Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message

Login Alert

Cancel
Log in
×
×
Register
Log In
(0) Cart
Logo for Cambridge Core from Cambridge University Press. Click to return to homepage.
Logo for Cambridge Core from Cambridge University Press. Click to return to homepage.
Cited by
  • Crossref logo 18
  • Google Scholar logo
Crossref Citations
Crossref logo
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.
von Davier, Matthias 2003. COMPARING CONDITIONAL AND MARGINAL DIRECT ESTIMATION OF SUBGROUP DISTRIBUTIONS. ETS Research Report Series, Vol. 2003, Issue. 1,
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
von Davier, Matthias Sinharay, Sandip Oranje, Andreas and Beaton, Albert 2006. Psychometrics. Vol. 26, Issue. , p. 1039.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
von Davier, Matthias and Sinharay, Sandip 2009. STOCHASTIC APPROXIMATION METHODS FOR LATENT REGRESSION ITEM RESPONSE MODELS. ETS Research Report Series, Vol. 2009, Issue. 1,
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
von Davier, Matthias and Sinharay, Sandip 2010. Stochastic Approximation Methods for Latent Regression Item Response Models. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, Vol. 35, Issue. 2, p. 174.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Si, Yajuan and Reiter, Jerome P. 2013. Nonparametric Bayesian Multiple Imputation for Incomplete Categorical Variables in Large-Scale Assessment Surveys. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, Vol. 38, Issue. 5, p. 499.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Anderson, Carolyn J. 2013. Multidimensional Item Response Theory Models with Collateral Information as Poisson Regression Models. Journal of Classification, Vol. 30, Issue. 2, p. 276.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Huo, Yan de la Torre, Jimmy Mun, Eun-Young Kim, Su-Young Ray, Anne E. Jiao, Yang and White, Helene R. 2015. A Hierarchical Multi-Unidimensional IRT Approach for Analyzing Sparse, Multi-Group Data for Integrative Data Analysis. Psychometrika, Vol. 80, Issue. 3, p. 834.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Wetzel, Eunike Xu, Xueli and von Davier, Matthias 2015. An Alternative Way to Model Population Ability Distributions in Large-Scale Educational Surveys. Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 75, Issue. 5, p. 739.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Rutkowski, Leslie and Zhou, Yan 2015. Correcting Measurement Error in Latent Regression Covariates via the MC‐SIMEX Method. Journal of Educational Measurement, Vol. 52, Issue. 4, p. 359.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Beaton, Albert E. and Barone, John L. 2017. Advancing Human Assessment. p. 233.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
von Davier, Matthias Khorramdel, Lale He, Qiwei Shin, Hyo Jeong and Chen, Haiwen 2019. Developments in Psychometric Population Models for Technology-Based Large-Scale Assessments: An Overview of Challenges and Opportunities. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, Vol. 44, Issue. 6, p. 671.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Xu, Xueli and von Davier, Matthias 2019. Handbook of Diagnostic Classification Models. p. 489.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Oranje, Andreas and Kolstad, Andrew 2019. Research on Psychometric Modeling, Analysis, and Reporting of the National Assessment of Educational Progress. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, Vol. 44, Issue. 6, p. 648.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Klotzke, Konrad and Fox, Jean-Paul 2019. Bayesian Covariance Structure Modeling of Responses and Process Data. Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 10, Issue. ,
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Khorramdel, Lale von Davier, Matthias Gonzalez, Eugenio and Yamamoto, Kentaro 2020. Large-Scale Cognitive Assessment. p. 27.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Tu, Naidan Zhang, Bo Angrave, Lawrence Sun, Tianjun and Neuman, Mathew 2023. Estimating the Multidimensional Generalized Graded Unfolding Model with Covariates Using a Bayesian Approach. Journal of Intelligence, Vol. 11, Issue. 8, p. 163.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Edwards, Kelly D. and Soland, James 2024. How Scoring Approaches Impact Estimates of Growth in the Presence of Survey Item Ceiling Effects. Applied Psychological Measurement, Vol. 48, Issue. 3, p. 147.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Soland, James Edwards, Kelly and Talbert, Eli 2024. When Should Evaluators Lose Sleep Over Measurement? Toward Establishing Best Practices. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, p. 1.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Google Scholar Citations

View all Google Scholar citations for this article.

×
Cambridge University Press

Our Site

  • Accessibility
  • Contact & Help
  • Legal Notices

Our Platforms

  • Cambridge Core
  • Cambridge Open Engage
  • Cambridge Higher Education

Our Products

  • Journals
  • Books
  • Elements
  • Textbooks
  • Courseware

Join us online

Please choose a valid location.

  • Rights & Permissions
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Notice
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies Policy
Cambridge University Press 2025

Cancel
Confirm
×

Save article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

The Role of Secondary Covariates when Estimating latent Trait Population Distributions
  • Volume 67, Issue 1
  • Neal Thomas (a1)
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294708
Please provide your Kindle email.
Available formats Please select a format to save.
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

The Role of Secondary Covariates when Estimating latent Trait Population Distributions
  • Volume 67, Issue 1
  • Neal Thomas (a1)
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294708
Available formats Please select a format to save.
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

The Role of Secondary Covariates when Estimating latent Trait Population Distributions
  • Volume 67, Issue 1
  • Neal Thomas (a1)
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294708
Available formats Please select a format to save.
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Contents help
Close Contents help

- No HTML tags allowed
- Web page URLs will display as text only
- Lines and paragraphs break automatically
- Attachments, images or tables are not permitted

Please enter your response.

Your details

Email help
Close Email help

Your email address will be used in order to notify you when your comment has been reviewed by the moderator and in case the author(s) of the article or the moderator need to contact you directly.

Please enter a valid email address.
You have entered the maximum number of contributors

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? * Conflicting interests help

Close Conflicting interests help

Please list any fees and grants from, employment by, consultancy for, shared ownership in or any close relationship with, at any time over the preceding 36 months, any organisation whose interests may be affected by the publication of the response. Please also list any non-financial associations or interests (personal, professional, political, institutional, religious or other) that a reasonable reader would want to know about in relation to the submitted work. This pertains to all the authors of the piece, their spouses or partners.