Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T06:53:01.269Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Risk Management Authority in Scotland and the forensic psychiatrist as risk assessor

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Laurence Tuddenham  and
John Baird
Laurence Tuddenham
Affiliation:
Leverndale Hospital, 510 Crookston Road, Glasgow, G53 7TU, email: ltuddenham@nhs.net
John Baird
Affiliation:
Leverndale Hospital
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The Risk Management Authority (RMA), Scotland's new body which oversees the conduct of assessments of convicted offenders placed on risk assessment orders, recently held its first annual lecture. This was given by Scotland's new Solicitor General, who observed that risk assessment orders are likely to be reserved for ‘extraordinary crimes committed by extraordinary people’. The first risk assessment orders have been made by Scottish courts and the risk assessors' reports are awaited with interest, not least in England, which has taken a different approach to dangerous offenders (Darjee & Crichton, 2002). It seems timely to review the more novel aspects of the Scottish system and the issues they raise for forensic psychiatry.

Type
Opinion & debate
Information
Psychiatric Bulletin , Volume 31 , Issue 5 , May 2007 , pp. 164 - 166
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 2007

References

Buchanan, A. & Leese, M. (2001) Detention of people with dangerous severe personality disorders: a systematic review. Lancet, 358, 1955–1959.Google Scholar
Cordess, C. (2002) Proposals for managing dangerous people with severe personality disorder: new legislation and new follies in a historical context. Criminal Behavior and Mental Health, 12 (suppl.), S12–S19.Google Scholar
Darjee, R. & Crichton, J. H. M. (2002) The MacLean Committee: Scotland's answer to the dangerous people with severe personality disorder' proposals? Psychiatric Bulletin, 26, 6–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hare, R. D. (2003) Hare PCL–R (2nd edn). Multi-Health Systems.Google Scholar
Hart, S., Kropp, R., Laws, R., et al (2003) The Risk for Sexual Violence Protocol (RSVP). Mental Health, Law and Policy Institute of Simon Fraser University, Pacific Psychological Assessment Corporation & British Columbia Institute Against Family Violence.Google Scholar
Moran, P. (2002) Dangerous severe personality disorder – bad tidings from the UK. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 48, 6–10.Google Scholar
Mullen, P. E. (1999) Dangerous people with severe personality disorder. British proposals for managing them are glaringly wrong – and unethical. BMJ, 319, 1146–1147.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Risk Management Authority (2006a) Risk Assessment Tools Evaluation Directory (version 1). Risk Management Authority.Google Scholar
Risk Management Authority (2006b) Standards and Guidelines for Risk Assessment (version 1). Risk Management Authority.Google Scholar
Royal College of Psychiatrists (2005) The psychiatrist, courts and sentencing: the impact of extended sentencing on the ethical framework of forensic psychiatry. Psychiatric Bulletin, 29, 73–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, C. D., Douglas, K., Eaves, D., et al (1997) HCR–20: Assessing Risk for Violence (Version 2). Simon Fraser University, Mental Health, Law, and Policy Institute.Google Scholar
White, S. M. (2002) Preventive detention must be resisted by the medical profession. Journal of Medical Ethics, 28, 95–98.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.