Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-9q27g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-23T04:27:50.494Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cost-Benefit Analysis, Statistical Decision Theory, and Environmental Policy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2022

Mancur Olson
Mancur Olson*
Affiliation:
University of Maryland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Even a distant glance reveals that in philosophy (as in my own field of economics) it is sometimes best to develop arguments at a very general and abstract level. There are no doubt a great many propositions in logic, epistemology, and the theory of probability, for example, which are relevant to many diverse activities and aspects of reality. If we did not abstract from the peculiarities of particular cases we presumably could not so readily illuminate certain logical or conceptual problems nor so tersely express our findings. This is unquestionably true in economics: there are many important propositions in microeconomic theory, for example, that apply about as well to one industry or society as to another, and both the development and teaching of the theory would be slowed down if highly abstract arguments were to be ruled out.

Type
Part VII. Recent Developments in Rational Decision Theory
Information
PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association , Volume 1976 , Issue 2: Volume Two: Symposia and Invited Papers 1976 , 1976 , pp. 372 - 394
Copyright
Copyright © 1977 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

The author thanks the National Science Foundation and Resources for the Future for support of his research.

This paper is a slightly modified version of a paper that was also presented at the 1975 Annual North American meetings of the Society for General Systems Research. Though the Proceedings of that meeting are evidently not available even in most research-oriented libraries, they have been reproduced or published by the Society under-the title, “Systems Thinking and the Quality of Life” (Washington, D.C.: 1975). The author hopes there will ultimately be time for him to develop some of the lines of inquiry suggested in this paper. He is especially thankful to Fred Suppe for his help and encouragement about this paper and his suggestion that it might be brought to the attention of philosophers of science.

References

[1] Arrow, Kenneth. Essays in the Theory of Risk-Bearing. Chicago: Markham, 1971.Google Scholar
[2] Biderman, Albert. “Social Indicators and Goals.” In Social Indicators. Edited by Bauer, Raymond A.. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1966. Pages 68–153.Google Scholar
[3] Doyle, Peter. “Economic Aspects of Advertising: A Survey.” Economics Journal 78(1968): 570–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4] Fleisher, Belton. The Economics of Delinquency. Chicago: Quadrangle Books, 1966.Google Scholar
[5] Fleisher, Belton “The Effect of Unemployment on Juvenile Delinquency.” Journal of Political Economy LXXI (1963): 543–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6] Fleisher, Belton “The Effect of Income on Delinquency.” American Economic Review LVI(1966): 118–137.Google Scholar
[7] Geisel, M. et.al. “The Effectiveness of State and Local Regulation of Handguns: A Statistical Analysis.” Duke Law Journal (1969): 647–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8] Huxley, Thomas. “On the Educational Value of the Natural History Sciences.” In Science and Education: Essays. New York: D. Appleton and Company, 1892. Pages 38–65.Google Scholar
[9] Kneese, Allen. “The Faustian Bargain.” Resources 44(1973): 1–5.(As reprinted in Erickson, E.W. and Waverman, L. The Energy Question: An International Failure of Policy Vol. I. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1974. Pages 257-266.)Google Scholar
[10] Krutilla, John and Fisher, Anthony. The Economics of Natural Environments. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press for Resources for the Future, 1975.Google Scholar
[11] McKeown, Thomas. Medicine in Modern Society. London: George Allen and Unwin, 1965.Google Scholar
[12] Olson, Mancur. “Social Indicators and Social Accounts.” Socio-economic Planning Sciences 11(1969): 335–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13] Olson, Mancur. The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1971Google Scholar
[14] Raiffa, Howard. Decision Analysis. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1968.Google Scholar
[15] Rawls, John. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1971CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16] Schon, Donald. Beyond the Stable State. New York: Random House, 1971.Google Scholar
[17] U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. Toward a Social Report. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1969.Google Scholar
[18] U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. Equality of Educational Opportunity. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1966.Google Scholar
[19] Weicher, John C. “The Effect of Income on Delinquency: Comment.” American Economic Review LX(1970): 249-256.Google Scholar