Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T21:33:06.047Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Genetics of human behaviour

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Joanna Moncrieff
Joanna Moncrieff*
Affiliation:
Section of Epidemiology and General Practice, Institute of Psychiatry, London SE5 8AF
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Ascribing human behaviour to the influence of genetic factors is a reductionist idea that inappropriately applies the explanations of physical science to the human social world. The result is that the designation of some behaviour as deviant is disguised as objective science. The high profile of genetic research means that we must be alert to the potential social consequences of this type of reasoning.

Type
Original papers
Information
Psychiatric Bulletin , Volume 22 , Issue 3 , March 1998 , pp. 158 - 161
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © 1998 The Royal College of Psychiatrists

References

Dilthey, W. (1989) Introduction to the Human Sciences (eds Makkreel, R. A. & Rodi, F.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Farmer, A. & Owen, M. J. (1996) Genomics: the next psychiatric revolution? British Journal of Psychiatry, 169, 135–138.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gould, S. J. (1981) The Mismeasure of Man. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Heidgegger, M. (1962) Being and Time. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Kamin, L. J. (1974) The Science and Politics of I.Q. London: Wiley.Google ScholarPubMed
Lewontin, R. C. (1980) Sociobiology: another biological determinism. International Journal of Health Services, 10, 347–363.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewontin, R. C. (1993) The Doctrine of DNA. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Mark, V. H. & Ervin, F. R. (1970) Violence and the Brain. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Rose, S. P. R. (1997) Lifelines: Biology, Freedom and Determinism (in press). London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Rose, S. P. R. Lewontin, R. C. & Kamin, L. J. (1984) Not in Our Genes. London: Penguin.Google ScholarPubMed
Taylor, C. (1964) The Exploration of Behaviour. New York: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Turner, G. (1996) Intelligence and the X chromosome. Lancet, 347, 1814–1815.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williams, J., Spurlock, G., McGuffin, P., et al (1996) Association between schizophrenia and T102C polymorphism of the 5–hydroxytryptamine type 2a-receptor gene. European Multicentre Association Study of Schizophrenia (EMASS) Group. Lancet, 347, 1294–1296.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Winch, P. (1958) The Idea of a Social Science. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.