Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-08T00:46:37.997Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Response to “An Incremental Approach to Presidential Nomination Reform” and “Meaningful Participation and the Evolution of the Reformed Presidential Nominating System”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2009

Paul Timmermans
Affiliation:
University of Denver

Extract

In the January issue of PS, papers by William Mayer and by Lonna Atkeson and Cherie Maestas investigate reforms of the party nomination procedure for presidential candidates. In order to avoid the amplification of name recognition and early fundraising advantages, as these effects resulted from the “frontloading” of state nominations ('08 Tsunami Tuesday), broader “spacing” between primary dates may be required. But such an expansion of the sequential voting principle carries an unfortunate disadvantage ignored in the papers. This disadvantage is the, however unintended, consequence of candidates manipulating their program in accordance to methods through which votes are being cast.

Type
Forum
Copyright
Copyright © The American Political Science Association 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)