Hostname: page-component-669899f699-qzcqf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-28T03:21:34.780Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Distortion of body image in the obese: a sensory phenomenon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2009

Rick M. Gardner ,
Renée Martinez ,
Tracy Espinoza  and
Venice Gallegos
Rick M. Gardner*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Southern Colorado, Pueblo, Colorado, USA
Renée Martinez
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Southern Colorado, Pueblo, Colorado, USA
Tracy Espinoza
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Southern Colorado, Pueblo, Colorado, USA
Venice Gallegos
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Southern Colorado, Pueblo, Colorado, USA
*
1Address of correspondence: Dr R. M. Gardner, Department of Psychology, University of Southern Colorado, Pueblo, CO 81001, USA.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Synopsis

Body weight in 42 obese and normal weight subjects was measured using a video TV monitor. Tasks included a continuous task where subjects manipulated the width of their body image on TV, and a discrete task, where they judged the accuracy of their TV image which was presented as either normal, too heavy, or too thin. Subjects rated their full body, body regions which included face, waist, and thighs, and two inanimate control objects. Results from the continuous task revealed that obese subjects overestimated body size more than normals. There was also a significant difference in the ratings of the four body regions, with all regions overestimated. Judgements were more accurate for body regions and control objects on ascending trials where the subjects had to increase the width of the image. No differences were obtained between obese and normals on judgements of the control objects. On the discrete discrimination task, a signal detection analysis revealed sensory sensitivity differences between obese and normal weight subjects. Obese subjects were poorer at detecting size distortions of the body regions. The thin/normal discrimination was more difficult than the heavy/normal discrimination. No response criterion differences were found between obese and control subjects, although subjects adopted a more strict criterion with the thin/normal discriminations. Implications of these findings for clinical intervention in eating disorders are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Psychological Medicine , Volume 18 , Issue 3 , August 1988 , pp. 633 - 641
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Allebeck, P., Hallberg, D. & Espmark, S. (1976). Body image an apparatus for measuring disturbances in estimation of size and shape. Journal of Psychosomatic Research 20, 583–589.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bruch, H. (1962). Perceptual and conceptual disturbances in anorexia nervosa. Psychosomatic Medicine 24, 187–194.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bruch, H. (1973). Eating Disorders. Basic Books: New York.Google Scholar
Collins, J. K., McCabe, M. P. & Jupp, J. J. (1983). Body percept change in obese females after weight reduction therapy. Journal of Clinical Psychology 39, 507–512.3.0.CO;2-K>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dillon, D. J. (1962). Measurement of perceived body size. Perceptual and Motor Skills 14, 191–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, R. M. & Boice, R. (1986). A computer program to generate signal detection theory values for sensitivity and response bias. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers 18 54–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, R. M. & Moncrieff, C. (1988). Body image distortion in anorexics as a non-sensory phenomenon: a signal detection approach. Journal of Clinical Psychology 44, 101–107.3.0.CO;2-U>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gardner, R. M., Martinez, R. & Espinoza, T. (1987 a). Psychophysical measurements of body image of self and others in obese subjects. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality 2, 205–217.Google Scholar
Gardner, R. M., Martinez, R. & Sandoval, Y. (1987 b). Obesity and body image: an evaluation of sensory and non-sensory components. Psychological Medicine 17, 927–932.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garner, D. M. & Garfinkel, P. E. (1981). Body image in anorexia nervosa: measurement, theory and clinical implications. International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine 11, 263–284.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garner, D. M., Garfinkel, P. E., Stancer, H. C. & Moldofsky, H. (1976). Body image disturbances in anorexia nervosa and obesity. Psychosomatic Medicine 38, 327–337.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garner, D. M., Garfinkel, P. E. & Moldofsky, H. (1978). Perceptual experiences in anorexia nervosa and obesity. Canadian Psychiatric Association Journal 23, 249–260.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jupp, J. J. & Collins, J. K. (1983). Instruments for the measurement of unconscious and conscious aspects of body image. Australian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis 11, 89–100.Google Scholar
Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. (1983). What new weight charts really mean. US News and World Report 94, 8.Google Scholar
Schontz, F. C. (1974). Body image and its disorders. International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine 5, 150–161.Google Scholar
Slade, P. D. & Russell, G. F. M. (1973). Awareness of body dimension in anorexia nervosa: cross-section and longitudinal studies. Psychological Medicine 3, 188–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swets, J. A. (1964). Signal Detection and Recognition by Human Observers. Wiley: New York.Google Scholar
Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgments under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science 185, 1124–1130.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed