Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T00:41:24.044Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Double-blind procedure: an assessment in a study of lithium prophylaxis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2009

F. Stallone ,
J. Mendlewicz  and
R. R. Fieve
F. Stallone*
Affiliation:
New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, U.S.A.
J. Mendlewicz
Affiliation:
New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, U.S.A.
R. R. Fieve
Affiliation:
New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, U.S.A.
*
1Address for correspondence: Dr. Frank Stallone, New York State Psychiatric Institute, 722 West 168th Street, New York, N.Y.10032, U.S.A.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Synopsis

Fifty-seven patients with primary affective disorder who were in a double-blind outpatient study to evaluate the prophylaxis of lithium were questioned as to whether they believed they were receiving lithium or placebo. Research nurses who were ‘blind’ to the patients' medication and a close relative living with each patient were also questioned. Nearly all patients (96%) said they believed they were receiving lithium, ascribing this belief in 63% of the cases to a perceived improvement in condition. In only 14% of the cases on lithium was the presence of side-effects implicated in the patients' beliefs. One of the three nurses had a correct guess rate in excess of chance expectancy. All nurses tended to be more accurate in their guesses in the cases of patients who had been in prophylactic trials of over 15 months' duration than for patients with briefer periods in the study. Patients' relatives were, as a group, extremely accurate, their correct guess rate exceeding chance expectancy at the 0·001 level.

Type
Research Article
Information
Psychological Medicine , Volume 5 , Issue 1 , February 1975 , pp. 78 - 82
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Baastrup, P. C., Paulsen, J. C., Schou, M., Thomsen, K., and Amdisen, A. (1970). Prophylactic lithium: double-blind discontinuation in manic-depressive and recurrent-depressive disorders. Lancet, 2, 326–330.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coppen, A., Noguera, R., Bailey, J., Burns, B. H., Swani, M. S., Hare, E. H., Gardner, R., and Maggs, R. (1971). Prophylactic lithium in affective disorders. Controlled trial. Lancet, 2, 275–279.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Melia, P. I. (1970). Prophylactic lithium: a double-blind trial in recurrent affective disorders. British Journal of Psychiatry, 116, 621–624.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stallone, F., Mendlewicz, J., and Fieve, R. R. (1974). How blind is the double-blind? An assessment in a lithium-prophylaxis study. Lancet, 1, 619–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stallone, F., Shelley, E., Mendlewicz, J., and Fieve, R. R. (1973). The use of lithium in affective disorders. 3: A double-blind study of prophylaxis in bipolar illness. American Journal of Psychiatry, 130, 1006–1010.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed