Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T20:12:17.381Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The power and omnipotence of voices: subordination and entrapment by voices and significant others

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2000

M. BIRCHWOOD
Affiliation:
Early Intervention Service, Northern Birmingham Mental Health Trust and School of Psychology, University of Birmingham
A. MEADEN
Affiliation:
Early Intervention Service, Northern Birmingham Mental Health Trust and School of Psychology, University of Birmingham
P. TROWER
Affiliation:
Early Intervention Service, Northern Birmingham Mental Health Trust and School of Psychology, University of Birmingham
P. GILBERT
Affiliation:
Early Intervention Service, Northern Birmingham Mental Health Trust and School of Psychology, University of Birmingham
J. PLAISTOW
Affiliation:
Early Intervention Service, Northern Birmingham Mental Health Trust and School of Psychology, University of Birmingham

Abstract

Background. Cognitive therapy for psychotic symptoms often embraces self-evaluative beliefs (e.g. self-worth) but whether and how such beliefs are related to delusions remains uncertain. In previous research we demonstrated that distress arising from voices was linked to beliefs about voices and not voice content alone. In this study we examine whether the relationship with the voice is a paradigm of social relationships in general, using a new framework of social cognition, ‘ranking’ theory.

Method. In a sample of 59 voice hearers, measures of power and social rank difference between voice and voice hearer are taken in addition to parallel measures of power and rank in wider social relationships.

Results. As predicted, subordination to voices was closely linked to subordination and marginalization in other social relationships. This was not the result of a mood-linked appraisal. Distress arising from voices was linked not to voice characteristics but social and interpersonal cognition.

Conclusion. This study suggests that the power imbalance between the individual and his persecutor(s) may have origins in an appraisal by the individual of his social rank and sense of group identification and belonging. The results also raise the possibility that the appraisal of voice frequency and volume are the result of the appraisal of voices' rank and power. Theoretical and novel treatment implications are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2000 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)