Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-rvbq7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T06:33:07.244Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

International reliability and communicability of a rating scale for depression1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2009

Marie Åsberg ,
Per Kragh-Sørensen ,
R. H. S. Mindham  and
J. Richard Tuck
Marie Åsberg*
Affiliation:
From the Department of Psychiatry, Karolinska Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
Per Kragh-Sørensen
Affiliation:
From the Department of Psychiatry, Karolinska Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
R. H. S. Mindham
Affiliation:
Department O, State Mental Hospital of Glostrup, Denmark
J. Richard Tuck
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychiatry, de Crespigny Park, London
*
2 Address for correspondence: Dr. Marie Åsberg, Department of Psychiatry, Karolinska Hospital, S–104 01 Stockholm 60, Sweden.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Synopsis

A rating scale for depression, intended for international studies of drug treatment, is presented. The reliability between raters differing in training and language was 0·86 (Swedish and English raters) and 0·92 (Swedish and Danish raters); the reliability between two Swedish raters was 0·97. There was a strong correlation between severity of depression as measured on this scale and on a nurses' rating scale (0·87). The correlation with patients' self-ratings of depression was weaker (0·63) but still significant.

Type
Research Article
Information
Psychological Medicine , Volume 3 , Issue 4 , November 1973 , pp. 458 - 465
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

This study was supported by the Swedish Medical Research Council, B73–14P–3647–02, the Bank of Sweden Tercentenary Fund, the Danish Medical Research Council, 512–1646, and by funds from the Karolinska Institute.

References

REFERENCES

Åsberg, M., Cronholm, B., Sjöqvist, F., and Tuck, D. (1971). Relationship between plasma level and therapeutic effect of nortriptyline. British Medical Journal, 3, 331–334.Google Scholar
Beck, A. T., Ward, C. H., Mendelson, M., Mock, J., and Erbaugh, J. (1961). An inventory for measuring depression. Archives of General Psychiatry, 4, 561–571.Google Scholar
Burrows, G. D., Davies, B., and Scoggins, B. A. (1972). Plasma concentration of nortriptyline and clinical response in depressive illness. Lancet, 2, 619–623.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buss, A. H. (1962). Two anxiety factors in psychiatric patients. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 65, 426–427.Google Scholar
Cooper, J. E., Kendell, R. E., Gurland, B. J., Sartorius, N., and Farkas, T. (1969). Cross-national study of diagnosis of the mental disorders: some results from the first comparative investigation. American Journal of Psychiatry, 125, No. 10, Suppl., 21–29.Google Scholar
Cronholm, B., and Ottosson, J.-O. (1960). Experimental studies of the therapeutic action of electroconvulsive therapy in endogenous depression. Acta Psychiatrica et Neurologica Scandinavica, 35, Suppl. 145, 69–101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cronholm, B., and Ottosson, J.-O. (1961). Memory functions in endogenous depression before and after electroconvulsive therapy. Archives of General Psychiatry, 5, 193–199.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
d'Elia, G., Isaksson, A., Larkander, O., Morsing, C., Ottosson, J.-O., Perris, C., and Rapp, W. (1969). Reliabilitet vid skattning av depressionssymtom och läkemedelsbiverkningar. In Symposium om depressionsbehandling, p. 131. Edited by Cronholm, B. and Sjöqvist, F.. Appelbergs: Uppsala.Google Scholar
Grinker, R. R. and Nunnally, J. C. (1970). The phenomena of depressions. In Psychopathology Today: Experimentation, Theory and Research, pp. 392–400. Edited by Sahakian, W. S.. Peacock: Itasca, III.Google Scholar
Kragh-Sørensen, P., Åsberg, M., and Eggert-Hansen, C. (1973). Plasma-nortriptyline levels in endogenous depression. Lancet, 1, 113–115.Google Scholar
Lewis, A. (1967). Problems presented by the ambiguous word ‘anxiety’ as used in psychopathology. Israel Annals of Psychiatry and Related Disciplines, 5, 105–121.Google ScholarPubMed
Perris, C. (ed.). (1966). A study of bipolar (manic-depressive) and unipolar recurrent depressive psychoses. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavia, 42, Suppl. 194.Google Scholar
Pichot, P., Bailly, R., and Overall, J. E. (1967). Les stéréotypes diagnostiques des psychoses chez les psychiatres français. Comparaison avec les stéréotypes américains. In NeuroPsycho-Pharmacology, pp. 16–26. Proceedings of the Fifth International Congress of the Collegium Internationale Neuropsychopharmacologicum, Washington, 1966. International Congress Series No. 129. Excerpta Medica: Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Schalling, D., Cronholm, B., Åsberg, M., and Espmark, S. (1973). Ratings of psychic and somatic anxiety indicants—inter-rater reliability and relations to personality variables. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 49, 353–368.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Siegel, S. (1956). Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. McGraw-Hill: New York.Google Scholar