Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-767nl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-15T02:27:20.294Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

National Diet and Nutrition Surveys: the British experience

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2007

Margaret Ashwell ,
Susan Barlow ,
Sigrid Gibson  and
Caroline Harris
Margaret Ashwell*
Affiliation:
Ashwell Associates (Europe) Ltd, Ashwell Street, Ashwell, Hertfordshire, SG7 5PZ and Oxford Brookes University, Headington Campus, Gipsy Lane, Oxford, OX3 0BP, UK
Susan Barlow
Affiliation:
Consultant in Toxicology, 8 Harrington Road, Brighton, East Sussex, BN1 6RE, UK
Sigrid Gibson
Affiliation:
SiG-Nurture Ltd, 11 Woodway, Guildford, Surrey, GU1 2TF, UK
Caroline Harris
Affiliation:
Exponent International Ltd, 2D Hornbeam Park Oval, Harrogate, HG2 8RB, UK
*
*Corresponding author: Email margaret@ashwell.uk.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Objective

The National Diet and Nutrition Surveys (NDNS) are a series of government-funded surveys of food intake, nutrient intake and nutritional status of individuals, undertaken to support nutritional policy and risk assessment. This paper summarises a review that considered the extent to which NDNS met the needs of users and suggested options for the future. The Food Standards Agency has since progressed favoured options. This paper aims to help others wishing to obtain this type of information within their own populations.

Design

A detailed questionnaire was used to probe use of data and gather opinions from users, producers and managers of the NDNS. It asked about general information needs from NDNS and changes that might be made. This was followed by a two-day workshop which included discussion of the main issues and the generation of 19 possible future options for consideration by the Agency.

Results

Options to improve effectiveness included methods to prioritise breadth and depth of coverage and possible ways of improving response and compliance. Strategies to make surveys more efficient and timely, such as adopting a rolling programme, disaggregating survey components, integrating with other studies and improving data access, were also suggested. A rolling programme, in which data are collected continuously, was the favoured option to address some of the concerns and a strategy is now in place to achieve this.

Conclusions

There is widespread support for the NDNS from its users. There is no alternative source for such high-quality data on food and nutrient consumption and nutritional status and physical measurements in the same individuals. Useful information, such as the potential value of using a rolling programme from the outset, can be gained from this British experience by others wishing to measure food and nutrient intakes and status in their own populations.

Keywords

DietSurveysBritainStatusNDNSFood Standards AgencyNutritionFood chemical exposureRolling programmeLessons
Type
Research Article
Information
Public Health Nutrition , Volume 9 , Issue 4 , June 2006 , pp. 523 - 530
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2006

References

1Gregory, J, Foster, K, Tyler, H, Wiseman, M. The Dietary and Nutritional Survey of British Adults. London: HMSO, 1990.Google Scholar
2Gregory, J, Collins, D, Davies, P, Hughes, J, Clarke, P. National Diet and Nutrition Survey: Children aged 1.5 to 4.5 years. Vol. 1. Report of the Diet and Nutrition Survey. London: HMSO, 1995.Google Scholar
3Hinds, K, Gregory, J. National Diet and Nutrition Survey: Children aged 1.5 to 4.5 years. Vol. 2. Report of the Dental Survey. London: HMSO, 1995.Google Scholar
4Finch, S, Doyle, W, Lowe, C, Bates, C, Prentice, A, Smithers, G, et al. National Diet and Nutrition Survey: People aged 65 years and over. Vol. 1. Report of the Diet and Nutrition Survey. London: The Stationery Office, 1998.Google Scholar
5Steele, J, Sheiham, A, Marcenes, W, Walls, AWG. National Diet and Nutrition Survey: People aged 65 years and over. Vol. 2. Report of the Oral Health Survey. London: The Stationery Office, 1998.Google Scholar
6Gregory, J, Lowe, S. National Diet and Nutrition Survey (NDNS): Young people aged 4–18 years. London: The Stationery Office, 2000.Google Scholar
7Walker, A, Bradnock, GJ, Nunn, J, White, D. National Diet and Nutrition Survey: Young people aged 4 to 18 years. Vol. 2. Report of the Oral Health Survey. London: The Stationery Office, 2000.Google Scholar
8Henderson, L, Gregory, J, Swan, G. National Diet and Nutrition Survey (NDNS): Adults aged 19–64 years. Vol. 1. Types and Quantities of Foods Consumed. London: The Stationery Office, 2002.Google Scholar
9Henderson, L, Gregory, J, Irving, K, Swan, G. The National Diet and Nutrition Survey: Adults aged 19 to 64 years. Vol. 2. Energy, Protein, Carbohydrate, Fat and Alcohol Intake. London: The Stationery Office, 2003.Google Scholar
10Henderson, L, Irving, K, Gregory, J, Bates, CJ, Prentice, A, Perks, J, et al. The National Diet and Nutrition Survey: Adults aged 19 to 64 years. Vol. 3. Vitamin and Mineral Intake and Urinary Analytes. London: The Stationery Office, 2003.Google Scholar
11Ruston, D, Hoare, J, Henderson, L, Gregory, J, Bates, CJ, Prentice, A, et al. The National Diet and Nutrition Survey: Adults aged 19 to 64 years. Vol. 4. Nutritional Status (Anthropometry and Blood Analytes), Blood Pressure and Physical Activity. London: The Stationery Office, 2004.Google Scholar
12Hoare, J, Henderson, L, Bates, CJ, Prentice, A, Birch, M, Swan, G, et al. The National Diet and Nutrition Survey: Adults aged 19 to 64 years. Vol. 5. Summary Report. London: The Stationery Office, 2004.Google Scholar