Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qlrfm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T02:36:04.006Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Out of the Past: Theoretical and Methodological Contributions of Congressional History

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

Elaine K. Swift  and
David W. Brady
Elaine K. Swift
Affiliation:
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
David W. Brady
Affiliation:
Stanford University
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
News
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 24 , Issue 1 , March 1991 , pp. 61 - 64
Copyright
Copyright © The American Political Science Association 1991

References

Alford, John R, and Brady, David W 1989. “Personal and Partisan Advantage in U.S. Congressional Elections, 1846–1986.” In Dodd, Lawrence C. and Oppenheimer, Bruce I, eds., Congress Reconsidered. 4th ed. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.Google Scholar
Bogue, Allan G. 1989. The Congressman's Civil War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brady, David W. 1988. Critical Elections and Congressional Policy Making. Stanford: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, Joseph and Brady, David W 1981. “Toward a Diachronie Analysis of Congress.” American Political Science Review 75: 988–1006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, Joseph, and Young, Cheryl D 1989. “Bill Introduction in the Nineteenth Century: A Study of Institutional Change.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 14: 67–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dodd, Lawrence C. 1987. “Woodrow Wilson's Congressional Government and the Modern Congress: The ‘Universal Principle’ of Change.” Congress & The Presidency 14: 33–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiorina, Morris P., Rohde, David, and Wissel, Peter. 1975. “Historical Change in House Turnover.” In Ornstein, Norman J., ed., Congress in Change: Evolution and Reform. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Gilligan, Thomas W., and Krehbiel, Keith. 1989. “Asymmetric Information and Legislative Rules with a Heterogeneous Committee.” American Journal of Political Science 33: 459–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garand, James C, and Gross, Donald A 1984. “Changes in the Vote Margins for Congressional Candidates: A Specification of Historical Trends.” American Political Science Review 78: 17–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huckabee, David C. 1989. “Reelection Rates of House Incumbents: 1790–1988.” Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress.Google Scholar
Krehbiel, Keith. 1990. “Are Congressional Committees Composed of Preference Outliers?” American Political Science Review 84: 149–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lienesch, Michael. 1988. New Order of the Ages: Time, the Constitution, and the Making of Modern American Political Thought. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Loewenberg, Gerhard, Patterson, Samuel C, and Jewell, Malcolm E 1985. Handbook of Legislative Research. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Mayhew, David R. 1974. The Electoral Connection. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
McCoy, Drew R. 1980. The Elusive Republic: Political Economy in Jeffersonian America. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, Institute of Early American History and Culture.Google Scholar
Peabody, Robert L. 1969. “Research on Congress: A Coming of Age.” In Huitt, Ralph K. and Peabody, Robert L., eds., Congress: Two Decades of Analysis. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Polsby, Nelson W. 1968. “The Institutionalization of the U.S. House of Representatives.” American Political Science Review 68: 144–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, H. Douglas. 1975. “Congress and the Evolution of Legislative ‘Professionalism.’” In Ornstein, Norman J., ed., Congress in Change: Evolution and Reform. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Schattschneider, E. E. 1975. The Semisovereign People. Hinsdale, IL: The Drysdale Press.Google Scholar
Shepsle, Kenneth A. 1979. “Institutional Arrangements and Equilibrium in Multidimensional Voting Models.” American Journal of Political Science 23: 27–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shepsle, Kenneth A, and Weingast, Barry R 1987. “The Institutional Foundations of Committee Power.” American Political Science Review 81: 85–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silbey, Joel H. 1985. The Partisan Imperative. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sinclair, Barbara. 1989. The Transformation of the U.S. Senate. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skladony, Thomas W. 1985. “The House Goes to Work: Select and Standing Committees in the U.S. House of Representatives.” Congress and the Presidency 12: 165–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, Charles H. 1989. Budget Reform Politics: The Design of the Appropriations Process in the House of Representatives, 1865–1921. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swift, Elaine K. 1987–1988. “The Electoral Connection Meets the Past: Lessons from Congressional History, 1789–1899.” Political Science Quarterly 102: 625–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swift, Elaine K. 1989. “Reconstitutive Change in the U.S. Congress: The Early Senate, 1789–1841.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 14: 175–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Margaret Susan. 1985. The “Spider Web.” Congress and Lobbying in the Age of Grant. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Watts, Steven. 1987. The Republic Reborn: War and the Making of Liberal America, 1790–1820. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, Gordon S. 1969. The Creation of the American Republic, 1776–1787. New York: Norton.Google Scholar