Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T08:31:13.282Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Thought disorder in schizophrenia is associated with both executive dysfunction and circumscribed impairments in semantic function

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2006

JOHN STIRLING
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology and Speech Pathology, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK
JONATHAN HELLEWELL
Affiliation:
Moorside Unit, Department of Psychiatry, Trafford General Hospital, Manchester, UK
ANDREW BLAKEY
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Macclesfield General Hospital, Macclesfield, Cheshire, UK
WILLIAM DEAKIN
Affiliation:
Neuroscience and Psychiatry Unit, Stopford Building, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK

Abstract

Background. Formal thought disorder (FTD) has long been regarded as a key sign of schizophrenia but little is known about its origins or aetiology. One suggestion is that it is directly related to disordered language functioning; a second is that it is a reflection of poor neurocognitive functioning. A current model posits that it is related to a combination of executive dysfunction and impaired semantic processing.

Method. To examine these alternative ideas, a heterogeneous group of 30 patients, all carrying a diagnosis of schizophrenia, and 18 non-patient controls completed a series of neurocognitive and psycholinguistic tests, and a clinical review that, inter alia, permitted assessment of thought disorder (TD) using the Thought, Language and Communication Scale (TLC).

Results. Patients generally performed at a lower level on most components of the test battery, but there was little evidence of a relationship between TD and syntactic psycholinguistic function. However, schizophrenic patients manifesting higher levels of TD performed at a lower level on tests sensitive to executive dysfunction and semantic impairments.

Conclusions. The origins of TD seem more closely linked to deficits in executive functioning and semantic processing than to impairments in other language functions or general cognition.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© 2006 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)