200204.html. (October 23, 2003).Google Scholar
Morgan Laura W. 2003 “The Constitutionality of Child Support Guidelines Redux.” (May/June). http://www.supportguidelines.com/articles/art200306.html. (October 23, 2003).Google Scholar
Program Performance Measures, Standards, Financial Incentives, and Penalties. 2001 Code of Federal Regulations. Title 45, Chapter III, Part 305, Sec. 305.2. (October). http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getcfr.cgi. (October 23, 2003).Google Scholar
Secretary's Triennial Child Support Guidelines Review Panel. 2002 “Review of Child Support Guideline § § 20-108.1 and 20-108.2.” Report to the Secretary of Health and Human Resources, the Honorable Jane H. Woods and the General Assembly of Virginia (31 October). http://www.ds.state.va.us/pub/pdf/dcsepanel_final.pdf. (October 24, 2003).Google Scholar
State Court Administrator's Office. 2003 “Expedited Child Support Process Final Evaluation Report.” St. Paul: Minnesota Supreme Court (August).Google Scholar
Venohr Jane C., and Robert G. Williams. 1999 “The Implementation and Periodic Review of State Child Support Guidelines.” Family Law Quarterly 33 (1): 7–37.Google Scholar
Venohr Jane C., and Tracy E. Griffith. 2002 “Report on the Michigan Child Support Formula.” Denver: Policy Studies Inc. (12 April). http://www.courts.mi.gov/scao/services/focb/formula/psireport.htm. (October 25, 2003).Google Scholar