Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-k2jvg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-07T03:23:36.238Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Inference in Perception

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2022

Irvin Rock
Irvin Rock*
Affiliation:
Rutgers University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The thesis of this paper is that perception is intelligent in that it is based on the same kinds of operations that characterize thought. However, the dependence of perception on sensory information makes for certain differences between it and “higher” cognitive functions such as imagination and thinking. Clearly the phenomenal experience of a percept is different from that of thought. Still the processes underlying these different mental end products may be quite similar. Although we know little about the nature of thought, a demonstration that perception results from cognitve operations does constitute an explanation. Others seek to explain perception in very different ways.

To turn the problem around so to speak, it is entirely possible that thinking evolved from perception. Perception might be the evolutionary link between low level sensory processes that mediated simple detection of environmental changes in phylogenetically primitive organisms and high level cognitve processes.

Type
Part XI. Inference in Perception
Information
PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association , Volume 1982 , Issue 2: Volume Two: Symposia and Invited Papers 1982 , 1982 , pp. 524 - 540
Copyright
Copyright © 1983 Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Dretske, F.I. (1981). Knowledge and the Flow of Information. Cambridge: Bradford Books/The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gibson, J.J. (1950). The Perception of the Visual World. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co.Google Scholar
Gibson, J.J. (1966). The Senses Considered as Perceptual Systems. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co.Google Scholar
Helmholtz, H. von. (1867). Handbuch der Physiologische Optik. (Part III). Leipzig: L. Voss. (As reprinted as Helmholtz's Treatise on Physiological Optics. Volume III. (trans.) Southall, J.P.C. . Optical Society of America, 1925.).Google Scholar
Mach, E. (1886). Beiträge zur Analyse der Empfindungen. Jena: Gustav Fischer. (As reprinted as Contributions to the Analysis of Sensations, (trans.) Williams, C.M.. Chicago: Open Court Publishing Co., 1897.Google Scholar
Rock, I. (1973). Orientation and Form. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Rock, I. and Anson, R. (1979). “Illusory Contours as the Solution to a Problem.” Perception 8: 665-681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rock, I. (1983). The Logic of Perception. Boston: Bradford Books/MIT Press.Google Scholar
Sigman, E. and Rock, I. (1974). “Stroboscopic Movement Based on Perceptual Intelligence.” Perception 3: 9-28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoper, A.E. (1964). “The Effect of the Structure of the Phenomenal Field on the Occurrence of Stroboscopic Motion.” Paper delivered at Meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Wertheimer, M. (1912). “Experimentelle Studien über das Sehen von Bewegung.” Zeitschrift für Psychologie 61: 161-265.Google Scholar